Blog

California Department of Professional Fiduciary License Defense Lawyer

The California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau, known as PFB, licenses several hundred thousand Professional Fiduciaries in the State of California. Most California Professional Fiduciaries have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau. For Professional Fiduciaries who become part of the California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Professional Fiduciary License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Professional Fiduciaries facing the California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Professional Fiduciary License Defense Attorney.

California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau employs non sworn Enforcement Representatives to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Professional Fiduciaries. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau investigation, the Bureau has several options. The Bureau can choose to close the Complaint. The Bureau can choose to issue a Citation. The Bureau can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The California Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Bureau may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

If you are a Professional Fiduciary Licensee facing a California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau investigation, contact a California Professional Fiduciary License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Professional Fiduciary License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Professional Fiduciary Licensee serves as notice to a Professional Fiduciary that the Department intends to revoke the Professional Fiduciaries’ License. The Professional Fiduciary, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Professional Fiduciary. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Professional Fiduciaries’ License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Professional Fiduciary License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Professional Fiduciaries to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the California Attorney General’s Office. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Professional Fiduciaries facing a California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau should contact an experienced California Professional Fiduciary License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Professional Fiduciaries include:

Accepting or Paying Referral Fees Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Professional Fiduciary Activity Dishonest, Corrupt or Fraudulent Act Gross Negligence

Failure to Maintain Adequate Records Failure to Pay Civil Penalty Failure to Pay Court Sanctions Improper Advertising

Incompetence Unprofessional Conduct Violation of Professional Fiduciaries Act Willful Violation of Duty

California Professional Fiduciary License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Professional Fiduciary to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Professional Fiduciary can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

California Professional Fiduciaries facing a California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Professional Fiduciary License Defense Lawyer.

California Professional Fiduciary License and Criminal Convictions

The California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau can discipline Professional Fiduciaries for criminal convictions. California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Professional Fiduciary. Common criminal offenses that can cause Professional Fiduciary License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Professional Fiduciaries in the course and scope of their trade. Criminal investigations often involve Professional Fiduciaries engaged in Elder Abuse, Forgery, Fraud and Theft. In serious criminal cases against Professional Fiduciaries pending in Criminal Court, the California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Professional Fiduciary. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Professional Fiduciary License in Criminal Court.

Professional Fiduciaries facing criminal charges and Professional Fiduciaries who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Professional Fiduciary License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau.

California Professional Fiduciary License Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau thoroughly investigates all applicants for Professional Fiduciary Licenses. The California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau may deny a California Professional Fiduciary License for a variety of reasons. Most California Professional Fiduciary License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Professional Fiduciary License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Professional Fiduciary License should contact a California Professional Fiduciary License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Professional Fiduciary License Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Professional Fiduciaries who have received a Professional Fiduciary License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Professional Fiduciary License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau. A successful Professional Fiduciary License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Professional Fiduciary License Defense Attorney.

California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services License Defense Lawyer

The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services, known as BSIS, licenses Private Patrol Operators, or PPOs, in the State of California. Most California Private Patrol Operators have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. For Private Patrol Operators who become part of the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services’ disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Private Patrol Operator License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Private Patrol Operators facing the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Private Patrol Operator License Defense Attorney.

California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services employs non sworn Program Representatives to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Private Patrol Operators. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services investigation, the Bureau has several options. The Bureau can choose to close the Complaint. The Bureau can choose to issue a Citation. The Bureau can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The California Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Bureau may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

If you are a Private Patrol Operator Licensee facing a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services investigation, contact a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services License Defense Attorney for representation.

California PPO License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Private Patrol Operator Licensee serves as notice to a Private Patrol Operator that the Bureau intends to revoke the Private Patrol Operators’ License. The Private Patrol Operator, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Private Patrol Operator. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Private Patrol Operators License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Private Patrol Operator License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Private Patrol Operators to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Private Patrol Operators facing a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Accusation should contact an experienced California Private Patrol Operator License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Private Patrol Operators include:

Accepting or Paying Referral Fees Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Private Patrol Operator Activity Employing Unregistered Security Guards

Failure to Maintain Adequate Records Failure to Maintain Weapons Records Failure to Supervise Employees Fraud Improper Advertising

Improper Employee Training Knowingly Making a False Report Misrepresentation Renting a Private Patrol Operator License Use of Force

California Private Patrol Operator License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services’ action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Private Patrol Operator to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Private Patrol Operator can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

California Private Patrol Operators facing a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Private Patrol Operator License Defense Lawyer.

