Blog

California Professional License Defense Lawyer

Over one million individuals possess Professional licenses issued by California licensing Boards. Most California Professional providers have minimal or no contact with the disciplinary systems of the numerous California Professional Licensing Boards. For California Professional licensees who become part of the California Administrative Law disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The California Administrative Law disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Individuals facing Professional License discipline should seek legal representation from an experienced California Professional License Defense Attorney. Our firm represents licensees possessing the following California Professional licenses:

• Alarm Company Employee
• Architect
• Attorney
• Barber
• Baton Training Instructor
• Cemetery Manager
• Cemetery Salesperson
• Certified Rangeland Manager
• Contractor
• Cosmetologist
• Crematory Manager
• Court Reporter
• Electrologist
• Engineer
• Esthetician
• Embalmer
• Firearms Training Instructor
• Funeral Director
• Geologist
• Home Improvement Salesperson
• Land Surveyor
• Landscape Architect
• Lawyer
• Locksmith
• Manicurist
• Private Investigator
• Registered Professional Forester
• Security Guard
• Structural Pest Control Operator
• Teacher

California Professional License Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Professional License disciplinary investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, disciplinary Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The licensing boards under the California Department of Consumer Affairs utilize non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs also employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Professional licensees. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Professional License disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Professional Licensing Board investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a California Professional licensee facing a California Administrative Law investigation, contact a California Professional License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Professional License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Professional Licensee serves as notice to a Professional licensee that the Board intends to revoke the individual’s Professional License. The licensee, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the California Professional licensee. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the California Professional License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Professional License in California. In many cases, it is possible for licensees to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Licensing Board. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Licensees facing a California Licensing Board Accusation should contact an experienced California Professional License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Professional License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. An Administrative Law Judge presides over the Hearing and hears the evidence. Hearings are now held via Zoom. Previously, Hearings were held in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. Previously, Hearings were also held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California licensing agency can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Boards’ action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Professional licensee to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the licensee can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Professional licensees facing a California Professional Licensing Board Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Professional License Defense Lawyer.

California Professional License and Criminal Convictions

California Professional Licensing Boards can discipline licensees for criminal convictions. Administrative Law discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of the respective Professional licensee. Common criminal offenses that can cause California Professional License discipline are:

• Child Abuse/Child Endangerment/Elder Abuse
• Diverting a Controlled Substance/Theft
• Domestic Violence
• Drugs/Narcotics
• DUI
• Insurance Fraud/Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud
• Sex Offenses
• Violent Crimes
• Weapons Offenses

California Professional Licensing Boards and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by licensees in the course and scope of their practice. In serious criminal cases against Professional licensees pending in Criminal Court, a California Professional Licensing Board and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Professional Licensee. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Professional License in Criminal Court. California Professional Licensee facing criminal charges and licensees who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Professional License Defense Attorney for representation in California Administrative Law disciplinary proceedings.

California Professional License Statement of Issues Attorney

California licensing agencies thoroughly investigates all applicants for Professional Licenses. The licensing Board may deny a California Professional License to students and licensees from other states and countries. Most California Professional License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Professional License should contact a California Professional License Denial Lawyer for representation in a Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Professional License Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows individuals who have received a License Revocation to reinstate their Professional License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Professional License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement. A successful Professional License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Professional License Defense Attorney.

California Business License Defense Lawyer

Nearly one million businesses maintain licenses issued by California licensing Boards. Most California Business licensees have minimal or no contact with the disciplinary systems of the numerous California Business Licensing Boards. For California Business licensees who become part of the California Administrative Law disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The California Administrative Law disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Individuals facing Business License discipline should seek legal representation from an experienced California Business License Defense Attorney. Our firm represents licensees possessing the following California Business licenses:

