Blog

  • California Physical Therapist License Defense Attorney

    Physical Therapy Board of California License Defense Lawyer

    The Physical Therapy Board of California, known as the PTB, licenses approximately 25,000 Physical Therapists in the State of California. Most California Physical Therapists have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the Physical Therapy Board of California. For Physical Therapists who become part of the Physical Therapy Board of California’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Physical Therapist License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Physical Therapists facing the Physical Therapy Board of California disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Physical Therapist License Defense Attorney.

    Physical Therapy Board of California Investigation Defense Lawyer

    The majority of Physical Therapy Board of California investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Physical Therapy Board of California Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Physical Therapy Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Physical Therapists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

    It is important to have an attorney that understands the Physical Therapy Board of California disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a Physical Therapy Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

    If you are a Physical Therapist facing a Physical Therapy Board of California investigation, contact a California Physical Therapist License Defense Attorney for representation.

    California Physical Therapist License Accusation Defense Attorney

    A formal Accusation served on a California Physical Therapist serves as notice to a Physical Therapist that the Board intends to revoke the Physical Therapist License. The Physical Therapist, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Physical Therapist. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Physical Therapist License.

    An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Physical Therapist License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Physical Therapists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Physical Therapy Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

    Physical Therapists facing a Physical Therapy Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Physical Therapist License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Physical Therapists include:

    • Accepting or Paying Referral Fees
    • Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Practice of Physical Therapy
    • Altering Medical Records
    • Exceeding Scope of Practice
    • Excessive Prescribing or Treatment
    • Failure to Maintain Adequate Records
    • Failure to Notify Board of Address Change
    • False or Misleading Advertising
    • Providing Nutritional Advice
    • Gross Negligence
    • Improper Ratio of Physical Therapists to Physical Therapy Aides or Physical Therapy Assistants
    • Improper Use of Topical Medications
    • Incompetence
    • Making False Documents
    • Repeated Negligent Acts
    • Self Abuse of Drugs or Alcohol
    • Sexual Misconduct With a Patient
    • Subverting a Licensing Exam
    • Unauthorized Use of Medical Designation
    • Unprofessional Conduct
    • Use of Runners or Cappers
    • Violation of Professional Confidence

    California Physical Therapist License Hearing Attorney

    The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

    The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Physical Therapy Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Physical Therapy Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Physical Therapist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physical Therapist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

    California Physical Therapists facing a Physical Therapy Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Physical Therapist License Defense Lawyer.

    California Physical Therapist License and Criminal Convictions

    The Physical Therapy Board of California can discipline Physical Therapists for criminal convictions. Physical Therapy Board of California discipline occurs for convictions for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Physical Therapist. Common criminal offenses that can cause Physical Therapist License discipline are:

    • Altering or Forging a Prescription
    • Assault With a Deadly Weapon
    • Battery
    • Brandishing a Firearm
    • Burglary
    • Carrying a Concealed Weapon
    • Child Abuse
    • Child Endangerment
    • Diverting a Controlled Substance
    • Domestic Violence
    • DUI
    • Elder Abuse
    • False Imprisonment
    • Forgery
    • Fraud
    • Hit & Run
    • Identity Theft
    • Insurance Fraud
    • Medicare Fraud
    • Mortgage Fraud
    • Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance
    • Possession of a Controlled Substance
    • Public Intoxication
    • Real Estate Fraud
    • Robbery
    • Sex Offenses
    • Theft
    • Trespass
    • Vandalism
    • Vehicular Manslaughter

    The Physical Therapy Board of California and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Physical Therapists in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Physical Therapists engaged in Insurance Fraud, Unlawful Practice of Medicine and Unlawful Representation as a Physician. In serious criminal cases against Physical Therapists pending in Criminal Court, the Physical Therapy Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Physical Therapist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Physical Therapist License in Criminal Court.

    Physical Therapists facing criminal charges and Physical Therapists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Physical Therapist License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Physical Therapy Board of California.

    California Physical Therapist License Statement of Issues Attorney

    The Physical Therapy Board of California thoroughly investigates all applicants for Physical Therapist Licenses. The Physical Therapy Board of California may deny a California Physical Therapist License to Physical Therapist students and Physical Therapists from other states and countries. Most California Physical Therapist License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Physical Therapist License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Physical Therapist License should contact a California Physical Therapist License Denial Lawyer for representation in a Physical Therapy Board of California Statement of Issues Hearing.

    California Physical Therapist Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

    A Petition for Reinstatement allows Physical Therapists who have received a Physical Therapist License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Physical Therapist License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the Physical Therapy Board of California. A successful Physical Therapist License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Physical Therapist License Defense Attorney.

  • California Pharmacy Technician License Defense Attorney

    California Board of Pharmacy License Defense Lawyer

    The California Board of Pharmacy, known as the BOP, licenses approximately 73,000 Pharmacy Technicians in the State of California. Most California Pharmacy Technicians have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Board of Pharmacy. For Pharmacy Technicians who become part of the California Board of Pharmacy’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Pharmacy Technician License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Pharmacy Technicians facing the California Board of Pharmacy disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Pharmacy Technician License Defense Attorney.

    California Board of Pharmacy Investigation Defense Lawyer

    The majority of California Board of Pharmacy investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Board of Pharmacy Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Board of Pharmacy utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Pharmacy Technicians. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

    It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Board of Pharmacy disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Board of Pharmacy investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

    If you are a Pharmacy Technician facing a California Board of Pharmacy investigation, contact a California Pharmacy Technician License Defense Attorney for representation.

    California Pharmacy Technician License Accusation Defense Attorney

    A formal Accusation served on a California Pharmacy Technician serves as notice to a Pharmacy Technician that the Board intends to revoke the Pharmacy Technician License. The Pharmacy Technician, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Pharmacy Technician. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Pharmacy Technician License.