California PPO License and Criminal Convictions

The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services can discipline Private Patrol Operator owners, corporate officers and staff members for criminal convictions. California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Private Patrol Operator owner, corporate officer or staff member. Common criminal offenses that can cause Private Patrol Operator License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Private Patrol Operator staff members in the course and scope of their trade. Criminal investigations often involve Private Patrol Operator staff members engaged in Burglary, Fraud and Theft. In serious criminal cases against Private Patrol Operator staff members pending in Criminal Court, the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Private Patrol Operators’ staff members. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Private Patrol Operator License and bar staff members from facilities in Criminal Court.

Private Patrol Operator owners, corporate officers, and staff members facing criminal charges and Private Patrol Operators who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Private Patrol Operator License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services.

California Private Patrol Operator License Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services thoroughly investigates all applicants for Private Patrol Operator Licenses. The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services may deny a California Private Patrol Operator License for a variety of reasons. Most California Private Patrol Operator License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Private Patrol Operator License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Private Patrol Operator License should contact a California Private Patrol Operator License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Statement of Issues Hearing.

California PPO License Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Private Patrol Operators who have received a Private Patrol Operator License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Private Patrol Operator License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. A successful Private Patrol Operator License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Private Patrol Operator License Defense Attorney.

California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services License Defense Lawyer

The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services, known as the BSIS, Licenses approximately 10,000 Private Investigators in the State of California. Most California Private Investigators have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. For Private Investigators who become part of the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services’ disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Private Investigator License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Private Investigators facing the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Private Investigator License Defense Attorney.

California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Private Investigators. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services investigation, the Bureau has several options. The Bureau can choose to close the Complaint. The Bureau can choose to issue a Citation. The Bureau can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Bureau may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

If you are a Private Investigator facing a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services investigation, contact a California Private Investigator License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Private Investigator License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Private Investigator serves as notice to a Private Investigator that the Bureau intends to revoke the Private Investigator License. The Private Investigator, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Private Investigator. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Private Investigator License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Private Investigator License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Private Investigators to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Private Investigators facing a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Accusation should contact an experienced California Private Investigator License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Private Investigators include:

Accepting or Paying Referral Fees Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Private Investigator Activity Acting Outside the Scope of Private Investigator Licensing Committing Assault or Battery on a Citizen Deceit

Elder Abuse Failure to Maintain Adequate Records False Imprisonment Firearms Violations Fraud Improper Advertising Kidnapping Knowingly Making a False Report

Misrepresentation Operating as an Unlicensed PPO Operating as an Unlicensed Security Guard Unlawful Use of Force Unlawful Use of a Weapon Unprofessional Conduct Weapons Violations

California Private Investigator License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services’ action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Private Investigator to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Private Investigator can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

California Private Investigators facing a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Private Investigator License Defense Lawyer.

California Private Investigator License and Criminal Convictions

The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services can discipline Private Investigators for criminal convictions. California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Private Investigator. Common criminal offenses that can cause Private Investigator License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Private Investigators in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Private Investigators engaged in Assault, Battery, Burglary, False Imprisonment, Firearms Violations, Kidnapping, Trespass, Stalking and Robbery. In serious criminal cases against Private Investigators pending in Criminal Court, the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Private Investigator. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Private Investigator License in Criminal Court.

Private Investigators facing criminal charges and Private Investigators who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Private Investigator License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services.

California Private Investigator License Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services thoroughly investigates all applicants for Private Investigator Licenses. The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services may deny a California Private Investigator License to Private Investigator students and Private Investigators from other states and countries. Most California Private Investigator License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Private Investigator License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Private Investigator License should contact a California Private Investigator License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Private Investigator Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Private Investigators who have received a Private Investigator License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Private Investigator License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. A successful Private Investigator License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Private Investigator License Defense Attorney.

California Department of Social Services License Defense Lawyer

The California Department of Social Services, known as CDSS, licenses Preschools in the State of California. Most California Preschools have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Department of Social Services. For Preschools who become part of the California Department of Social Services’ disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Preschool License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Preschools facing the California Department of Social Services disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Preschool License Defense Attorney.