• Adult Day Program
• Adult Residential Facility
• Alarm Company Operator
• Assisted Living Facility
• Automotive Repair Dealer
• Barbershop
• Baton Training Facility
• Brake Adjusting Station
• Cemetery
• Crematory
• Child Group Home
• Day Care
• Driving School
• Home
• Funeral Establishment
• Firearms Training Facility
• Foster Family Home
• Home Care Organization
• Hospital
• Liquor License
• Lamp Adjusting Station
• Moving Company
• Nursing Home
• Passenger Carrier
• Preschool
• Private Patrol Operator
• Private Postsecondary Education School
• Proprietary Private Security Employer
• Skilled Nursing Facility
• Social Rehabilitation Facility
• Solid Waste Facility
• Smog Check Station
• Substance Abuse Treatment Center
• Traffic Violator School
• Vehicle Dealer
• Waste Tire Facility

California Business License Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Business License disciplinary investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, disciplinary Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The licensing boards under the California Department of Consumer Affairs utilize non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs also employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Business licensees. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Business License disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Business Licensing Board investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a California Business licensee facing a California Administrative Law investigation, contact a California Business License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Business License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Business Licensee serves as notice to a Business licensee that the Board intends to revoke the individual’s Business License. The licensee, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the California Business licensee. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the California Business License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Business License in California. In many cases, it is possible for licensees to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Licensing Board. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Licensees facing a California Licensing Board Accusation should contact an experienced California Business License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Business License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. An Administrative Law Judge presides over the Hearing and hears the evidence. Hearings are now held via Zoom. Previously, Hearings were held in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. Previously, Hearings were also held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California licensing agency can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Boards’ action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Business licensee to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the licensee can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Business licensees facing a California Business Licensing Board Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Business License Defense Lawyer.

California Business License and Criminal Convictions

California Business Licensing Boards can discipline licensee owners, officers and managers for criminal convictions. Administrative Law discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of the respective Business licensee. Common criminal offenses that can cause California Business License discipline are:

• Child Abuse/Child Endangerment/Elder Abuse
• Diverting a Controlled Substance/Theft
• Domestic Violence
• Drugs/Narcotics
• DUI
• Insurance Fraud/Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud
• Sex Offenses
• Violent Crimes
• Weapons Offenses

California Business Licensing Boards and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by licensees in the course and scope of their business. In serious criminal cases against Business licensees pending in Criminal Court, a California Business Licensing Board and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Business Licensee. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Business License in Criminal Court. California Business Licensee facing criminal charges and licensees who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Business License Defense Attorney for representation in California Administrative Law disciplinary proceedings.

California Business License Statement of Issues Attorney

California licensing agencies thoroughly investigates all applicants for Business Licenses. The licensing Board may deny a California Business License to students and licensees from other states and countries. Most California Business License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Business License should contact a California Business License Denial Lawyer for representation in a Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Business License Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows individuals who have received a License Revocation to reinstate their Business License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Business License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement. A successful Business License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Business License Defense Attorney.