    An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Pharmacy Technician License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Pharmacy Technicians to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Board of Pharmacy. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

    Pharmacy Technicians facing a California Board of Pharmacy Accusation should contact an experienced California Pharmacy Technician License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Pharmacy Technicians include:

    • Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Pharmacist Activity
    • Altering Prescriptions
    • Compounding Unapproved Drugs
    • Dishonesty or Fraud
    • Diverting Medication
    • Evading Reporting Requirements
    • Failure to File DEA Forms
    • Failure to File Prescriptions
    • Failure to Maintain Adequate Patient Records
    • False of Misleading Advertising
    • Forging Prescriptions
    • Furnishing Dangerous Drugs Without a Prescription
    • Furnishing a Controlled Substance Without a Prescription
    • Illicit Activities
    • Failure to Maintain Inventory
    • Failure to Provide a Patient Consultation
    • Failure to Supervise Pharmacy Operations
    • Failure to Supervise Pharmacy Technicians
    • Incompetence
    • Negligence
    • Practice Outside the Scope of Pharmacy
    • Providing Chemical for Illicit Manufacturing
    • Unauthorized Disclosure of Prescriptions
    • Unlawful Commissions, Gratuities and Rebates
    • Unlawful Disposal of Waste Material
    • Unlawful Importation of Controlled Substances
    • Unlawful Sale of Controlled Substances
    • Unlawful Transportation of Controlled Substances
    • Unprofessional Conduct
    • Variation From Prescriptions

    California Pharmacy Technician License Hearing Attorney

    The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

    The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Board of Pharmacy can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Board of Pharmacy’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Pharmacy Technician to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Pharmacy Technician can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

    California Pharmacy Technicians facing a California Board of Pharmacy Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Pharmacy Technician License Defense Lawyer.

    California Pharmacy Technician License and Criminal Convictions

    The California Board of Pharmacy can discipline Pharmacy Technicians for criminal convictions. California Board of Pharmacy discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Pharmacy Technician. Common criminal offenses that can cause Pharmacy Technician License discipline are:

    • Altering or Forging a Prescription
    • Assault With a Deadly Weapon
    • Battery
    • Brandishing a Firearm
    • Burglary
    • Carrying a Concealed Weapon
    • Child Abuse
    • Child Endangerment
    • Diverting a Controlled Substance
    • Domestic Violence
    • DUI
    • Elder Abuse
    • False Imprisonment
    • Forgery
    • Fraud
    • Hit & Run
    • Identity Theft
    • Insurance Fraud
    • Medicare Fraud
    • Mortgage Fraud
    • Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance
    • Possession of a Controlled Substance
    • Public Intoxication
    • Real Estate Fraud
    • Robbery
    • Sex Offenses
    • Theft
    • Trespass
    • Vandalism
    • Vehicular Manslaughter

    The California Board of Pharmacy and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Pharmacy Technicians in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Pharmacy Technicians engaged in Diverting Narcotics, Practicing Pharmacy Without a License, Prescription Pill Fraud, Prescription Narcotics Sales and Theft. In serious criminal cases against Pharmacy Technicians pending in Criminal Court, the California Board of Pharmacy and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Pharmacy Technician. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Pharmacy Technician License in Criminal Court.

    Pharmacy Technicians facing criminal charges and Pharmacy Technicians who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Pharmacy Technician License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Board of Pharmacy.

    California Pharmacy Technician License Statement of Issues Attorney

    The California Board of Pharmacy thoroughly investigates all applicants for Pharmacy Technician Licenses. The California Board of Pharmacy may deny a California Pharmacy Technician License to Pharmacy Technician students and Pharmacy Technicians from other states and countries. Most California Pharmacy Technician License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Pharmacy Technician License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Pharmacy Technician License should contact a California Pharmacy Technician License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Board of Pharmacy Statement of Issues Hearing.

    California Pharmacy Technician Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

    A Petition for Reinstatement allows Pharmacy Technicians who have received a Pharmacy Technician License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Pharmacy Technician License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Board of Pharmacy. A successful Pharmacy Technician License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Pharmacy Technician License Defense Attorney.

  • California Pharmacist License Defense Attorney

    California Board of Pharmacy License Defense Lawyer

    The California Board of Pharmacy, known as the BOP, licenses approximately 42,000 Pharmacists in the State of California. Most California Pharmacists have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Board of Pharmacy. For Pharmacists who become part of the California Board of Pharmacy’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Pharmacist License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Pharmacists facing the California Board of Pharmacy disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Pharmacist License Defense Attorney.

    California Board of Pharmacy Investigation Defense Lawyer

    The majority of California Board of Pharmacy investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Board of Pharmacy Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Board of Pharmacy utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Pharmacists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

    It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Board of Pharmacy disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Board of Pharmacy investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

    If you are a Pharmacist facing a California Board of Pharmacy investigation, contact a California Pharmacist License Defense Attorney for representation.

    California Pharmacist License Accusation Defense Attorney

    A formal Accusation served on a California Pharmacist serves as notice to a Pharmacist that the Board intends to revoke the Pharmacist License. The Pharmacist, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Pharmacist. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Pharmacist License.

    An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Pharmacist License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Pharmacists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Board of Pharmacy. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

    Pharmacists facing a California Board of Pharmacy Accusation should contact an experienced California Pharmacist License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Pharmacists include:

    • Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Pharmacist Activity
    • Altering Prescriptions
    • Compounding Unapproved Drugs
    • Dishonesty or Fraud
    • Diverting Medication
    • Evading Reporting Requirements
    • Failure to File DEA Forms
    • Failure to File Prescriptions
    • Failure to Maintain Adequate Patient Records
    • False of Misleading Advertising
    • Forging Prescriptions
    • Furnishing Dangerous Drugs Without a Prescription
    • Furnishing a Controlled Substance Without a Prescription
    • Illicit Activities
    • Failure to Maintain Inventory
    • Failure to Provide a Patient Consultation
    • Failure to Supervise Pharmacy Operations
    • Failure to Supervise Pharmacy Technicians
    • Incompetence
    • Negligence
    • Practice Outside the Scope of Pharmacy
    • Providing Chemical for Illicit Manufacturing
    • Unauthorized Disclosure of Prescriptions
    • Unlawful Commissions, Gratuities and Rebates
    • Unlawful Disposal of Waste Material
    • Unlawful Importation of Controlled Substances
    • Unlawful Sale of Controlled Substances
    • Unlawful Transportation of Controlled Substances
    • Unprofessional Conduct
    • Variation From Prescriptions

    California Pharmacist License Hearing Attorney

    The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

    The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Board of Pharmacy can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Board of Pharmacy’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Pharmacist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Pharmacist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

    California Pharmacists facing a California Board of Pharmacy Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Pharmacist License Defense Lawyer.

    California Pharmacist License and Criminal Convictions

    The California Board of Pharmacy can discipline Pharmacists for criminal convictions. California Board of Pharmacy discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Pharmacist. Common criminal offenses that can cause Pharmacist License discipline are:

    • Altering or Forging a Prescription
    • Assault With a Deadly Weapon
    • Battery
    • Brandishing a Firearm
    • Burglary
    • Carrying a Concealed Weapon
    • Child Abuse
    • Child Endangerment
    • Diverting a Controlled Substance
    • Domestic Violence
    • DUI
    • Elder Abuse
    • False Imprisonment
    • Forgery
    • Fraud
    • Hit & Run
    • Identity Theft
    • Insurance Fraud
    • Medicare Fraud
    • Mortgage Fraud
    • Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance
    • Possession of a Controlled Substance
    • Public Intoxication
    • Real Estate Fraud
    • Robbery
    • Sex Offenses
    • Theft
    • Trespass
    • Vandalism
    • Vehicular Manslaughter

    The California Board of Pharmacy and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Pharmacists in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Pharmacists engaged in Prescription Pill Fraud, Prescription Narcotics Sales and Theft. In serious criminal cases against Pharmacists pending in Criminal Court, the California Board of Pharmacy and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Pharmacist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Pharmacist License in Criminal Court.

    Pharmacists facing criminal charges and Pharmacists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Pharmacist License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Board of Pharmacy.

    California Pharmacist License Statement of Issues Attorney

    The California Board of Pharmacy thoroughly investigates all applicants for Pharmacist Licenses. The California Board of Pharmacy may deny a California Pharmacist License to Pharmacist students and Pharmacists from other states and countries. Most California Pharmacist License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Pharmacist License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Pharmacist License should contact a California Pharmacist License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Board of Pharmacy Statement of Issues Hearing.

    California Pharmacist Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

    A Petition for Reinstatement allows Pharmacists who have received a Pharmacist License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Pharmacist License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Board of Pharmacy. A successful Pharmacist License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Pharmacist License Defense Attorney.

  • California Payday Lender License Defense Attorney

    California Department of Payday Lender License Defense Lawyer

    The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, known as DFPI, licenses several hundred thousand Payday Lenders in the State of California. Most California Payday Lenders have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. For Payday Lenders who become part of the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Payday Lender License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Payday Lenders facing the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Payday Lender License Defense Attorney.

    California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Investigation Defense Lawyer

    The majority of California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation employs non sworn Enforcement Representatives to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Payday Lenders. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

    It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation investigation, the Department has several options. The Department can choose to close the Complaint. The Department can choose to issue a Citation. The Department can also choose to refer the matter to the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Legal Division. The Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Legal Division will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Department may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

    If you are a Payday Lender Licensee facing a California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation investigation, contact a California Department of Payday Lender License Defense Attorney for representation.

    California Payday Lender License Accusation Defense Attorney

    A formal Accusation served on a California Payday Lender Licensee serves as notice to a Payday Lender that the Department intends to revoke the Payday Lenders’ License. The Payday Lender, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Payday Lender. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Payday Lenders’ License.

    An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Payday Lender License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Payday Lenders to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

    Payday Lenders facing a California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Accusation should contact an experienced California Payday Lender License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Payday Lenders include:

    • Accepting or Paying Referral Fees
    • Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Payday Lender Activity
    • Charing Illegal Fees and Penalties
    • Charging Illegal Interest
    • Dishonest, Corrupt or Fraudulent Act
    • Extortion
    • Gross Negligence
    • Failure to Maintain Adequate Records
    • Failure to Pay Civil Penalty
    • Failure to Pay Court Sanctions
    • Improper Advertising
    • Making an Unlawful New Loan to Pay Off an Existing Loan
    • Making Excessive Loans to Customers
    • Threatening Criminal Action for Nonpayment of Loans
    • Unprofessional Conduct
    • Usury
    • Willful Violation of Duty

    California Payday Lender License Hearing Attorney

    The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

    The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Payday Lender to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Payday Lender can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

    California Payday Lenders facing a California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Payday Lender License Defense Lawyer.

    California Payday Lender License and Criminal Convictions

    The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation can discipline Payday Lenders for criminal convictions. California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Payday Lender. Common criminal offenses that can cause Payday Lender License discipline are:

    • Altering or Forging a Prescription
    • Assault With a Deadly Weapon
    • Battery
    • Brandishing a Firearm
    • Burglary
    • Carrying a Concealed Weapon
    • Child Abuse
    • Child Endangerment
    • Diverting a Controlled Substance
    • Domestic Violence
    • DUI
    • Elder Abuse
    • False Imprisonment
    • Forgery
    • Fraud
    • Hit & Run
    • Identity Theft
    • Insurance Fraud
    • Medicare Fraud
    • Mortgage Fraud
    • Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance
    • Possession of a Controlled Substance
    • Public Intoxication
    • Real Estate Fraud
    • Robbery
    • Sex Offenses
    • Theft
    • Trespass
    • Vandalism
    • Vehicular Manslaughter

    The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Payday Lenders in the course and scope of their trade. Criminal investigations often involve Payday Lenders engaged in Elder Financial Abuse, Extortion, Fraud and Theft. In serious criminal cases against Payday Lenders pending in Criminal Court, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation and the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Legal Division may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Payday Lender. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Payday Lender License in Criminal Court.

    Payday Lenders facing criminal charges and Payday Lenders who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Payday Lender License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation.

    California Payday Lender License Statement of Issues Attorney

    The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation thoroughly investigates all applicants for Payday Lender Licenses. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation may deny a California Payday Lender License for a variety of reasons. Most California Payday Lender License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Payday Lender License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Payday Lender License should contact a California Payday Lender License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Statement of Issues Hearing.

    California Payday Lender License Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

    A Petition for Reinstatement allows Payday Lenders who have received a Payday Lender License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Payday Lender License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. A successful Payday Lender License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Payday Lender License Defense Attorney.

  • California Optometrist License Defense Attorney

    California Board of Optometry License Defense Lawyer

    The California Board of Optometry, known as the BOO, licenses approximately 10,000 Optometrists in the State of California. Most California Optometrists have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Board of Optometry. For Optometrists who become part of the California Board of Optometry’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Optometrist License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Optometrists facing the California Board of Optometry disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Optometrist License Defense Attorney.

    California Board of Optometry Investigation Defense Lawyer

    The majority of California Board of Optometry investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Board of Optometry Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Board of Optometry utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Optometrists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

    It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Board of Optometry disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Board of Optometry investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

    If you are an Optometrist facing a California Board of Optometry investigation, contact a California Optometrist License Defense Attorney for representation.

    California Optometrist License Accusation Defense Attorney

    A formal Accusation served on a California Optometrist serves as notice to an Optometrist that the Board intends to revoke the Optometrist License. The Optometrist, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Optometrist. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Optometrist License.

    An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of an Optometrist License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Optometrists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Board of Optometry. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

    Optometrists facing a California Board of Optometry Accusation should contact an experienced California Optometrist License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Optometrists include:

    • Accepting or Paying Referral Fees
    • Acting Outside Scope of Licensure
    • Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Optometrist Activity
    • Altering Medical Records
    • Dangerous Use of Alcohol or Drugs
    • Deceptive Advertising
    • Employing Cappers or Steerers
    • Employing Unlicensed Person
    • Excessive Prescribing
    • Excessive Treatment
    • Failure to Follow Infection Control Guidelines
    • Failure to Maintain Adequate Records
    • Failure to Refer Patient
    • False Representations of Fact
    • Fraud, Misrepresentation or Dishonesty
    • Furnishing a Controlled Substance Without a Prescription
    • Gross Negligence
    • Incompetence
    • Mental or Physical Incapacity
    • Misconduct
    • Prescribing Drugs Without Good Faith Examination
    • Prohibited Arrangements by Optometrists
    • Repeated Negligent Acts
    • Sexual Misconduct
    • Unlawful Location for Practice
    • Unlawful Referrals
    • Unlawful Solicitation
    • Unprofessional Conduct
    • Violation of Health & Safety Standards
    • Violation of Prescription Standards
    • Violation of Quality Standards for Prescription Ophthalmic Devices
    • Violations Regarding Topical Pharmaceutical Agents

    California Optometrist License Hearing Attorney

    The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

    The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Board of Optometry can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Board of Optometry’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows an Optometrist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Optometrist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

    California Optometrists facing a California Board of Optometry Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Optometrist License Defense Lawyer.

    California Optometrist License and Criminal Convictions

    The California Board of Optometry can discipline Optometrists for criminal convictions. California Board of Optometry discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of an Optometrist. Common criminal offenses that can cause Optometrist License discipline are:

    • Altering or Forging a Prescription
    • Assault With a Deadly Weapon
    • Battery
    • Brandishing a Firearm
    • Burglary
    • Carrying a Concealed Weapon
    • Child Abuse
    • Child Endangerment
    • Diverting a Controlled Substance
    • Domestic Violence
    • DUI
    • Elder Abuse
    • False Imprisonment
    • Forgery
    • Fraud
    • Hit & Run
    • Identity Theft
    • Insurance Fraud
    • Medicare Fraud
    • Mortgage Fraud
    • Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance
    • Possession of a Controlled Substance
    • Public Intoxication
    • Real Estate Fraud
    • Robbery
    • Sex Offenses
    • Theft
    • Trespass
    • Vandalism
    • Vehicular Manslaughter

    The California Board of Optometry and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Optometrists in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Optometrists engaged in Insurance Fraud, Unlawful Practice of Medicine and Unlawful Representation as a Physician. In serious criminal cases against Optometrists pending in Criminal Court, the California Board of Optometry and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Optometrist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend an Optometrist License in Criminal Court.

    Optometrists facing criminal charges and Optometrists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Optometrist License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Board of Optometry.

    California Optometrist License Statement of Issues Attorney

    The California Board of Optometry thoroughly investigates all applicants for Optometrist Licenses. The California Board of Optometry may deny a California Optometrist License to Optometrist students and Optometrists from other states and countries. Most California Optometrist License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Optometrist License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied an Optometrist License should contact a California Optometrist License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Board of Optometry Statement of Issues Hearing.

    California Optometrist Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

    A Petition for Reinstatement allows Optometrists who have received an Optometrist License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Optometrist License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Board of Optometry. A successful Optometrist License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Optometrist License Defense Attorney.

  • California Optician License Defense Attorney

    California Board of Optometry License Defense Lawyer

    The California Board of Optometry, known as the BOO, licenses several thousand Opticians in the State of California. Most California Opticians have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Board of Optometry. For Opticians who become part of the California Board of Optometry’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Optician License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Opticians facing the California Board of Optometry disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Optician License Defense Attorney.

    California Board of Optometry Investigation Defense Lawyer

    The majority of California Board of Optometry investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Board of Optometry Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Board of Optometry utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Opticians. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

    It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Board of Optometry disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Board of Optometry investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

    If you are an Optician facing a California Board of Optometry investigation, contact a California Optician License Defense Attorney for representation.

    California Optician License Accusation Defense Attorney

    A formal Accusation served on a California Optician serves as notice to an Optician that the Board intends to revoke the Optician License. The Optician, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Optician. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Optician License.

    An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of an Optician License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Opticians to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Board of Optometry. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

    Opticians facing a California Board of Optometry Accusation should contact an experienced California Optician License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Opticians include:

    • Accepting or Paying Referral Fees
    • Acting Outside Scope of Licensure
    • Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Optician Activity
    • Altering Medical Records
    • Dangerous Use of Alcohol or Drugs
    • Deceptive Advertising
    • Employing Cappers or Steerers
    • Employing Unlicensed Person
    • Failure to Follow Infection Control Guidelines
    • Failure to Maintain Adequate Records
    • Failure to Refer Patient
    • False Representations of Fact
    • Fraud, Misrepresentation or Dishonesty
    • Furnishing a Controlled Substance Without a Prescription
    • Gross Negligence
    • Incompetence
    • Mental or Physical Incapacity
    • Misconduct
    • Prohibited Arrangements by Opticians
    • Repeated Negligent Acts
    • Sexual Misconduct
    • Unlawful Location for Practice
    • Unlawful Referrals
    • Unlawful Solicitation
    • Unprofessional Conduct
    • Violation of Health & Safety Standards

    California Optician License Hearing Attorney

    The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

    The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Board of Optometry can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Board of Optometry’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows an Optician to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Optician can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

    California Opticians facing a California Board of Optometry Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Optician License Defense Lawyer.

    California Optician License and Criminal Convictions

    The California Board of Optometry can discipline Opticians for criminal convictions. California Board of Optometry discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of an Optician. Common criminal offenses that can cause Optician License discipline are:

    • Altering or Forging a Prescription
    • Assault With a Deadly Weapon
    • Battery
    • Brandishing a Firearm
    • Burglary
    • Carrying a Concealed Weapon
    • Child Abuse
    • Child Endangerment
    • Diverting a Controlled Substance
    • Domestic Violence
    • DUI
    • Elder Abuse
    • False Imprisonment
    • Forgery
    • Fraud
    • Hit & Run
    • Identity Theft
    • Insurance Fraud
    • Medicare Fraud
    • Mortgage Fraud
    • Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance
    • Possession of a Controlled Substance
    • Public Intoxication
    • Real Estate Fraud
    • Robbery
    • Sex Offenses
    • Theft
    • Trespass
    • Vandalism
    • Vehicular Manslaughter

    The California Board of Optometry and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Opticians in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Opticians engaged in Insurance Fraud, Unlawful Practice of Medicine, Unlawful Practice of Optometry and Unlawful Representation as a Physician. In serious criminal cases against Opticians pending in Criminal Court, the California Board of Optometry and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Optician. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend an Optician License in Criminal Court.

    Opticians facing criminal charges and Opticians who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Optician License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Board of Optometry.

    California Optician License Statement of Issues Attorney

    The California Board of Optometry thoroughly investigates all applicants for Optician Licenses. The California Board of Optometry may deny a California Optician License to Optician students and Opticians from other states and countries. Most California Optician License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Optician License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied an Optician License should contact a California Optician License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Board of Optometry Statement of Issues Hearing.

    California Optician Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

    A Petition for Reinstatement allows Opticians who have received an Optician License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Optician License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Board of Optometry. A successful Optician License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Optician License Defense Attorney.

  • California Occupational Therapy Assistant License Defense Attorney

    California Board of Occupational Therapy License Defense Lawyer

    The California Board of Occupational Therapy, known as the BOT, licenses approximately 1,000 Occupational Therapy Assistants in the State of California. Most California Occupational Therapy Assistants have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Board of Occupational Therapy. For Occupational Therapy Assistants who become part of the California Board of Occupational Therapy’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Occupational Therapy Assistant License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Occupational Therapy Assistants facing the California Board of Occupational Therapy disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Occupational Therapy Assistant License Defense Attorney.

    California Board of Occupational Therapy Investigation Defense Lawyer

    The majority of California Board of Occupational Therapy investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Board of Occupational Therapy Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Board of Occupational Therapy utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Occupational Therapy Assistants. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

    It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Board of Occupational Therapy disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Board of Occupational Therapy investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

    If you are an Occupational Therapy Assistant facing a California Board of Occupational Therapy investigation, contact a California Occupational Therapy Assistant License Defense Attorney for representation.

    California Occupational Therapy Assistant License Accusation Defense Attorney

    A formal Accusation served on a California Occupational Therapy Assistant serves as notice to an Occupational Therapy Assistant that the Board intends to revoke the Occupational Therapy Assistant License. The Occupational Therapy Assistant, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Occupational Therapy Assistant. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Occupational Therapy Assistant License.

    An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of an Occupational Therapy Assistant License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Occupational Therapy Assistants to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Board of Occupational Therapy. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

    Occupational Therapy Assistants facing a California Board of Occupational Therapy Accusation should contact an experienced California Occupational Therapy Assistant License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Occupational Therapy Assistants include:

    • Accepting or Paying Referral Fees
    • Acting Outside Scope of Licensure
    • Administering Controlled Substances
    • Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Occupational Therapist Activity
    • Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Occupational Therapy Assistant Activity
    • Altering Prescriptions
    • Committing Fraud, Dishonest or a Corrupt Act
    • Dangerous Use of Alcohol or Drugs
    • Discrimination
    • Excessive Force Against Patient
    • Failing to Follow Infection Control Guidelines
    • Failure to Maintain Adequate Records
    • Failure to Maintain Patient Confidentiality
    • False Advertising
    • Falsifying Verbal or Written Orders
    • Fraudulent Claims
    • Gross Negligence
    • Incompetence
    • Mistreating or Abusing Patient
    • Patient Record Violations
    • Repeated Negligent Acts
    • Sexual Misconduct
    • Unprofessional Conduct
    • Violation of the Occupational Therapy Practicing Act

    California Occupational Therapy Assistant License Hearing Attorney

    The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

    The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Board of Occupational Therapy can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Board of Occupational Therapy’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows an Occupational Therapy Assistant to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Occupational Therapy Assistant can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

    California Occupational Therapy Assistants facing a California Board of Occupational Therapy Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Occupational Therapy Assistant License Defense Lawyer.

    California Occupational Therapy Assistant License and Criminal Convictions

    The California Board of Occupational Therapy can discipline Occupational Therapy Assistants for criminal convictions. California Board of Occupational Therapy discipline occurs for convictions for crimes involving moral turpitude. Discipline also occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of an Occupational Therapy Assistant. Common criminal offenses that can cause Occupational Therapy Assistant License discipline are:

    • Altering or Forging a Prescription
    • Assault With a Deadly Weapon
    • Battery
    • Brandishing a Firearm
    • Burglary
    • Carrying a Concealed Weapon
    • Child Abuse
    • Child Endangerment
    • Diverting a Controlled Substance
    • Domestic Violence
    • DUI
    • Elder Abuse
    • False Imprisonment
    • Forgery
    • Fraud
    • Hit & Run
    • Identity Theft
    • Insurance Fraud
    • Medicare Fraud
    • Mortgage Fraud
    • Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance
    • Possession of a Controlled Substance
    • Public Intoxication
    • Real Estate Fraud
    • Robbery
    • Sex Offenses
    • Theft
    • Trespass
    • Vandalism
    • Vehicular Manslaughter

    The California Board of Occupational Therapy and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Occupational Therapy Assistants in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Occupational Therapy Assistants engaged in Insurance Fraud, Unlawful Practice of Medicine and Unlawful Representation of a Physician. In serious criminal cases against Occupational Therapy Assistants pending in Criminal Court, the California Board of Occupational Therapy and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Occupational Therapy Assistant. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend an Occupational Therapy Assistant License in Criminal Court.

    Occupational Therapy Assistants facing criminal charges and Occupational Therapy Assistants who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Occupational Therapy Assistant License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Board of Occupational Therapy.

    California Occupational Therapy Assistant License Statement of Issues Attorney

    The California Board of Occupational Therapy thoroughly investigates all applicants for Occupational Therapy Assistant Licenses. The California Board of Occupational Therapy may deny a California Occupational Therapy Assistant License to Occupational Therapy Assistant students and Occupational Therapy Assistants from other states and countries. Most California Occupational Therapy Assistant License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Occupational Therapy Assistant License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied an Occupational Therapy Assistant License should contact a California Occupational Therapy Assistant License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Board of Occupational Therapy Statement of Issues Hearing.

    California Occupational Therapy Assistant Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

    A Petition for Reinstatement allows Occupational Therapy Assistants who have received an Occupational Therapy Assistant License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Occupational Therapy Assistant License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Board of Occupational Therapy. A successful Occupational Therapy Assistant License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Occupational Therapy Assistant License Defense Attorney.

  • California Occupational Therapist License Defense Attorney

    California Board of Occupational Therapy License Defense Lawyer

    The California Board of Occupational Therapy, known as the BOT, licenses approximately 5,000 Occupational Therapists in the State of California. Most California Occupational Therapists have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Board of Occupational Therapy. For Occupational Therapists who become part of the California Board of Occupational Therapy’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Occupational Therapist License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Occupational Therapists facing the California Board of Occupational Therapy disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Occupational Therapist License Defense Attorney.

    California Board of Occupational Therapy Investigation Defense Lawyer

    The majority of California Board of Occupational Therapy investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Board of Occupational Therapy Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Board of Occupational Therapy utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Occupational Therapists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

    It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Board of Occupational Therapy disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Board of Occupational Therapy investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

    If you are an Occupational Therapist facing a California Board of Occupational Therapy investigation, contact a California Occupational Therapist License Defense Attorney for representation.

    California Occupational Therapist License Accusation Defense Attorney

    A formal Accusation served on a California Occupational Therapist serves as notice to an Occupational Therapist that the Board intends to revoke the Occupational Therapist License. The Occupational Therapist, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Occupational Therapist. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Occupational Therapist License.

    An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of an Occupational Therapist License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Occupational Therapists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Board of Occupational Therapy. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

    Occupational Therapists facing a California Board of Occupational Therapy Accusation should contact an experienced California Occupational Therapist License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Occupational Therapists include:

    • Accepting or Paying Referral Fees
    • Acting Outside Scope of Licensure
    • Administering Controlled Substances
    • Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Occupational Therapist Activity
    • Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Occupational Therapy Assistant Activity
    • Altering Prescriptions
    • Committing Fraud, Dishonest or a Corrupt Act
    • Dangerous Use of Alcohol or Drugs
    • Discrimination
    • Excessive Force Against Patient
    • Failing to Follow Infection Control Guidelines
    • Failure to Maintain Adequate Records
    • Failure to Maintain Patient Confidentiality
    • False Advertising
    • Falsifying Verbal or Written Orders
    • Fraudulent Claims
    • Gross Negligence
    • Incompetence
    • Mistreating or Abusing Patient
    • Patient Record Violations
    • Repeated Negligent Acts
    • Sexual Misconduct
    • Unprofessional Conduct
    • Violation of the Occupational Therapy Practicing Act

    California Occupational Therapist License Hearing Attorney

    The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

    The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Board of Occupational Therapy can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Board of Occupational Therapy’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows an Occupational Therapist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Occupational Therapist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

    California Occupational Therapists facing a California Board of Occupational Therapy Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Occupational Therapist License Defense Lawyer.

    California Occupational Therapist License and Criminal Convictions

    The California Board of Occupational Therapy can discipline Occupational Therapists for criminal convictions. California Board of Occupational Therapy discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of an Occupational Therapist. Common criminal offenses that can cause Occupational Therapist License discipline are:

    • Altering or Forging a Prescription
    • Assault With a Deadly Weapon
    • Battery
    • Brandishing a Firearm
    • Burglary
    • Carrying a Concealed Weapon
    • Child Abuse
    • Child Endangerment
    • Diverting a Controlled Substance
    • Domestic Violence
    • DUI
    • Elder Abuse
    • False Imprisonment
    • Forgery
    • Fraud
    • Hit & Run
    • Identity Theft
    • Insurance Fraud
    • Medicare Fraud
    • Mortgage Fraud
    • Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance
    • Possession of a Controlled Substance
    • Public Intoxication
    • Real Estate Fraud
    • Robbery
    • Sex Offenses
    • Theft
    • Trespass
    • Vandalism
    • Vehicular Manslaughter

    The California Board of Occupational Therapy and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Occupational Therapists in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Occupational Therapists engaged in Insurance Fraud, Unlawful Practice of Medicine and Unlawful Representation as a Physician. In serious criminal cases against Occupational Therapists pending in Criminal Court, the California Board of Occupational Therapy and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Occupational Therapist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend an Occupational Therapist License in Criminal Court.

    Occupational Therapists facing criminal charges and Occupational Therapists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Occupational Therapist License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Board of Occupational Therapy.

    California Occupational Therapist License Statement of Issues Attorney

    The California Board of Occupational Therapy thoroughly investigates all applicants for Occupational Therapist Licenses. The California Board of Occupational Therapy may deny a California Occupational Therapist License to Occupational Therapist students and Occupational Therapists from other states and countries. Most California Occupational Therapist License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Occupational Therapist License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied an Occupational Therapist License should contact a California Occupational Therapist License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Board of Occupational Therapy Statement of Issues Hearing.

    California Occupational Therapist Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

    A Petition for Reinstatement allows Occupational Therapists who have received an Occupational Therapist License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Occupational Therapist License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Board of Occupational Therapy. A successful Occupational Therapist License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Occupational Therapist License Defense Attorney.

  • California Notary Public License Defense Attorney

    California Secretary of State’s Office of Notary Public License Defense Lawyer

    The California Secretary of State, known as SOS, licenses thousands of Notary Publics in the State of California. Most California Notary Publics have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Secretary of State. For Notary Publics who become part of the California Secretary of State’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Notary Public License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Notary Publics facing the California Secretary of State disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Notary Public License Defense Attorney.

    California Secretary of State Investigation Defense Lawyer

    The majority of California Secretary of State investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Secretary of State Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Secretary of State employs non sworn Enforcement Representatives to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Secretary of State’s Office of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Notary Publics. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

    It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Secretary of State disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Secretary of State investigation, the Secretary of State’s Office has several options. The Secretary of State’s Office can choose to close the Complaint. The Secretary of State’s Office can choose to issue a Citation. The Secretary of State’s Office can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The California Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Secretary of State’s Office may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

    If you are a Notary Public Licensee facing a California Secretary of State investigation, contact a California Notary Public License Defense Attorney for representation.

    California Notary Public License Accusation Defense Attorney

    A formal Accusation served on a California Notary Public Licensee serves as notice to a Notary Public that the Secretary of State’s Office intends to revoke the Notary Publics’ License. The Notary Public, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Notary Public. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Notary Publics’ License.

    An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Notary Public License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Notary Publics to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Secretary of State. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

    Notary Publics facing a California Secretary of State Accusation should contact an experienced California Notary Public License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Notary Publics include:

    • Accepting or Paying Referral Fees
    • Advertising in a Language Other than English
    • Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Notary Public Activity
    • Charging More Than The Prescribed Fees
    • Civil Judgment Related to Practice of Notary Services
    • Dishonesty, Fraud or Deceit
    • Execution of Certificate Bearing False Information
    • Failure to Administer the Oath or Affirmation
    • Failure to Complete the Acknowledgement
    • Failure to Discharge the Duties or Responsibilities of a Notary Public
    • Failure to Satisfy Court Judgment
    • Failure to Secure Journal or Official Seal
    • Practice of Law Without a License
    • Use of False or Misleading Advertising
    • Violating Government Code § 8223: Immigration Matters
    • Willful Failure to Provide Records

    California Notary Public License Hearing Attorney

    The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

    The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Secretary of State can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Secretary of State’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Notary Public to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Notary Public can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

    California Notary Publics facing a California Secretary of State Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Notary Public License Defense Lawyer.

    California Notary Public License and Criminal Convictions

    The California Secretary of State can discipline Notary Publics for criminal convictions. California Secretary of State discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Notary Public. Common criminal offenses that can cause Notary Public License discipline are:

    • Altering or Forging a Prescription
    • Assault With a Deadly Weapon
    • Battery
    • Brandishing a Firearm
    • Burglary
    • Carrying a Concealed Weapon
    • Child Abuse
    • Child Endangerment
    • Diverting a Controlled Substance
    • Domestic Violence
    • DUI
    • Elder Abuse
    • False Imprisonment
    • Forgery
    • Fraud
    • Hit & Run
    • Identity Theft
    • Insurance Fraud
    • Medicare Fraud
    • Mortgage Fraud
    • Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance
    • Possession of a Controlled Substance
    • Public Intoxication
    • Real Estate Fraud
    • Robbery
    • Sex Offenses
    • Theft
    • Trespass
    • Vandalism
    • Vehicular Manslaughter

    The California Secretary of State and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Notary Publics in the course and scope of their trade. Criminal investigations often involve Notary Publics engaged in Elder Financial Abuse, Forgery Fraud and Theft. In serious criminal cases against Notary Publics pending in Criminal Court, the California Secretary of State and the Secretary of State Legal Division may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Notary Public. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Notary Public License in Criminal Court.

    Notary Publics facing criminal charges and Notary Publics who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Notary Public License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Secretary of State.

    California Notary Public License Statement of Issues Attorney

    The California Secretary of State thoroughly investigates all applicants for Notary Public Licenses. The California Secretary of State may deny a California Notary Public License for a variety of reasons. Most California Notary Public License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Notary Public License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Notary Public License should contact a California Notary Public License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Secretary of State Statement of Issues Hearing.

    California Notary Public License Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

    A Petition for Reinstatement allows Notary Publics who have received a Notary Public License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Notary Public License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Secretary of State. A successful Notary Public License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Notary Public License Defense Attorney.

  • California NMLS License Defense Attorney

    California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation License Defense Lawyer

    The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, known as DFPI, licenses several hundred thousand NMLS (National Mortgage Licensing System) Licensees in the State of California. Most California NMLS Licensees have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. For NMLS Licensees who become part of the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The NMLS License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. NMLS Licensees facing the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California NMLS License Defense Attorney.

    California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Investigation Defense Lawyer

    The majority of California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation employs non sworn Enforcement Representatives to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against NMLS Licensees. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

    It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation investigation, the Department has several options. The Department can choose to close the Complaint. The Department can choose to issue a Citation. The Department can also choose to refer the matter to the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Legal Division. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Legal Division will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Department may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

    If you are an NMLS Licensee facing a California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation investigation, contact a California Department of NMLS License Defense Attorney for representation.

    California NMLS License Accusation Defense Attorney

    A formal Accusation served on a California NMLS Licensee serves as notice to an NMLS that the Department intends to revoke the NMLS Licensees’ License. The NMLS, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the NMLS. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the NMLS Licensees’ License.

    An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of an NMLS License in California. In many cases, it is possible for NMLS Licensees to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

    NMLS Licensees facing a California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Accusation should contact an experienced California NMLS License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against NMLS Licensees include:

    • Accepting or Paying Referral Fees
    • Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Mortgage Loan Origination
    • California Finance Lenders Law (CFLL) Violations
    • California Residential Mortgage Lending Act (CRMLA) Violations
    • Dishonesty, Fraud or Deceit
    • Elder Abuse
    • Failure to Report Violations
    • Home Loan Modification Violations
    • Incompetence
    • Misrepresentation
    • Negligence
    • Repeated Acts of Negligence
    • SAFE Act Violations
    • Unprofessional Conduct

    California NMLS License Hearing Attorney

    The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

    The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows an NMLS to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the NMLS can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

    California NMLS Licensees facing a California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California NMLS License Defense Lawyer.

    California NMLS License and Criminal Convictions

    The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation can discipline NMLS Licensees for criminal convictions. California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of an NMLS. Common criminal offenses that can cause NMLS License discipline are:

    • Altering or Forging a Prescription
    • Assault With a Deadly Weapon
    • Battery
    • Brandishing a Firearm
    • Burglary
    • Carrying a Concealed Weapon
    • Child Abuse
    • Child Endangerment
    • Diverting a Controlled Substance
    • Domestic Violence
    • DUI
    • Elder Abuse
    • False Imprisonment
    • Forgery
    • Fraud
    • Hit & Run
    • Identity Theft
    • Insurance Fraud
    • Medicare Fraud
    • Mortgage Fraud
    • Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance
    • Possession of a Controlled Substance
    • Public Intoxication
    • Real Estate Fraud
    • Robbery
    • Sex Offenses
    • Theft
    • Trespass
    • Vandalism
    • Vehicular Manslaughter

    The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by NMLS Licensees in the course and scope of their trade. Criminal investigations often involve NMLS Licensees engaged in Elder Financial Abuse, Forgery, Fraud and Theft. In serious criminal cases against NMLS Licensees pending in Criminal Court, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation and the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation’s Legal Division may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the NMLS. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend an NMLS License in Criminal Court.

    NMLS Licensees facing criminal charges and NMLS Licensees who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California NMLS License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation.

    California NMLS License Statement of Issues Attorney

    The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation thoroughly investigates all applicants for NMLS Licenses. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation may deny a California NMLS License for a variety of reasons. Most California NMLS License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the NMLS License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied an NMLS License should contact a California NMLS License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Statement of Issues Hearing.

    California NMLS License Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

    A Petition for Reinstatement allows NMLS Licensees who have received an NMLS License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the NMLS License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. A successful NMLS License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California NMLS License Defense Attorney.