California Department of Social Services Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Department of Social Services investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Department of Social Services Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Department of Social Services employs non sworn Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Social Services employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Preschools. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Department of Social Services disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Department of Social Services investigation, the Department has several options. The Department can choose to close the Complaint. The Department can choose to issue a Citation. The Department can also choose to refer the matter to the California Department of Social Services Legal Division. The California Department of Social Services Legal Division will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Department may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

If you are a Preschool Licensee facing a California Department of Social Services investigation, contact a California Department of Social Services License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Preschool License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Preschool Licensee serves as notice to a Preschool that the Department intends to revoke the Preschools’ License. The Preschool, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Preschool. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Preschools License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Preschool License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Preschools to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the California Department of Social Services. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Preschools facing a California Department of Social Services Accusation should contact an experienced California Preschool License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Preschools include:

Conduct Inimical Child Abuse Child Endangerment Failure to Provide Care and Supervision Failure to Provide Adequate Medical Care

Health & Safety Code Violations Improper Staff to Client Ratio Improper Storage of Toxic Substances Lack of Disaster Plan Lack of Food Lack of Supervision

Municipal Code Violations Negligence Overcapacity Physical Abuse Verbal Abuse Violation of Personal Rights

California Preschool License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Department of Social Services can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Department of Social Services’ action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Preschool to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Preschool can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

California Preschools facing a California Department of Social Services Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Preschool License Defense Lawyer.

California Preschool License and Criminal Convictions

The California Department of Social Services can discipline Preschool owners, corporate officers and staff members for criminal convictions. California Department of Social Services discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Preschool owner, corporate officer or staff member. Common criminal offenses that can cause Preschool License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Department of Social Services and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Preschool staff members in the course and scope of their trade. Criminal investigations often involve Preschool staff members engaged in Child Abuse and Child Endangerment. In serious criminal cases against Preschool staff members pending in Criminal Court, the California Department of Social Services and the Department of Social Services Legal Division may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Preschools’ staff members. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Preschool License and bar staff members from facilities in Criminal Court.

Preschool owners, corporate officers, and staff members facing criminal charges and Preschools who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Preschool License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Department of Social Services.

California Preschool License Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Department of Social Services thoroughly investigates all applicants for Preschool Licenses. The California Department of Social Services may deny a California Preschool License for a variety of reasons. Most California Preschool License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Preschool License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Preschool License should contact a California Preschool License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Department of Social Services Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Preschool License Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Preschools who have received a Preschool License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Preschool License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Department of Social Services. A successful Preschool License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Preschool License Defense Attorney.

California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services License Defense Lawyer

The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services, known as BSIS, licenses Proprietary Private Security Employers in the State of California. Most California Proprietary Private Security Employers have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. For Proprietary Private Security Employers who become part of the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services’ disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Proprietary Private Security Employer License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Proprietary Private Security Employers facing the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Proprietary Private Security Employer License Defense Attorney.

California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services employs non sworn Program Representatives to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Proprietary Private Security Employers. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services investigation, the Bureau has several options. The Bureau can choose to close the Complaint. The Bureau can choose to issue a Citation. The Bureau can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The California Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Bureau may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

If you are a Proprietary Private Security Employer Licensee facing a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services investigation, contact a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Proprietary Private Security Employer License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Proprietary Private Security Employer Licensee serves as notice to a Proprietary Private Security Employer that the Bureau intends to revoke the Proprietary Private Security Employers’ License. The Proprietary Private Security Employer, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Proprietary Private Security Employer. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Proprietary Private Security Employers License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Proprietary Private Security Employer License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Proprietary Private Security Employers to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Proprietary Private Security Employers facing a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Accusation should contact an experienced California Proprietary Private Security Employer License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Proprietary Private Security Employers include:

Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Private Patrol Operator Activity Employing Unregistered Security Guards Failure to Maintain Adequate Records

Failure to Maintain Weapons Records Failure to Supervise Employees Fraud Improper Advertising

Improper Employee Training Knowingly Making a False Report Misrepresentation Renting a Private Patrol Operator License Use of Force

California Proprietary Private Security Employer License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services’ action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Proprietary Private Security Employer to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Proprietary Private Security Employer can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

California Proprietary Private Security Employers facing a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Proprietary Private Security Employer License Defense Lawyer.

California Proprietary Private Security Employer License and Criminal Convictions

The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services can discipline Proprietary Private Security Employer owners, corporate officers and staff members for criminal convictions. California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Proprietary Private Security Employer owner, corporate officer or staff member. Common criminal offenses that can cause Proprietary Private Security Employer License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Proprietary Private Security Employer staff members in the course and scope of their trade. Criminal investigations often involve Proprietary Private Security Employer staff members engaged in Acting as a PPO Without a License, Burglary, Fraud and Theft. In serious criminal cases against Proprietary Private Security Employer staff members pending in Criminal Court, the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Proprietary Private Security Employers’ staff members. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Proprietary Private Security Employer License and bar staff members from facilities in Criminal Court.

Proprietary Private Security Employer owners, corporate officers, and staff members facing criminal charges and Proprietary Private Security Employers who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Proprietary Private Security Employer License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services.

California Proprietary Private Security Employer License Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services thoroughly investigates all applicants for Proprietary Private Security Employer Licenses. The California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services may deny a California Proprietary Private Security Employer License for a variety of reasons. Most California Proprietary Private Security Employer License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Proprietary Private Security Employer License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Proprietary Private Security Employer License should contact a California Proprietary Private Security Employer License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Proprietary Private Security Employer License Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Proprietary Private Security Employers who have received a Proprietary Private Security Employer License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Proprietary Private Security Employer License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. A successful Proprietary Private Security Employer License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Proprietary Private Security Employer License Defense Attorney.

Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer

The Medical Board of California, known as the MCB, licenses several thousand Polysomnographic Technologists in the State of California. Most California Polysomnographic Technologists have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the Medical Board of California. For Polysomnographic Technologists who become part of the Medical Board of California’ disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Polysomnographic Technologist License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Polysomnographic Technologists facing the Medical Board of California disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Polysomnographic Technologist License Defense Attorney.

Medical Board of California Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Medical Board of California investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Medical Board of California Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Medical Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Polysomnographic Technologists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the Medical Board of California disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a Medical Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

If you are a Polysomnographic Technologist facing a Medical Board of California investigation, contact a California Polysomnographic Technologist License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Polysomnographic Technologist License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Polysomnographic Technologist serves as notice to a Polysomnographic Technologist that the Board intends to revoke the Polysomnographic Technologist License. The Polysomnographic Technologist, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Polysomnographic Technologist. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Polysomnographic Technologist License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Polysomnographic Technologist License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Polysomnographic Technologists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Medical Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Polysomnographic Technologists facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Polysomnographic Technologist License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Polysomnographic Technologists include:

Accepting or Paying Referral Fees Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Polysomnographic Technologist Activity Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Practice of Medicine

Dishonest, Corrupt or Fraudulent Act Gross Negligence Practice Outside Fields of Competence Repeated Negligent Acts Sexual Misconduct to a Patient

Unprofessional Conduct Use of a Controlled Substance or Alcohol in a Dangerous Manner Violation of Confidentiality Violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct

California Polysomnographic Technologist License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Medical Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Medical Board of California’ action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Polysomnographic Technologist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Polysomnographic Technologist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

California Polysomnographic Technologists facing a Medical Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Polysomnographic Technologist License Defense Lawyer.

California Polysomnographic Technologist License and Criminal Convictions

The Medical Board of California can discipline Polysomnographic Technologists for criminal convictions. Medical Board of California discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Polysomnographic Technologist. Common criminal offenses that can cause Polysomnographic Technologist License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Polysomnographic Technologists in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Polysomnographic Technologists engaged in Criminal investigations often involve Physician Assistants engaged in Unlawful Practice of Medicine and Unlawful Representation as a Physician. In serious criminal cases against Polysomnographic Technologists pending in Criminal Court, the Medical Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Polysomnographic Technologist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Polysomnographic Technologist License in Criminal Court.

Polysomnographic Technologists facing criminal charges and Polysomnographic Technologists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Polysomnographic Technologist License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Medical Board of California.

California Polysomnographic Technologist License Statement of Issues Attorney

The Medical Board of California thoroughly investigates all applicants for Polysomnographic Technologist Licenses. The Medical Board of California may deny a California Polysomnographic Technologist License to Polysomnographic Technologist students and Polysomnographic Technologists from other states and countries. Most California Polysomnographic Technologist License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Polysomnographic Technologist License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Polysomnographic Technologist License should contact a California Polysomnographic Technologist License Denial Lawyer for representation in a Medical Board of California Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Polysomnographic Technologist Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Polysomnographic Technologists who have received a Polysomnographic Technologist License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Polysomnographic Technologist License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the Medical Board of California. A successful Polysomnographic Technologist License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Polysomnographic Technologist License Defense Attorney.

California Board of Podiatric Medicine License Defense Lawyer

The California Board of Podiatric Medicine, known as the BPM, licenses approximately 2,300 Podiatrists in the State of California. Most California Podiatrists have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Board of Podiatric Medicine. For Podiatrists who become part of the California Board of Podiatric Medicine’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Podiatrist License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Podiatrists facing the California Board of Podiatric Medicine disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Podiatrist License Defense Attorney.

California Board of Podiatric Medicine Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Board of Podiatric Medicine investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Board of Podiatric Medicine Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Board of Podiatric Medicine utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Podiatrists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Board of Podiatric Medicine disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Board of Podiatric Medicine investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

If you are a Podiatrist facing a California Board of Podiatric Medicine investigation, contact a California Podiatrist License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Podiatrist License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Podiatrist serves as notice to a Podiatrist that the Board intends to revoke the Podiatrist License. The Podiatrist, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Podiatrist. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Podiatrist License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Podiatrist License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Podiatrists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Board of Podiatric Medicine. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Podiatrists facing a California Board of Podiatric Medicine Accusation should contact an experienced California Podiatrist License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Podiatrists include:

Accepting or Paying Referral Fees Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Practice of Podiatry Alteration of Medical Records Dangerous Use of Alcohol Dangerous Use of Narcotics Dishonesty Excessive Prescribing

Excessive Treatments Failure to Maintain Adequate Records Gross Negligence Incompetence Insurance Fraud Making or Signing False Documents Misleading Advertising

Prescribing to an Addict Prescribing Without an Examination Repeated Negligent Acts Sexual Misconduct Sexual Exploitation Unprofessional Conduct Violation of Drug Statutes

California Podiatrist License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Board of Podiatric Medicine can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Board of Podiatric Medicine’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Podiatrist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Podiatrist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

California Podiatrists facing a California Board of Podiatric Medicine Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Podiatrist License Defense Lawyer.

California Podiatrist License and Criminal Convictions

The California Board of Podiatric Medicine can discipline Podiatrists for criminal convictions. California Board of Podiatric Medicine discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Podiatrist. Common criminal offenses that can cause Podiatrist License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Board of Podiatric Medicine and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Podiatrists in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Podiatrists engaged in Insurance Fraud, Unlawful Practice of Medicine and Unlawful Representation as a Physician. In serious criminal cases against Podiatrists pending in Criminal Court, the California Board of Podiatric Medicine and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Podiatrist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Podiatrist License in Criminal Court.

Podiatrists facing criminal charges and Podiatrists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Podiatrist License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Board of Podiatric Medicine.

California Podiatrist License Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Board of Podiatric Medicine thoroughly investigates all applicants for Podiatrist Licenses. The California Board of Podiatric Medicine may deny a California Podiatrist License to Podiatrist students and Podiatrists from other states and countries. Most California Podiatrist License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Podiatrist License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Podiatrist License should contact a California Podiatrist License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Board of Podiatric Medicine Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Podiatrist Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Podiatrists who have received a Podiatrist License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Podiatrist License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Board of Podiatric Medicine. A successful Podiatrist License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Podiatrist License Defense Attorney.

Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer

The Medical Board of California, known as the MBC, licenses approximately 120,000 Physicians in the State of California. Most California Physicians have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the Medical Board of California. For Physicians who become part of the Medical Board of California’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Physician License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Physicians facing the Medical Board of California disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney.

• For a list of Physician License Defense case results, please check out the Physician License Defense case results page.

Medical Board of California Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Medical Board of California investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Medical Board of California Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Medical Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Doctors. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the Medical Board of California disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a Medical Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Physician facing a Medical Board of California investigation, contact a Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Physician serves as notice to a Physician that the Board intends to revoke the Physician License. The Physician, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Physician. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Physician License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Physician License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Doctors to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Medical Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Doctors facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation. Physicians facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Physicians include:

Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Practice of Medicine Altering Medical Records Dishonesty Related to Patient Care Excessive Prescribing of Narcotics Excessive Treatments Excessive Use of Alcohol

Excessive Use of Controlled Substances Failure to Maintain Adequate Records Gross Negligence Incompetence Misleading Advertising Practicing Under the Influence of Alcohol

Practicing Under the Influence of Narcotics Prescribing to Addicts Prescribing Without Appropriate Examination Repeated Negligent Acts Sexual Misconduct Unprofessional Conduct

California Physician License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Medical Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Medical Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Doctor to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physician can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Physicians facing a Medical Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Doctor License and Criminal Convictions

The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for criminal convictions. Medical Board of California discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Physician. The Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Doctors in the course and scope of their practice. Common criminal offenses that can cause Physician License discipline are:

• Diverting a Controlled Substance
• Domestic Violence
• DUI
• Healthcare Fraud
• Insurance Fraud
• Medi-Cal Fraud
• Medicare Fraud
• Prescription Pill Fraud (Pill Mill)
• Sex Offenses
• Workers Compensation Fraud

In serious criminal cases against Physicians pending in Criminal Court, the Medical Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Physician. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Physician License in Criminal Court. Physicians facing criminal charges and Doctors who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Medical Board of California. These particular medical specialties are often the subject of Medical Board of California discipline and criminal charges:

• Anesthesiologist
• Cosmetic Treatments (Med-Spa)
• Dermatologist
• Gynecologist
• Pain Management
• Plastic Surgeon
• Psychiatrist
• Sports Medicine

California Doctor License Denial Statement of Issues Attorney

The Medical Board of California thoroughly investigates all Postgraduate Training License (PTL) applicants and Physician License applicants. The Medical Board of California may deny a California PTL or Physician License to students and Physicians from other states and countries. Most California Physician License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Physician License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Applicants denied a Postgraduate Training License should contact a Medical Board of California Postgraduate Training License (PTL) Denial Lawyer for representation in a Medical Board of California Statement of Issues Hearing. Individuals denied a Physician License should contact a Medical Board of California Physician License Denial Lawyer for representation in a Medical Board of California Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Physician Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Doctors who have received a Physician License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Physician License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the Medical Board of California. A successful Physician License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney.

Physician Assistant Board of California License Defense Lawyer

The Physician Assistant Board of California, known as the PAB, licenses approximately 10,000 Physician Assistants in the State of California. Most California Physician Assistants have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the Physician Assistant Board of California. For Physician Assistants who become part of the Physician Assistant Board of California’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Physician Assistant License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Physician Assistants facing the Physician Assistant Board of California disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Physician Assistant License Defense Attorney.

Physician Assistant Board of California Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Physician Assistant Board of California investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Physician Assistant Board of California Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Physician Assistant Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Physician Assistants. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the Physician Assistant Board of California disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a Physician Assistant Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

If you are a Physician Assistant facing a Physician Assistant Board of California investigation, contact a California Physician Assistant License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician Assistant License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Physician Assistant serves as notice to a Physician Assistant that the Board intends to revoke the Physician Assistant License. The Physician Assistant, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Physician Assistant. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Physician Assistant License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Physician Assistant License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Physician Assistants to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Physician Assistant Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Physician Assistants facing a Physician Assistant Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Physician Assistant License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Physician Assistants include:

Administering Drugs to Addict Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Practice of Medicine Altering Medical Records Deceptive Advertising Dishonesty Drug or Alcohol Abuse Exceeding Scope of Practice

Failure to Maintain Adequate Records Furnishing Drugs to Addict Gross Negligence Illegal Cancer Treatment Incompetence Making or Signing False Documents

Practicing Medicine Without Supervision of a Doctor/Physician Renting a Doctor/Physician License Repeated Negligent Acts Sexual Misconduct With a Patient Treating Patients While Intoxicated Unlawful Representation as a Physician Use of Title “Doctor”

California Physician Assistant License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Physician Assistant Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Physician Assistant Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Physician Assistant to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physician Assistant can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

California Physician Assistants facing a Physician Assistant Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Physician Assistant License Defense Lawyer.

California Physician Assistant License and Criminal Convictions

The Physician Assistant Board of California can discipline Physician Assistants for criminal convictions. Physician Assistant Board of California discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Physician Assistant. Common criminal offenses that can cause Physician Assistant License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The Physician Assistant Board of California and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Physician Assistants in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Physician Assistants engaged in Prescription Pill Fraud, Unlawful Practice of Medicine and Unlawful Representation as a Physician. In serious criminal cases against Physician Assistants pending in Criminal Court, the Physician Assistant Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Physician Assistant. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Physician Assistant License in Criminal Court.

Physician Assistants facing criminal charges and Physician Assistants who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Physician Assistant License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Physician Assistant Board of California.

California Physician Assistant License Statement of Issues Attorney

The Physician Assistant Board of California thoroughly investigates all applicants for Physician Assistant Licenses. The Physician Assistant Board of California may deny a California Physician Assistant License to Physician Assistant students and Physician Assistants from other states and countries. Most California Physician Assistant License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Physician Assistant License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Physician Assistant License should contact a California Physician Assistant License Denial Lawyer for representation in a Physician Assistant Board of California Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Physician Assistant Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Physician Assistants who have received a Physician Assistant License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Physician Assistant License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the Physician Assistant Board of California. A successful Physician Assistant License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Physician Assistant License Defense Attorney.

Physical Therapy Board of California License Defense Lawyer

The Physical Therapy Board of California, known as the PTB, licenses approximately 1,500 Physical Therapist Assistants in the State of California. Most California Physical Therapist Assistants have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the Physical Therapy Board of California. For Physical Therapist Assistants who become part of the Physical Therapy Board of California’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Physical Therapist Assistant License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Physical Therapist Assistants facing the Physical Therapy Board of California disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Physical Therapist Assistant License Defense Attorney.

Physical Therapy Board of California Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Physical Therapy Board of California investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Physical Therapy Board of California Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Physical Therapy Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Physical Therapist Assistants. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the Physical Therapy Board of California disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a Physical Therapy Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

If you are a Physical Therapist Assistant facing a Physical Therapy Board of California investigation, contact a California Physical Therapist Assistant License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physical Therapist Assistant License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Physical Therapist Assistant serves as notice to a Physical Therapist Assistant that the Board intends to revoke the Physical Therapist Assistant License. The Physical Therapist Assistant, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Physical Therapist Assistant. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Physical Therapist Assistant License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Physical Therapist Assistant License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Physical Therapist Assistants to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Physical Therapy Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Physical Therapist Assistants facing a Physical Therapy Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Physical Therapist Assistant License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Physical Therapist Assistants include:

Accepting or Paying Referral Fees Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Practice of Physical Therapy Altering Medical Records Exceeding Scope of Practice Excessive Prescribing or Treatment Failure to Maintain Adequate Records

Failure to Notify Board of Address Change False or Misleading Advertising Providing Nutritional Advice Gross Negligence Incompetence Making False Documents Practicing Physical Therapy Without a License

Repeated Negligent Acts Self Abuse of Drugs or Alcohol Sexual Misconduct With a Patient Subverting a Licensing Exam Unprofessional Conduct Use of Runners or Cappers Violation of Professional Confidence

California Physical Therapist Assistant License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Physical Therapy Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Physical Therapy Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Physical Therapist Assistant to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physical Therapist Assistant can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

California Physical Therapist Assistants facing a Physical Therapy Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Physical Therapist Assistant License Defense Lawyer.

California Physical Therapist Assistant License and Criminal Convictions

The Physical Therapy Board of California can discipline Physical Therapist Assistants for criminal convictions. Physical Therapy Board of California discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Physical Therapist Assistant. Common criminal offenses that can cause Physical Therapist Assistant License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The Physical Therapy Board of California and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Physical Therapist Assistants in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Physical Therapist Assistants engaged in Insurance Fraud and the Unlicensed Practice of Physical Therapy. In serious criminal cases against Physical Therapist Assistants pending in Criminal Court, the Physical Therapy Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Physical Therapist Assistant. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Physical Therapist Assistant License in Criminal Court.

Physical Therapist Assistants facing criminal charges and Physical Therapist Assistants who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Physical Therapist Assistant License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Physical Therapy Board of California.

California Physical Therapist Assistant License Statement of Issues Attorney

The Physical Therapy Board of California thoroughly investigates all applicants for Physical Therapist Assistant Licenses. The Physical Therapy Board of California may deny a California Physical Therapist Assistant License to Physical Therapist Assistant students and Physical Therapist Assistants from other states and countries. Most California Physical Therapist Assistant License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Physical Therapist Assistant License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Physical Therapist Assistant License should contact a California Physical Therapist Assistant License Denial Lawyer for representation in a Physical Therapy Board of California Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Physical Therapist Assistant Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Physical Therapist Assistants who have received a Physical Therapist Assistant License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Physical Therapist Assistant License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the Physical Therapy Board of California. A successful Physical Therapist Assistant License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Physical Therapist Assistant License Defense Attorney.