Medical Board of California Accusation Case Results

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Accusation Against Physician: A Los Angeles Physician, practicing as a Dermatologist, faced a Medical Board of California Accusation. The Doctor was accused of Gross Negligence in the Practice of Medicine, Repeated Acts of Negligence and the Failure to Maintain Adequate Records. A settlement proposal submitted to the Medical Board of California provided a convincing argument that the allegations lacked substantiating evidence. The Medical Board of California entered into a Stipulated Agreement (settlement) with the Physician. The client received a Public Letter of Reprimand, known as a PLR.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Accusation Against Physician: A Los Angeles Physician, practicing as an ENT (Ear, Nose & Throat) Physician, faced a Medical Board of California Accusation. The Doctor was accused of Gross Negligence in the Practice of Medicine, Repeated Acts of Negligence and the Failure to Maintain Adequate Records. A settlement proposal submitted to the Medical Board of California provided a convincing argument that the allegations lacked substantiating evidence. The Medical Board of California entered into a Stipulated Agreement (settlement) with the Physician. The client received a Public Letter of Reprimand, known as a PLR.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Accusation Against Physician: A Los Angeles Physician, practicing in Internal Medicine, was previously disciplined by the Medical Board of California and placed on probation for substance abuse. During probation, the Doctor tested positive for alcohol on several occasions and was arrested for Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol. The Medical Board of California instituted a Cease Practice Order, rendering the Physician unable to work. The Medical Board of California then filed a Petition to Revoke Probation. A settlement proposal submitted to the Medical Board of California provided a convincing argument that the positive alcohol tests results were questionable. In addition, the settlement proposal highlighted the client’s substantial mitigation. The Medical Board of California entered into a Stipulated Agreement (settlement) with the Doctor. The client was placed back on disciplinary probation.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Accusation Against Physician: A Los Angeles Physician, practicing as an Emergency Room Doctor, was convicted of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol on two separate occasions. One of the incidents involved a Hit & Run. The Medical Board of California filed a disciplinary Accusation against the Physician. The Medical Board of California entered into a Stipulated Agreement (settlement) with the Doctor. The Stipulated Agreement with the Medical Board of California avoided a period of suspension.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Accusation Against Physician: A Los Angeles Physician, practicing as a Nephrologist, was convicted of two instances of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol. The Doctor also had been terminated from several hospitals due to allegations of misbehavior, including verbal harassment of other hospital staff and improper communication with other hospital staff. The Medical Board of California filed a disciplinary Accusation against the Physician. The Medical Board of California entered into a Stipulated Agreement (settlement) with the Doctor for a period of probation, thereby avoiding an embarrassing Hearing before the Office of Administrative Hearings.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Accusation Against Physician: A Riverside Physician in the practice of Emergency Medicine faced a Medical Board of California Accusation. The Doctor received two misdemeanor convictions for Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (DUI). A settlement proposal submitted to the Medical Board of California provided convincing evidence of the client’s rehabilitation and lack of danger to the public. The Medical Board of California entered into a Stipulated Agreement (settlement) with the Physician. The client received Medical Board of California probation with no period of suspension.

Medical Board of California Investigation Case Results

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Investigation Against Physician: A Physician working as an Anesthesiologist at a Los Angeles hospital was accused of several violations. The hospital accused the Doctor of Diverting Medication and working under the influence of prescription narcotics. The Physician was also accused of improperly overprescribing controlled substances to dozens of patients. After conducting an investigation, the Medical Board of California could not prove any of the allegations against the Doctor. The Medical Board of California decided not to refer the matter to the Attorney General’s Office for the filing of a disciplinary Accusation. The Medical Board of California closed the investigation with no disciplinary action.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Investigation Against Physician: A Physician in private family practice in Los Angeles County was convicted of Wet Reckless. The Doctor initially faced criminal charges of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (DUI). The Medical Board of California opened an investigation into the Physician’s Wet Reckless criminal conviction. After presenting the evidence in the most favorable light to the client, the Medical Board of California decided not to refer the matter to the Attorney General’s Office for the filing of a disciplinary Accusation. The Medical Board of California closed the investigation with no disciplinary action.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Investigation Against Physician: A Physician serving as an Obgyn Resident in Los Angeles County was convicted of Exhibition of Speed. The Doctor initially faced criminal charges of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (DUI). The Medical Board of California opened an investigation into the Physician’s Wet Reckless criminal conviction. After presenting the evidence in the most favorable light to the client, the Medical Board of California decided not to refer the matter to the Attorney General’s Office for the filing of a disciplinary Accusation. The Medical Board of California closed the investigation with no disciplinary action.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Investigation Against Physician: A Physician in private family practice in Los Angeles County was convicted of Wet Reckless. The Doctor initially faced criminal charges of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (DUI). The Medical Board of California opened an investigation into the Physician’s Wet Reckless criminal conviction. After presenting the evidence in the most favorable light to the client, the Medical Board of California decided not to refer the matter to the Attorney General’s Office for the filing of a disciplinary Accusation. The Medical Board of California issued the Doctor a Citation.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Investigation Against Physician: A Physician in private family practice in Los Angeles County was arrested for misdemeanor Domestic Violence. The District Attorney’s Office declined to file formal criminal charges. The Medical Board of California opened an investigation into the Doctor’s alleged misconduct. The Medical Board of California closed the investigation with no disciplinary action.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Investigation Against Physician: A Physician specializing in Internal Medicine in Los Angeles County was arrested for misdemeanor Domestic Violence. The District Attorney’s Office declined to file formal criminal charges. The Medical Board of California opened an investigation into the Doctor’s alleged misconduct. The Medical Board of California closed the investigation with no disciplinary action.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Investigation Against Physician: A Physician specializing in Emergency Medicine in Fresno was convicted of DUI. The Medical Board of California opened an investigation into the Doctor’s alleged misconduct. The the client showed significant evidence of mitigation and rehabilitation. The Medical Board of California closed the investigation with no disciplinary action.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Investigation Against Physician Applicant: The Medical Board of California received a Complaint against a Physician and Surgeon License applicant in Bakersfield. The Complaint alleged that the client committed the Unauthorized Practice of Medicine, Unlawful Representation as a Physician and the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine. A review of the evidence showed that the prospective Doctor did not provide any medical advice. Furthermore, the evidence revealed that the client never referred to himself as a licensed, practicing Physician. The Medical Board of California closed the investigation against the prospective Doctor with no disciplinary or criminal charges filed.

Medical Board of California Statement of Issues (License Denial) Case Results

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Statement of Issues (License Denial) Against Physician License Applicant: The Medical Board of California denied a Physician and Surgeon License to an Iowa Doctor with thirty years of practice as an Ophthalmologist. The Iowa Medical Doctor previously received an informal warning from the Iowa Board of Medicine and failed to disclose this on his application for licensure with the Medical Board of California. The matter proceeded to a Settlement Conference with the Medical Board of California at the Office of Administrative Hearings in Los Angeles. The Doctor received his Physician and Surgeon License with a Public Letter of Reprimand (PLR) rather than a disciplinary order of probation.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Statement of Issues (License Denial) Against Physician License Applicant: The Medical Board of California denied a Physician and Surgeon License to a foreign/international Doctor due to educational background and dismissal from a Residency program in the United States. The applicant was able to prove sufficient educational background. The applicant was able to explain the issues with the Residency program in the United States. The Medical Board of California agreed to issue a Physician and Surgeon License to the applicant.

In the Matter of the Medical Board of California Statement of Issues (License Denial) Against Physician License Applicant: The Medical Board of California denied a Physician and Surgeon License to an applicant with two DUI convictions, including one from Medical School. The applicant also failed to disclose one DUI conviction on the license application to the Medical Board of California. After a substantial showing of remorse, mitigation and rehabilitation, the Medical Board of California granted the applicant a Physician and Surgeon License with probationary terms and conditions.

Chicago, Illinois Education Law Attorney

The firm represents students, faculty, educational institutions and social organizations in disciplinary proceedings in Illinois. While legal procedures can vary, each high school district, college, university and graduate school adheres to basic principles of Administrative Law and procedure. The firm possesses extensive knowledge of the Administrative law disciplinary process at institutions of secondary education and higher education. The firm defends students, faculty, educational institutions and social organizations facing Administrative Law disciplinary proceedings in Chicago, Cook County, DuPage County and Lake County. There are numerous areas of discipline defense within Illinois Education Law.

The firm’s Chicago area contact information is:

1901 N. Roselle Road Suite 800
Schaumburg, IL 60195
(847) 495-8309

It is important to retain an attorney with knowledge of Illinois Administrative Law and procedure when facing the following legal matters in Illinois:

• College and University Disciplinary Hearing
• College Student Athlete Disciplinary Hearing
• Dental School Disciplinary Hearing
• Fraternity and Sorority Disciplinary Hearing
• Fraternity and Sorority Risk Management
• Law School Disciplinary Hearing
• Medical School Disciplinary Hearing
• Pharmacy School Disciplinary Hearing
• School District Expulsion Hearings

Students, faculty, educational institutions and social organizations facing disciplinary proceedings in Chicago, Cook County, DuPage County and Lake County should contact an experienced Illinois Education Lawyer for representation.

The firm’s Chicago area contact information is:

1901 N. Roselle Road Suite 800
Schaumburg, IL 60195
(847) 495-8309

Illinois Municipal Business Permit Defense Lawyer

The State of Illinois municipalities to regulate businesses in their village and municipal limits. Municipal and County business licensing is part of the Illinois Administrative Law process. For Village Business License and Municipal Business Permit holders who face disciplinary action, the consequences are profound. The business license and business permit disciplinary process in each municipality is complex, procedural and time consuming. Individuals and businesses facing an Illinois Village Business License Complaint, Hearing or Revocation should seek legal representation from an experienced Chicago Municipal Business License Defense Attorney.

The firm’s Chicago area contact information is:

1901 N. Roselle Road Suite 800
Schaumburg, IL 60195
(847) 495-8309

Illinois municipalities differ slightly in the types of businesses that are licensed and regulated. The following list provides a sample of businesses that may require village business licenses or village business permits:

Amusement Bar/Lounge/Nightclub Barbershop/Hair Salon Bowling Alley Building Contractor Cafe Car Dealership Commercial Retailer/Retail Store Coin Operated Machine Operator Convenience Store Day Care

Factory/Warehouse Firearms Dealer Gas Station Grocery Store Home Based Business Hotel/Motel House of Worship Jewelry Store Liquor Sales Lottery Massage Parlor

Nursing Home Pawnshop Pool Hall Private School Restaurant Taxi/Rideshare Valet Vending Machine Operator Video Arcade Video Poker

Illinois Business Permit Defense Lawyer

The majority of Illinois Village Business Permit investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Illinois Municipal Business Permit Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. Generally, the Village’s Police Department primarily conducts complaint investigations against holders of Illinois Business Permits. In some municipalities, non sworn civilian officials, or the Village Manager, conduct compliance inspections and investigations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the Illinois Business Permit disciplinary process. At the conclusion of an Illinois Business License Investigation, the Village has several options. The municipality can choose to close the Complaint. The matter may be referred for Administrative Action. Administrative Action can include the suspension or revocation of the Business License or Business Permit. The case may also be referred to the State’s Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

The Administrative Law process often culminates in an Administrative Law Hearing. Most counties, municipalities and villages appoint a Hearing Officer to preside over the Administrative Law Hearing. However, in some cities, the City Council, County Commissioners or Village Council may preside over the Administrative Law Hearing. If you are a Business License or Business Permit holder in Illinois facing a suspension or revocation, contact a Chicago Business License and Business Permit Defense Attorney for representation.

Illinois Business License and Business Permit Attorney

If the county, municipality or village recommends disciplinary action against a Business Permit holder, the Business License holder must respond. Failure to respond can result in a default and automatic revocation of the Business Permit or License. An Administrative Law procedure can result in the suspension or revocation of an Illinois Village Business License or Business Permit. In some cases, it is possible for businesses to reach a settlement with the village or municipality. If a settlement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before either a Hearing Officer or the City (Village) Council. If the matter is heard before the County, the County Commission may hear the matter directly. Illinois Village Business License holders and Municipal Business Permit holders facing a suspension nor revocation Hearing should contact an experienced Illinois Business License and Business Permit Defense Lawyer for representation.

Illinois Business License and Business Permit Hearing Attorney

Hearings Officers on behalf of Illinois counties, municipalities and villages conduct Hearings for the following matters:

• Business License and Business Permit Disciplinary Hearings
• Business License and Business Permit Suspension and Revocation Hearings
• Business License and Business Permit Denial Appeals

A Village Business License disciplinary Hearing is conducted in a more informal manner than in Circuit Court. A Village or City Council may appoint a Hearing Officer to preside over the Administrative Law Hearing. The Hearing Officer makes a recommended decision with specific factual findings. The recommended decision is then transmitted to the Village Council or City Council. In cases of a County matter, the recommended decision is transmitted to the County Commission. The Final Decision of a County, Municipality, or Village can be appealed to Circuit Court. Illinois Business Permit holders facing disciplinary action need effective representation from a Chicago Business License Hearing Lawyer.

Illinois Municipal Business Permit and Criminal Convictions

Villages in Illinois can discipline Business License holders and Business Permit holders for criminal activity and criminal convictions. Villages and counties have wide discretion in disciplining businesses criminal activity and criminal convictions. Common criminal offenses that can cause Business Permit denial and Business License revocation in Illinois are:

• Diverting a Controlled Substance
• Domestic Violence
• DUI
• Healthcare Fraud
• Insurance Fraud
• Medi-Cal Fraud
• Medicare Fraud
• Prescription Pill Fraud (Pill Mill)
• Sex Offenses
• Workers Compensation Fraud

Village Police Departments and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by businesses and individuals with Village Business Licenses. Criminal investigations often involve businesses engaged in Illegal Gambling, Narcotics Sales, Prostitution, Receiving Stolen Property and Unlawful Firearms and Ammunition Sales. Illinois business owners facing criminal charges need an experienced Illinois Business License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings involving Village Business Licenses and Business Permits.

Illinois Business License Denial Appeal Attorney

Village Police Departments generally conduct background investigations for businesses and individuals seeking a Village Business License or Business Permit. In some municipalities, the Planning Department assumes this role. The Police Department or Planning Department may recommend the denial of Business License or Business Permit to the Village Manager. The Village (City) Council has final Administrative authority over whether a Business License or Business Permit is granted or denied. Most Business License and Business Permit denials in Illinois occur due to criminal activity, criminal convictions and unlawful business practices.  Businesses and individuals denied an Illinois Village Business License should contact a Chicago, Illinois Business License Denial Appeal Lawyer for representation.

We represent business owners in Business License and Business Permit disciplinary matters in the following Illinois counties, cities and villages:

Cook County: Arlington Heights, Chicago, Cicero, Des Plaines, Elk Grove Village, Evanston, Glenview, Hoffman Estates, Lincolnwood, Mount Prospect, Northbrook, Niles, Oak Lawn, Oak Park, Orland Park, Palatine, Park Ridge, Prospect Heights, Rosemont, Schaumburg, Skokie, Streamwood, Tinley Park, Wheeling, Wilmette and Winnetka

DuPage County: Addison, Aurora, Bloomingdale, Carol Stream, Downers Grove, Elmhurst, Hanover Park, Lisle, Lombard, Naperville, Villa Park, West Chicago and Wheaton

Lake County: Barrington, Buffalo Grove, Deerfield, Fox Lake, Grayslake, Hawthorn Woods, Highland Park, Kildeer, Lake Forest, Lake Zurich, Libertyville, Long Grove, Vernon Hills and Waukegan

The firm’s Chicago area contact information is:

1901 N. Roselle Road Suite 800
Schaumburg, IL 60195
(847) 495-8309

Chicago, Illinois Financial License Defense Lawyer

The Illinois Department of Professional and Financial Regulation regulates and disciplines licensed professionals in Illinois. IDFPR oversees dozens of advisory boards, covering numerous occupations. The majority of IDFPR licensed professionals are located in the Chicago area.  Most Chicago licensed professionals have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the IDFPR. For licensed professionals who become part of the IDFPR’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Financial License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Licensed professionals facing the IDFPR disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced Chicago, Illinois Financial License Defense Attorney.

The firm’s Chicago area contact information is:

1901 N. Roselle Road Suite 800
Schaumburg, IL 60195
(847) 495-8309

The firm represents Chicago, Illinois Financial licensees possessing the following Illinois Financial licenses:

• Accountant/CPA
• Insurance
• Real Estate Appraier
• Real Estate
• Remittance Agent (Remitter)
• Vehicle Dealer

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of IDFPR Financial License investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, IDFPR Financial License investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Illinois Department of Professional and Financial Regulation utilizes non sworn investigators to conduct non criminal investigations of licensed professionals. IDFPR also partners with local law enforcement agencies to conduct criminal investigations. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the IDFPR Financial License disciplinary process. At the conclusion of an IDFPR Financial Investigation, the Department has several options. IDFPR choose to close the Investigation against the Financial. The Department can choose to issue a Reprimand to the Financial. IDFPR can also choose to file a formal disciplinary Complaint against the Financial. In some cases, the IDFPR Legal Office can also choose to hold a pre filing Disciplinary Conference. The Disciplinary Conference may result in a Consent Agreement with IDFPR. A Consent Agreement is the formal name for a settlement agreement. Licensed professionals facing an IDFPR Investigation should seek legal representation from an experienced Chicago, Illinois Financial License Defense Attorney.

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Complaint Defense Attorney

If the Disciplinary Conference does not result in a Consent Agreement, IDFPR can file a formal disciplinary Complaint against the licensed professional. The licensee must file an Answer to the Complaint. IDFPR and the licensed professional will exchange evidence in a process called discovery. Most Illinois Department of Professional and Financial Regulation Hearings occur in Chicago. A small portion of Hearings occur in Springfield. The IDFPR Administrative Law Court will set a Hearing date. A Hearing date is a trial date. In many cases, IDFPR will also issue a Preliminary Hearing date. At the Preliminary Hearing Court date, there will be an opportunity to discuss evidence and settlement. Prior to the IDFPR Hearing, there may be additional opportunities to settle an Illinois Department of Professional and Profession Regulation Disciplinary Hearing.

Licensed professionals facing an IDFPR Complaint should contact an experienced Chicago, Illinois Financial License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Complaints against Licensed professionals include:

• Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Practice
• Cheating on a License Exam
• Gross Negligence
• Failure to Maintain Adequate Records
• Felony Criminal Convictions
• Incompetence
• Mental Illness
• Misdemeanor Criminal Convictions
• Physical Illness
• Sexual Misconduct

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Hearing Attorney

The Illinois Department of Professional and Financial Regulation maintains its primary Hearing location in Chicago. However, in some cases, IDFPR Hearings occur in Springfield. The IDFPR Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. Our law firm represents clients from all over Illinois, including from Chicago, Cook County, DuPage County, Kane County, Joliet, Lake County, McHenry County, Will County, Arlington Heights, Naperville, Schaumburg and Waukegan.

After the Hearing, the Administrative Law Judge submits the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations. In other words, the ALJ issues a written, recommended decision to the Illinois State Financial Disciplinary Board. The Illinois State Financial Disciplinary Board reviews the Administrative Law Judge’s the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations. The Illinois State Financial Disciplinary Board makes a disciplinary recommendation to the IDFPR Director. The licensed professional then has twenty days to write a response to the Illinois State Financial Disciplinary Board’s disciplinary recommendation to the IDFPR Director. This is called a Twenty Day Notice.

The IDFPR Director then issues a Final Order of Discipline. Financial licensees can appeal the IDFPR Director’s Final Order of Discipline. Final Order of Discipline Appeals are made before the Circuit Court in the County where the Hearing occurred. The Appeal must be made within 35 days of the issuance of the IDFPR’s Final Order of Discipline. Healthcare license discipline may include the following types of discipline:

• Financial License Reprimand
• Financial License Probation
• Financial License Suspension
• Financial License Indefinite Suspension
• Financial License Revocation

Illinois licensed professionals facing an Illinois Department of Professional and Financial Regulation Administrative Law Hearing need representation from a Chicago, Illinois Financial License Defense Lawyer.

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Financial License and Criminal Investigations and Criminal Convictions

Illinois and Chicagoland law enforcement investigate licensed professionals for a variety of criminal acts. While IDFPR does not possess sworn law enforcement power, IDFPR closely with local law enforcement and the County States Attorney’s Office. Many Illinois Department of Professional and Financial Regulation Investigators are retired Police Officers from Chicago and surrounding suburbs. IDFPR will closely monitor criminal investigations involving licensed professionals.

Furthermore, IDFPR can discipline licensed professionals for criminal convictions. Criminal convictions for serious offenses may result in the revocation of a Financial License. IDFPR will closely monitor Criminal Court cases involving licensed professionals. Common criminal offenses that can cause Financial License discipline are:

• Diverting a Controlled Substance
• Domestic Violence
• DUI
• Healthcare Fraud
• Insurance Fraud
• Medi-Cal Fraud
• Medicare Fraud
• Prescription Pill Fraud (Pill Mill)
• Sex Offenses
• Workers Compensation Fraud

Licensed professionals facing criminal charges and financial licensees convicted of criminal offenses need a Chicago, Illinois attorney experienced in both Illinois Criminal Defense and IDFPR Administrative Law Hearing.

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Letter of Denial Appeal Attorney

The Illinois Department of Professional and Financial Regulation can deny a Financial License to an applicant. IDFPR Financial License Denials generally occur for the following reasons:

• Cheating on Financial License Exam
• Dishonesty on Financial License Application
• Felony Criminal Convictions
• Misdemeanor Criminal Convictions
• Misrepresentation on Financial License Application

IDFPR issues an Intent to Deny letter to an applicant. An Intent to Deny letter is also known as a Letter of Denial. The Financial License applicant only has a limited time to Appeal an Intent to Deny Letter. IDFPR may schedule an informal Disciplinary Conference to try and reach a Consent Agreement. A Consent Agreement is also known as a Settlement Agreement.

If the informal Disciplinary Conference does not result in a settlement, the matter will proceed to an IDFPR Administrative Hearing. The IDFPR Administrative Hearing is conducted in the same manner as if the applicant was already a licensed professional facing a formal disciplinary Complaint. However, the applicant bears the burden of proof in a Financial License Denial. The Financial License applicant must prove that he/she has the rehabilitation and moral character necessary to hold a Financial License in Illinois. Applicants denied an IDFPR Financial License should contact a Chicago, Illinois Financial License Denial Lawyer for representation.

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Petition for Restoration Lawyer

Illinois financial licensees who have been subject to IDFPR Financial License discipline in Illinois may file a Petition for Restoration. An Illinois Department of Professional and Financial Regulation Petition for Restoration can be used to terminate probation, suspension and indefinite suspension. An IDFPR Petition for Restoration can also be used as a Petition for Reinstatement of a revoked Financial License. A Petition for Restoration to IDFPR must state the factual and legal reasons why the Petition for Reinstatement should be granted.

The applicant bears the burden of proof to show IDFPR why Restoration or Reinstatement of the Financial License is warranted. In some instances, IDFPR may hold an Administrative Law Hearing to decide whether a Petition for Restoration should be granted. The IDFPR Administrative Hearing is conducted in the same manner as if the applicant was already a licensed professional facing a formal disciplinary Complaint. A successful IDFPR Financial License Petition for Restoration requires representation by an experienced Illinois Financial License Defense Attorney.

The firm’s Chicago area contact information is:

1901 N. Roselle Road Suite 800
Schaumburg, IL 60195
(847) 495-8309

Chicago, Illinois Professional License Defense Lawyer

The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation regulates and disciplines licensed professionals in Illinois. IDFPR oversees dozens of advisory boards, covering numerous occupations. The majority of IDFPR licensed professionals are located in the Chicago area.  Most Chicago licensed professionals have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the IDFPR. For licensed professionals who become part of the IDFPR’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Professional License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Licensed professionals facing the IDFPR disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced Chicago, Illinois Professional License Defense Attorney.

The firm’s Chicago area contact information is:

1901 N. Roselle Road Suite 800
Schaumburg, IL 60195
(847) 495-8309

The firm represents Chicago, Illinois Professional licensees possessing the following Illinois Professional licenses:

Alarm Contractor Architect Auctioneer Barber Boxing Cemetery Manager Community Association Manager

Cosmetologist Engineer Esthetician Funeral Director Geologist Home Inspector Interior Designer

Landscape Architect Land Surveyor Locksmith Private Detective Roofing Contractor Security Guard Shorthand Reporter

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of IDFPR Professional License investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, IDFPR Professional License investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation utilizes non sworn investigators to conduct non criminal investigations of licensed professionals. IDFPR also partners with local law enforcement agencies to conduct criminal investigations. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the IDFPR Professional License disciplinary process. At the conclusion of an IDFPR Professional Investigation, the Department has several options. IDFPR choose to close the Investigation against the Professional. The Department can choose to issue a Reprimand to the Professional. IDFPR can also choose to file a formal disciplinary Complaint against the Professional. In some cases, the IDFPR Legal Office can also choose to hold a pre filing Disciplinary Conference. The Disciplinary Conference may result in a Consent Agreement with IDFPR. A Consent Agreement is the formal name for a settlement agreement. Licensed professionals facing an IDFPR Investigation should seek legal representation from an experienced Chicago, Illinois Professional License Defense Attorney.

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Complaint Defense Attorney

If the Disciplinary Conference does not result in a Consent Agreement, IDFPR can file a formal disciplinary Complaint against the licensed professional. The licensee must file an Answer to the Complaint. IDFPR and the licensed professional will exchange evidence in a process called discovery. