Blog

Medical Board of California Postgraduate Training License Denial Defense Lawyer

The Medical Board of California, known as the MBC, licenses approximately 120,000 Physicians in the State of California. All graduates of Medical Board of California approved medical schools who are not already licensed Physicians in another state and are accepted into an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited postgraduate training program in California must obtain a Postgraduate Training License (PTL). The PTL must be obtained within 180 days of enrollment. In other words, most Residents in Residency Programs and many Fellows in Fellowship programs must receive a PTL within 6 months of enrollment. The Postgraduate Training License is valid for 39 months. After 36 months, the Resident or Fellow must obtain a Physician and Surgeon License from the Medical Board of California. Unfortunately, many Postgraduate Training License applicants are denied a PTL. Applicants denied a PTL should seek legal representation from an experienced Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney.

Medical Board of California PTL Statement of Issues Defense Lawyer

A PTL applicant denied a Postgraduate Training License from the Medical Board of California will receive a Statement of Issues document. A Statement of Issues served on a California PTL applicant states the reasons for denial. The PTL applicant, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default Denial against the Postgraduate Training License applicant.

In many cases, it is possible for Postgraduate Training License applicants to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Medical Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). California PTL applicants facing a Medical Board of California Statement of Issues for a PTL Denial should contact an experienced Medical Board of California Statement of Issues Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes for denial of a Postgraduate Training License are:

• Academic dishonesty
• Competency issues
• Disciplinary history with another licensing agency
• Failure to disclose required information on the Postgraduate Training License (PTL) application
• Incomplete Postgraduate Training License application
• Medical degree is from an institution not recognized by the Medical Board of California
• Misstatements on the PTL application

 Medical Board of California PTL Statement of Issues Denial Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Medical Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Medical Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Doctor to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the PTL applicant can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Applicants for a Postgraduate Training License facing a Medical Board of California Administrative Law Hearing for a PTL License Denial need effective representation from a Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

Medical Board of California Postgraduate Training License Denial Attorney for Foreign/International Medical School Graduates

Foreign and international medical school graduates applying for a Postgraduate Training License issued by the Medical Board of California can face unique challenges. There are many reasons for the Medical Board of California to deny a PTL. Foreign and international medical school graduates facing a Postgraduate Training License Denial from the Medical Board of California should consult with a PTL Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer. Our law firm works with foreign and international medical school graduates denied a Postgraduate Training License (PTL) from the following locations:

• Asia
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bhutan
  • Cambodia
  • Georgia
  • India
  • Japan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Mongolia
  • Nepal
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • South Korea
  • Thailand
  • Uzbekistan
  • Vietnam
• Middle East
  • Bahrain
  • Egypt
  • Israel
  • Jordan
  • Kuwait
  • Oman
  • Qatar
  • Saudi Arabia
  • United Arab Emirates
• Africa
  • Angola
  • Botswana
  • Cameroon
  • Chad
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Ethiopia
  • Eritrea
  • Ghana
  • Guinea
  • Kenya
  • Lesotho
  • Liberia
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Morocco
  • Namibia
  • Rwanda
  • Senegal
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Togo
  • Uganda
  • Zambia
• Australia and New Zealand
• Caribbean
  • Anguilla and Barbuda
  • Antigua
  • Aruba
  • British Virgin Islands
  • Bahamas
  • Cayman Islands
  • Curacao
  • Dominica
  • Dominican Republic
  • Grenada
  • Haiti
  • Saint Lucia
  • Sint Maarten
  • Trinidad & Tobago
• Europe
  • Albania
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina
  • Bulgaria
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Denmark
  • Estonia
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Hungary
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Kosovo
  • Latvia
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Moldova
  • Monaco
  • Montenegro
  • Norway
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Romania
  • Serbia
  • Slovakia
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • The Netherlands
  • United Kingdom/Great Britain (England, Scotland, Wales)
  • Ukraine
• Latin America
  • Argentina
  • Belize
  • Bolivia
  • Brazil
  • Chile
  • Colombia
  • Costa Rica
  • Ecuador
  • Mexico
  • Panama
  • Paraguay
  • Uruguay

California State Bar Defense Lawyer in Los Angeles

The State Bar of California licenses approximately 180,000 Attorneys in the State of California. Most Los Angeles Lawyers have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California State Bar, called the Office of Chief Trial Counsel, or OCTC. For Attorneys facing California State Bar discipline, the consequences are profound. The State Bar disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Lawyers facing a Complaint, Investigation, or Notice of Disciplinary Charges (NDC) should seek legal representation from an experienced Los Angeles State Bar License Defense Attorney. Common State Bar disciplinary violations include:

• Acts of Moral Turpitude
• Breach of Fiduciary Duty
• Commingling Funds
• Communication With a Represented Party
• Conflict of Interest
• Conversion of Client Funds
• Criminal Convictions
• Failure to Communicate With the Client
• Failure to Cooperate in a Disciplinary Proceeding
• Failure to Maintain Client File
• Failure to Obey a Court Order
• Failure to Perform Legal Services
• Failure to Report Court Sanctions
• Fee Splitting With Non Lawyers
• Illegal or Unconscionable Fee
• Misappropriation
• Misleading a Court of Judge
• Reportable Actions
• Sexual Misconduct With a Client
• Trust Account Violations
• Unauthorized Practice of Law
• Violation of Disciplinary Probation
• Violation of Oath or Duties of an Attorney

State Bar of California Investigation Defense Lawyer in Los Angeles

Most California State Bar Investigations begin with a consumer Complaint. However, California State Bar Investigations also occur due to criminal convictions and referrals from law enforcement and administrative law agencies. The State Bar filters out cases that on its face have no merit. The State Bar will designate a potential Investigation as an Inquiry. Inquiries are forwarded to State Bar Investigators. The State Bar of California utilizes non sworn civilian Investigators to conduct State Bar Investigations. The State Bar of California works closely with District Attorneys’ Offices to investigate and prosecute Lawyers engaged in criminal activity. Administrative Law Due Process Rights in the State Bar disciplinary process differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law. It is important to have an attorney that understands the California State Bar lawyer disciplinary process. A State Bar of California Investigation can result in the following disciplinary options:

• The State Bar of California can close the Complaint
• The State Bar of California can issue a Warning Letter
• The State Bar of California and the Respondent can enter into an Agreement in Lieu of Discipline (ALD)
• The State Bar of California can proceed with a Notice of Disciplinary Charges (NDC)

State Bar disciplinary proceedings can result in the following types of discipline:

• Admonition
• Private Reproval
• Public Reproval
• Probation
• Suspension (actual suspension or stayed suspension)
• Disbarment

In cases involving criminal conduct, the State Bar may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Lawyer facing a California State Bar Investigation, contact a California State Bar Defense Attorney in Los Angeles for representation.

California Law License Defense Attorney in Los Angeles

Prior to the filing of a Notice of Disciplinary Charges, the State Bar will notify the Respondent of two things; One, a Notice of Intent to File Discipline Charges and two, the right to an Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, called an ENEC. An ENEC occurs before a State Bar Court Judge. The Office of Chief Trial Counsel, or OCTC, represents the State Bar of California. If a settlement does not occur, the Office of Chief Trial Counsel will file a Notice of Disciplinary Charges, or NDC.

The filing of a Notice of Disciplinary Charges requires a Respondent to file an Answer within 20 days. OCTC and the Respondent will exchange discovery. A trial in State Bar Court before a State Bar Court Judge will generally be scheduled within 125 days of the filing of the NDC. In many instances, a Settlement Conference will be scheduled. Most State Bar disciplinary matters are settled via Stipulation (or settlement). State Bar of California disciplinary matters that do not result in a settlement proceed to trial in State Bar Court. Lawyers facing a California State Bar Notice of Disciplinary Charges should contact an experienced California State Bar Discipline Defense Attorney in Los Angeles for representation. Common causes of action for State Bar discipline include:

• Bail Capping
• Billing for Services Not Performed
• Breach of Confidentiality
• Client Abandonment
• Employing the Use of Runners or Cappers
• False MCLE Compliance
• Gross Negligence in the Practice of Law
• Harm to the Administration of Justice
• Home Loan Modification Violations
• Improper Withdrawal From Representation
• Personal Injury Capping
• Unlawful Solicitation
• Willful and Intentional Acts in the Practice of Law
• Workers Compensation Capping

State Bar of California Disciplinary Hearing Defense Attorney in Los Angeles

The California State Bar Court maintains Hearing Department locations in Los Angeles and San Francisco. A State Bar Judge presides over a State Bar Court Trial. A State Bar Trial is an Administrative Law proceeding, which differs from trials in Superior Court. A State Bar Court Judge has 90 days to file a Decision. A State Bar Judge can impose a Private Reproval or Public Reproval. If a State Bar Court Judge issues a decision involving probation, a suspension or disbarment, the California Supreme Court must approve the discipline. A State Bar Court Judge’s Decision can be appealed within 30 days to the State Bar Court Review Department and later to the California Supreme Court. California Lawyers facing a California State Bar Court Trial need effective representation from a California State Bar Disciplinary Defense Lawyer in Los Angeles. The firm represents lawyers facing State Bar discipline from Los Angeles, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego and Ventura, including from:

California State Bar Discipline and Criminal Convictions

The California State Bar disciplines attorneys due to criminal convictions. Depending on the nature of the criminal conviction, discipline can range from no discipline all the way to summary disbarment. There are several categories of criminal convictions, which include:

• Felony offenses involving the specific intent to deceive, defraud, steal, or make or suborn a false statement
• Felony offenses involving moral turpitude
• Felony offenses not involving moral turpitude, but involving other misconduct warranting discipline
• Misdemeanor offenses involving moral turpitude
• Misdemeanor offenses not involving moral turpitude, but involving other misconduct warranting discipline

The State Bar of California does not conduct criminal investigations against attorneys. However, the California State Bar works closely with Los Angeles area law enforcement to investigate attorneys involved in criminal activity. Common criminal offenses that will result in a State Bar of California disciplinary proceeding include:

• Auto Insurance Fraud
• Capping
• Embezzlement
• Fraud
• Forgery
• Grand Theft
• Healthcare Fraud
• Insurance Fraud
• Medicare Fraud
• Racketeering
• Sex Offenses
• Theft
• Violent Crimes
• White Collar Crimes
• Workers Compensation Fraud

Attorneys convicted of criminal offenses that face discipline from the California State Bar and lawyers under criminal investigation need an experienced California State Bar Defense Attorney in Los Angeles for representation.

State Bar of California Moral Character Application Lawyer 

The State Bar of California thoroughly investigates all applicants for Law licenses. This is commonly known as the Moral Character Determination. The applicant bears the burden of proving good moral character to practice law. If a question of moral character arises, the applicant may be invited to attend an Informal Conference with the Subcommittee on Moral Character. If the Subcommittee on Moral Character declines to certify the applicant, the applicant can Appeal to State Bar Court. The Hearing Department of the State Bar Court will then conduct a trial. State Bar Court Trials and Appeals for Moral Character Determinations are conducted in the same manner as for licensed attorneys. Common reasons for applicants to be denied Admission to the Bar include:

• Academic Dishonesty / Plagiarism
• Administrative Proceeding Discipline
• Dishonesty, Fraud or Deceit
• Lack of Candor
• Felony criminal convictions
• Financial irresponsibility
• Misdemeanor criminal convictions
• Misrepresentation on Application
• Past Due Child Support

Dental Board of California Dentist Healthcare Fraud Defense Attorney

The Dental Board of California, known as the MBC, vigorously investigates and disciplines Dentists accused of participating in Healthcare Fraud. California law enforcement agencies heavily prosecute Dentists engaging in Healthcare Fraud. There are several common methods by which Dentists participate in Healthcare Fraud schemes. Dentists often establish clinics known as Claim Mills, or Medical Mills. Dentists at these Claim Mills and Medical Mills often commit the following violations:

• Billing Healthcare for services not rendered
• Excessive Treatments
• False Medical Claims
• Gross Negligence in the Practice of Dentistry
• Overbilling Healthcare for services rendered
• Kickbacks to insurers, medical suppliers, and healthcare providers
• Prescribing unnecessary pain management narcotics medication (Pill Mill)

Healthcare Fraud aided and abetted by Dentists remains a top enforcement priority for the Dental Board of California and other law enforcement agencies. False and fraudulent billing for services allegedly rendered, as well as kickback schemes, are an investigative priority for law enforcement. The Dental Board of California also targets Dentists at Claim Mills and Medical Mills who prescribe unnecessary painkiller narcotics medications. Put another way, the Dental Board of California targets Dentists running Pill Mills that double as Healthcare Claim Mills and Healthcare Medical Mills.

Consequences of Healthcare Fraud for Dentists can include Dental License revocation by the Dental Board of California, loss of hospital privileges and even criminal charges. California Dentists facing allegations related to Healthcare Fraud should contact an experienced Dental Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Dental Board of California Healthcare Fraud Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Dental Board of California Healthcare Fraud Investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Dental Board of California Healthcare Fraud Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Dental Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal Healthcare Fraud Investigations against Dentists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to Healthcare Fraud committed by Dentists. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Dentists facing disciplinary action for Healthcare Fraud. At the conclusion of a Dental Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. The Board may also refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Dental facing a Dental Board of California Investigation for Healthcare Fraud, contact a California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Dental License Healthcare Fraud Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Dental serves as notice to a Dental that the Dental Board of California intends to revoke the Dental License. A substantiated allegation of Healthcare Fraud by a Dentist almost always results in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Dental License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Dentists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Dental Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Disciplinary Accusations involving Healthcare Fraud can result in revocation of a Dental and Surgeon License by the Dental Board of California. Dentists facing a Dental Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Dental License Hearing For Healthcare Fraud

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Dental Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Dental Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Dentist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Dental can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Dentists facing a Dental Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Dental Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Dentist Healthcare Fraud Criminal Charges and Dental Board of California Discipline

The Dental Board of California can discipline Dentists for Healthcare Fraud that rises to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The Dental Board of California disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The Dental Board of California can discipline Dentists for certain criminal convictions. Dental Board of California Dental discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Dental. All Healthcare Fraud crimes are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Dentist.

The Dental Board of California and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Dentists for Healthcare Fraud. In serious criminal cases against Dentists pending in Criminal Court, the Dental Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Dental. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Dental License in Criminal Court. Dentists facing criminal charges and Dentists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Dental Board of California.

California State Bar Defense Lawyer

The State Bar of California licenses approximately 180,000 Attorneys in the State of California. Most California Lawyers have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California State Bar, called the Office of Chief Trial Counsel, or OCTC. For Attorneys facing California State Bar discipline, the consequences are profound. The State Bar disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Lawyers facing a Complaint, Investigation, or Notice of Disciplinary Charges (NDC) should seek legal representation from an experienced California State Bar License Defense Attorney. Common State Bar disciplinary violations include:

• Acts of Moral Turpitude
• Breach of Fiduciary Duty
• Commingling Funds
• Communication With a Represented Party
• Conflict of Interest
• Conversion of Client Funds
• Criminal Convictions
• Failure to Communicate With the Client
• Failure to Cooperate in a Disciplinary Proceeding
• Failure to Maintain Client File
• Failure to Obey a Court Order
• Failure to Perform Legal Services
• Failure to Report Court Sanctions
• Fee Splitting With Non Lawyers
• Illegal or Unconscionable Fee
• Misappropriation
• Misleading a Court of Judge
• Reportable Actions
• Sexual Misconduct With a Client
• Trust Account Violations
• Unauthorized Practice of Law
• Violation of Disciplinary Probation
• Violation of Oath or Duties of an Attorney

State Bar of California Investigation Defense Lawyer

Most California State Bar Investigations begin with a consumer Complaint. However, California State Bar Investigations also occur due to criminal convictions and referrals from law enforcement and administrative law agencies. The State Bar filters out cases that on its face have no merit. The State Bar will designate a potential Investigation as an Inquiry. Inquiries are forwarded to State Bar Investigators. The State Bar of California utilizes non sworn civilian Investigators to conduct State Bar Investigations. The State Bar of California works closely with District Attorneys’ Offices to investigate and prosecute Lawyers engaged in criminal activity. Administrative Law Due Process Rights in the State Bar disciplinary process differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law. It is important to have an attorney that understands the California State Bar lawyer disciplinary process. A State Bar of California Investigation can result in the following disciplinary options:

• The State Bar of California can close the Complaint
• The State Bar of California can issue a Warning Letter
• The State Bar of California and the Respondent can enter into an Agreement in Lieu of Discipline (ALD)
• The State Bar of California can proceed with a Notice of Disciplinary Charges (NDC)

State Bar disciplinary proceedings can result in the following types of discipline:

• Admonition
• Private Reproval
• Public Reproval
• Probation
• Suspension (actual suspension or stayed suspension)
• Disbarment

In cases involving criminal conduct, the State Bar may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Lawyer facing a California State Bar Investigation, contact a California State Bar Defense Attorney for representation.

California Law License Defense Attorney

Prior to the filing of a Notice of Disciplinary Charges, the State Bar will notify the Respondent of two things; One, a Notice of Intent to File Discipline Charges and two, the right to an Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, called an ENEC. An ENEC occurs before a State Bar Court Judge. The Office of Chief Trial Counsel, or OCTC, represents the State Bar of California. If a settlement does not occur, the Office of Chief Trial Counsel will file a Notice of Disciplinary Charges, or NDC.

The filing of a Notice of Disciplinary Charges requires a Respondent to file an Answer within 20 days. OCTC and the Respondent will exchange discovery. A trial in State Bar Court before a State Bar Court Judge will generally be scheduled within 125 days of the filing of the NDC. In many instances, a Settlement Conference will be scheduled. Most State Bar disciplinary matters are settled via Stipulation (or settlement). State Bar of California disciplinary matters that do not result in a settlement proceed to trial in State Bar Court. Lawyers facing a California State Bar Notice of Disciplinary Charges should contact an experienced California State Bar Discipline Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for State Bar discipline include:

• Bail Capping
• Billing for Services Not Performed
• Breach of Confidentiality
• Client Abandonment
• Employing the Use of Runners or Cappers
• False MCLE Compliance
• Gross Negligence in the Practice of Law
• Harm to the Administration of Justice
• Home Loan Modification Violations
• Improper Withdrawal From Representation
• Personal Injury Capping
• Unlawful Solicitation
• Willful and Intentional Acts in the Practice of Law
• Workers Compensation Capping

State Bar of California Disciplinary Hearing Defense Attorney

The California State Bar Court maintains Hearing Department locations in Los Angeles and San Francisco. A State Bar Judge presides over a State Bar Court Trial. A State Bar Trial is an Administrative Law proceeding, which differs from trials in Superior Court. A State Bar Court Judge has 90 days to file a Decision. A State Bar Judge can impose a Private Reproval or Public Reproval. If a State Bar Court Judge issues a decision involving probation, a suspension or disbarment, the California Supreme Court must approve the discipline. A State Bar Court Judge’s Decision can be appealed within 30 days to the State Bar Court Review Department and later to the California Supreme Court. California Lawyers facing a California State Bar Court Trial need effective representation from a California State Bar Disciplinary Defense Lawyer. The firm represents lawyers facing State Bar  discipline from throughout California, including from:

• Bakersfield
• Fresno
• Los Angeles
• Oakland
• Orange County
• Riverside
• Sacramento
• San Bernardino
• San Diego
• San Francisco
• San Jose
• Ventura County

California State Bar Discipline and Criminal Convictions

The California State Bar disciplines attorneys due to criminal convictions. Depending on the nature of the criminal conviction, discipline can range from no discipline all the way to summary disbarment. There are several categories of criminal convictions, which include:

• Felony offenses involving the specific intent to deceive, defraud, steal, or make or suborn a false statement
• Felony offenses involving moral turpitude
• Felony offenses not involving moral turpitude, but involving other misconduct warranting discipline
• Misdemeanor offenses involving moral turpitude
• Misdemeanor offenses not involving moral turpitude, but involving other misconduct warranting discipline

The State Bar of California does not conduct criminal investigations against attorneys. However, the State Bar of California works closely with law enforcement to investigate attorneys involved in criminal activity. Common criminal offenses that will result in a State Bar of California disciplinary proceeding include:

• Auto Insurance Fraud
• Capping
• Embezzlement
• Fraud
• Forgery
• Grand Theft
• Healthcare Fraud
• Insurance Fraud
• Medicare Fraud
• Racketeering
• Sex Offenses
• Theft
• Violent Crimes
• White Collar Crimes
• Workers Compensation Fraud

Attorneys convicted of criminal offenses that face discipline from the California State Bar and lawyers under criminal investigation need an experienced California State Bar Defense Attorney for representation.

State Bar of California Moral Character Application Lawyer 

The State Bar of California thoroughly investigates all applicants for Law licenses. This is commonly known as the Moral Character Determination. The applicant bears the burden of proving good moral character to practice law. If a question of moral character arises, the applicant may be invited to attend an Informal Conference with the Subcommittee on Moral Character. If the Subcommittee on Moral Character declines to certify the applicant, the applicant can Appeal to State Bar Court. The Hearing Department of the State Bar Court will then conduct a trial. State Bar Court Trials and Appeals for Moral Character Determinations are conducted in the same manner as for licensed attorneys. Common reasons for applicants to be denied Admission to the Bar include:

• Academic Dishonesty / Plagiarism
• Administrative Proceeding Discipline
• Dishonesty, Fraud or Deceit
• Lack of Candor
• Felony criminal convictions
• Financial irresponsibility
• Misdemeanor criminal convictions
• Misrepresentation on Application
• Past Due Child Support

Medical Board of California Doctor Healthcare Fraud Defense Attorney

The Medical Board of California, known as the MBC, vigorously investigates and disciplines Physicians accused of participating in Healthcare Fraud. California law enforcement agencies heavily prosecute Doctors engaging in Healthcare Fraud. There are several common methods by which Physicians participate in Healthcare Fraud schemes. Physicians often establish clinics known as Claim Mills, or Medical Mills. Doctors at these Claim Mills and Medical Mills often commit the following violations:

• Billing Healthcare for services not rendered
• Excessive Treatments
• False Medical Claims
• Gross Negligence in the Practice of Medicine
• Overbilling Healthcare for services rendered
• Kickbacks to insurers, medical suppliers, and healthcare providers
• Prescribing unnecessary pain management narcotics medication (Pill Mill)

Healthcare Fraud aided and abetted by Doctors remains a top enforcement priority for the Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies. False and fraudulent billing for services allegedly rendered, as well as kickback schemes, are an investigative priority for law enforcement. The Medical Board of California also targets Physicians at Claim Mills and Medical Mills who prescribe unnecessary painkiller narcotics medications. Put another way, the Medical Board of California targets Physicians running Pill Mills that double as Healthcare Claim Mills and Healthcare Medical Mills.

Consequences of Healthcare Fraud for Doctors can include Physician and Surgeon License revocation by the Medical Board of California, loss of hospital privileges and even criminal charges. California Physicians facing allegations related to Healthcare Fraud should contact an experienced Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Medical Board of California Healthcare Fraud Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Medical Board of California Healthcare Fraud Investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Medical Board of California Healthcare Fraud Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Medical Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal Healthcare Fraud Investigations against Doctors. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to Healthcare Fraud committed by Physicians. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Physicians facing disciplinary action for Healthcare Fraud. At the conclusion of a Medical Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. The Board may also refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Physician facing a Medical Board of California Investigation for Healthcare Fraud, contact a California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Healthcare Fraud Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Physician serves as notice to a Physician that the Medical Board of California intends to revoke the Physician License. A substantiated allegation of Healthcare Fraud by a Doctor almost always results in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Physician License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Doctors to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Medical Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Disciplinary Accusations involving Healthcare Fraud can result in revocation of a Physician and Surgeon License by the Medical Board of California. Doctors facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Hearing For Healthcare Fraud

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Medical Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Medical Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Doctor to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physician can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Physicians facing a Medical Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Physician Healthcare Fraud Criminal Charges and Medical Board of California Discipline

The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for Healthcare Fraud that rises to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The Medical Board of California disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for certain criminal convictions. Medical Board of California Physician discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Physician. All Healthcare Fraud crimes are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Doctor.

The Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Physicians for Healthcare Fraud. In serious criminal cases against Doctors pending in Criminal Court, the Medical Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Physician. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Physician License in Criminal Court. Doctors facing criminal charges and Physicians who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Medical Board of California.

Dental Board of California Dentist Diversion of Controlled Substances Defense Attorney

The Dental Board of California, known as the DBC, vigorously investigates and disciplines Dentists accused of Diversion of Narcotics.  An allegation of Diverting Narcotics against Dentists in California can have profound consequences. Consequences can include Dentist License revocation by the Dental Board of California. The following types of Narcotics are often diverted by Dentists:

Adderall Ambien Codeine Demerol Dilaudid

Fentanyl Hydrocodone Lortab Methadone Morphine

Norco Oxycodone OxyContin Suboxone Vicodin

Thus, even Diversion of Narcotics incidents that do not result in criminal prosecution are grounds for disciplinary action against the Dentist by the Dental Board of California. California Dentists facing Narcotics Diversion allegations should contact an experienced Dental Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Dental Board of California Diversion of Narcotics Conviction Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Dental Board of California Diverting Narcotics Investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Dental Board of California Diversion of Narcotics Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Dental Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal Diversion of Narcotics Investigations against Dentists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to alcohol abuse and drug abuse committed by Dentists against patients. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Dentists facing disciplinary action for Diverting Narcotics. At the conclusion of a Dental Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In substance abuse cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Dentist facing a Dental Board of California Investigation for Diversion of Narcotics Investigations, contact a California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation.

When a Dental Board of California Investigation occurs due to a criminal conviction, the Dental Board of California assigns the matter to an Investigator. A Dental Board of California Investigator will contact the Dentist to conduct either an in person interview, or obtain a written statement. The Dental Board of California will also conduct a review of the police and Court records. Discipline may vary according to whether or not the following factors were present (not an all inclusive list):

• Alcohol Abuse
• CURES Violations
• Drug Abuse
• Excessive Treatments
• Forging Prescriptions
• Operation of a Pill Mill
• Overprescribing to Patients
• Past history of Diversion of Narcotics
• Patient Harm
• Substance Abuse
• Use of Fraudulent Prescriptions
• Working Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs/Narcotics

If you are a Dentist facing a Dental Board of California Investigation for Diversion of Controlled Substances, contact a California Dentist License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Dental License Diverting Narcotics Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Dentist serves as notice to a Dentist that the Dental Board of California intends to revoke the Dental License. A substantiated allegation of Diverting Narcotics by a Dentist almost always results in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Dental License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Dentists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Dental Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Disciplinary Accusations involving Diversion of Narcotics can result in revocation of a Dental License by the Dental Board of California. Dentists facing a Dental Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Dental License Hearing For Diversion of Narcotics

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Dental Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Dental Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Dentist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Dentist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Dentists facing a Dental Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Dental Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Dentist Narcotics Diversion and Dental Board of California Discipline

The Dental Board of California can discipline Dentists for Diversion of Narcotics allegations that rise to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The Dental Board of California disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The Dental Board of California can discipline Dentists for certain criminal convictions. Dental Board of California Dentist discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Dentist. All Diverting Narcotics crimes patients are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Dentist.

The Dental Board of California and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Dentists for Diverting Narcotics. In serious criminal cases against Dentists pending in Criminal Court, the Dental Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Dentist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Dental License in Criminal Court. Dentists facing criminal charges and Dentists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Dental Board of California.

Dental Board of California Dentist Sexual Misconduct Defense Attorney

The Dental Board of California, known as the DBC, vigorously investigates and disciplines Dentists accused of Sexual Misconduct. An allegation of Sexual Misconduct or Sexual Abuse against Dentists in California can have profound consequences. Consequences can include Dental License revocation by the Dental Board of California and even criminal charges. The California Business & Professions Code Section prohibits Sexual Misconduct. Sexual Misconduct is broadly defined. Sexual Misconduct includes, but is not limited to, the following acts:

• Indecent Exposure
• Lewd Acts With a Child
• Lewd Conduct
• Oral Copulation
• Penetration by a Foreign Object
• Rape
• Sexual Abuse
• Sexual Assault
• Sexual Battery
• Sexual Relations with a Patient, Client or Customer
• Sodomy
• Solicitation of Prostitution

Thus, even consensual sexual relations between a Dentist and a patient in California is grounds for disciplinary action against the Dentist by the Dental Board of California. California Business & Professions Code Section 729 further prohibits Sexual Exploitation by a Dentist in California. California Dentists facing Sexual Abuse or Sexual Misconduct allegations should contact an experienced Dental Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Dental Board of California Sexual Misconduct Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Dental Board of California Sexual Misconduct Investigations begin with the filing of a criminal conviction. However, Dental Board of California Sexual Misconduct Investigations also occur through sting operations, consumer complaints and criminal investigations. The Dental Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal sexual misconduct investigations against Dentists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to Sexual Abuse or Sexual Misconduct committed by Dentists. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Dentists facing disciplinary action for Sexual Misconduct violations related to Sexual Abuse and Sexual Misconduct. At the conclusion of a Dental Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In Sexual Misconduct cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Dentist facing a Dental Board of California Investigation for a Sexual Misconduct violation against a patient, contact a California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Dental License Sexual Assault Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Dentist serves as notice to a Dentist that the Dental Board of California intends to revoke the Dental License. A substantiated allegation of Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by a Dentist almost always results in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Dental License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Dentists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Dental Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Disciplinary Accusations involving Sexual Misconduct can result in revocation of a Dental License by the Dental Board of California. Dentists facing a Dental Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Dental License Hearing For Sexual Misconduct

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Dental Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Dental Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Dentist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Dentist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Dentists facing a Dental Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Dental Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Dentist Sexual Assault Criminal Charges and Dental Board of California Discipline

The Dental Board of California can discipline Dentists for Sexual Misconduct that rises to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The Dental Board of California disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The Dental Board of California can discipline Dentists for certain criminal convictions. Dental Board of California Dentist discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Dentist. All Sexual Misconduct crimes are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Dentist.

The Dental Board of California and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Dentists for Sexual Assault or Sexual Battery. In serious criminal cases against Dentists pending in Criminal Court, the Dental Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Dentist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Dental License in Criminal Court. Dentists facing criminal charges and Dentists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Dental Board of California.

Dental Board of California Dentist Workers Compensation Fraud Defense Attorney

The Dental Board of California, known as the DBC, vigorously investigates and disciplines Dentists accused of participating in Workers Compensation Fraud. California law enforcement agencies heavily prosecute Dentists engaging in Workers Compensation Fraud. There are several common methods by which Dentists participate in Workers Compensation Fraud schemes. Dentists often establish clinics known as Claim Mills, or Dental Mills. Dentists at these Claim Mills and Dental Mills often commit the following violations:

• Billing Workers Compensation for services not rendered
• Excessive Treatments
• False Dental Claims
• Gross Negligence in the Practice of Medicine
• Overbilling Workers Compensation for services rendered
• Kickbacks to insurers, Dental suppliers, and Pharmacists
• Prescribing unnecessary pain management narcotics medication (Pill Mill)

Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud aided and abetted by Dentists remains a top enforcement priority for the Dental Board of California and other law enforcement agencies. False and fraudulent billing for services allegedly rendered, as well as kickback schemes, are an investigative priority for law enforcement. The Dental Board of California also targets Dentists at Claim Mills and Dental Mills who prescribe unnecessary painkiller narcotics medications. Put another way, the Dental Board of California targets Dentists running Pill Mills that double as Workers Compensation Claim Mills and Workers Compensation Dental Mills.

Consequences of Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud for Dentists can include Dental License revocation by the Dental Board of California and even criminal charges. California Dentists facing allegations related to Workers Compensation Fraud should contact an experienced Dental Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Dental Board of California Workers Compensation Fraud Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Dental Board of California Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud Investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Dental Board of California Workers Compensation Fraud Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Dental Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal Workers Compensation Fraud Investigations against Dentists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to Workers Compensation Fraud committed by Dentists. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Dentists facing disciplinary action for Workers Compensation Fraud. At the conclusion of a Dental Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. The Board may also refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Dentist facing a Dental Board of California Investigation for Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud, contact a California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Dental License Workers Compensation Fraud Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Dentist serves as notice to a Dentist that the Dental Board of California intends to revoke the Dental License. A substantiated allegation of Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud by a Dentist almost always results in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Dental License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Dentists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Dental Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Disciplinary Accusations involving Workers Compensation Fraud can result in revocation of a Dental License by the Dental Board of California. Dentists facing a Dental Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Dental License Hearing For Workers Compensation Fraud

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Dental Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Dental Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Dentist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Dentist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Dentists facing a Dental Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Dental Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Dentist Workers Compensation Fraud Criminal Charges and Dental Board of California Discipline

The Dental Board of California can discipline Dentists for Workers Compensation Fraud that rises to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The Dental Board of California disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The Dental Board of California can discipline Dentists for certain criminal convictions. Dental Board of California Dentist discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Dentist. All Workers Compensation Fraud crimes are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Dentist.

The Dental Board of California and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Dentists for Workers Compensation Fraud. In serious criminal cases against Dentists pending in Criminal Court, the Dental Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Dentist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Dental License in Criminal Court. Dentists facing criminal charges and Dentists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Dental Board of California.

Dental Board of California Dentist Overprescribing Prescription Pills Defense Attorney

The Dental Board of California, known as the DBC, vigorously investigates and disciplines Dentists accused of Overprescribing Prescription Narcotics. Allegations of Overprescribing Prescription Drugs and Prescription Pill Fraud against Dentists in California can have profound consequences. Consequences can include Dental License revocation by the Dental Board of California and even criminal charges. California Business & Professions Code Sections 2238, 2239 and 2280 include the prohibition of the following acts involving Prescription Narcotics and Prescription Pills:

• Diverting Controlled Substances or Prescription Narcotic Pills
• Excessive Use of Controlled Substances
• Illegal Sales of Controlled Substances
• Practice Under the Influence of Narcotics
• Violation of Drug Statutes

Prescription Narcotics include, but are not limited to, the following:

Adderall Ambien Codeine Demerol Dilaudid

Fentanyl Hydrocodone Lortab Methadone Morphine

Norco Oxycodone OxyContin Suboxone Vicodin

Thus, even prescription pill and prescription narcotic related violations that do not result in criminal prosecution are grounds for disciplinary action against the Dentist by the Dental Board of California. California Dentists facing Pill Mill and drug violation allegations should contact an experienced Dental Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Dental Board of California Overprescribing Narcotics Criminal Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Dental Board of California Pill Mill Investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Dental Board of California Overprescribing Prescription Narcotics Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Dental Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal Pill Mill Investigations against Dentists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to Overprescribing Prescription Narcotics and Prescription Pill Fraud committed by Dentists against patients. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Dentists facing disciplinary action for Overprescribing Medication. At the conclusion of a Dental Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In Overprescribing Narcotics cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Dentist facing a Dental Board of California Investigation for Overprescribing Prescription Narcotics, contact a California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Dental License Overprescribing Medication Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Dentist serves as notice to a Dentist that the Dental Board of California intends to revoke the Dental License. A criminal conviction for the following Prescription Narcotic criminal charges against a Dentist will result in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation:

• Altering a Prescription
• Diversion of Controlled Substances or Prescription Narcotic Pills
• Driving Under the Influence of Narcotics (DUI Narcotics)
• Forgery of a Prescription
• Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance
• Possession for Sale of Prescription Narcotic Pills
• Substance Abuse Fraud
• Public Intoxication Under the Influence of Narcotics
• Trafficking Substance Abuses

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Dental License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Dentists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Dental Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Disciplinary Accusations involving Overprescribing Prescription Drugs can result in revocation of a Dental License by the Dental Board of California. Dentists facing a Dental Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Dental License Hearing For Overprescribing Prescription Narcotic Medication

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Dental Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Dental Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Dentist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Dentist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Dentists facing a Dental Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Dental Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Dentist Prescription Pill Mill Defense Attorney

The Dental Board of California can discipline Dentists for operation of a Pill Mill that rises to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The Dental Board of California disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The Dental Board of California can discipline Dentists for certain criminal convictions. Dental Board of California Dentist discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Dentist. All crimes involving Pill Mills are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Dentist.

The Dental Board of California and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Dentists for Overprescribing Prescription Drugs and Operation Pill Mills. In serious criminal cases against Dentists pending in Criminal Court, the Dental Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Dentist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Dental License in Criminal Court. Dentists facing criminal charges and Dentists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Dental Board of California.

Dental Board of California Dentist Medi-Cal Fraud Defense Attorney

The Dental Board of California, known as the DBC, vigorously investigates and disciplines Dentists accused of participating in Medi-Cal Fraud. California law enforcement agencies heavily prosecute Dentists engaging in Medi-Cal Fraud. There are several common methods by which Dentists participate in Medi-Cal Fraud schemes. Dentists often establish clinics known as Claim Mills, or Dental Mills. Dentists at these Claim Mills and Dental Mills often commit the following violations:

• Billing Medi-Cal for services not rendered
• Excessive Treatments
• False Dental Claims
• Gross Negligence in the Practice of Medicine
• Overbilling Medi-Cal for services rendered
• Kickbacks to insurers, Dental suppliers, and Pharmacists
• Prescribing unnecessary pain management narcotics medication (Pill Mill)

Medi-Cal Insurance Fraud aided and abetted by Dentists remains a top enforcement priority for the Dental Board of California and other law enforcement agencies. False and fraudulent billing for services allegedly rendered, as well as kickback schemes, are an investigative priority for law enforcement. The Dental Board of California also targets Dentists at Claim Mills and Dental Mills who prescribe unnecessary painkiller narcotics medications. Put another way, the Dental Board of California targets Dentists running Pill Mills that double as Medi-Cal Claim Mills and Medi-Cal Dental Mills.

Consequences of Medi-Cal Insurance Fraud for Dentists can include Dental License revocation by the Dental Board of California and even criminal charges. California Dentists facing allegations related to Medi-Cal Fraud should contact an experienced Dental Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Dental Board of California Medi-Cal Fraud Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Dental Board of California Medi-Cal Insurance Fraud Investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Dental Board of California Medi-Cal Fraud Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Dental Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal Medi-Cal Fraud Investigations against Dentists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to Medi-Cal Fraud committed by Dentists. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Dentists facing disciplinary action for Medi-Cal Fraud. At the conclusion of a Dental Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. The Board may also refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Dentist facing a Dental Board of California Investigation for Medi-Cal Insurance Fraud, contact a California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Dental License Medi-Cal Fraud Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Dentist serves as notice to a Dentist that the Dental Board of California intends to revoke the Dental License. A substantiated allegation of Medi-Cal Insurance Fraud by a Dentist almost always results in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Dental License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Dentists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Dental Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Disciplinary Accusations involving Medi-Cal Fraud can result in revocation of a Dental License by the Dental Board of California. Dentists facing a Dental Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Dental License Hearing For Medi-Cal Fraud

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Dental Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Dental Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Dentist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Dentist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Dentists facing a Dental Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Dental Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Dentist Medi-Cal Fraud Criminal Charges and Dental Board of California Discipline

The Dental Board of California can discipline Dentists for Medi-Cal Fraud that rises to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The Dental Board of California disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The Dental Board of California can discipline Dentists for certain criminal convictions. Dental Board of California Dentist discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Dentist. All Medi-Cal Fraud crimes are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Dentist.

The Dental Board of California and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Dentists for Medi-Cal Fraud. In serious criminal cases against Dentists pending in Criminal Court, the Dental Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Dentist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Dental License in Criminal Court. Dentists facing criminal charges and Dentists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Dental License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Dental Board of California.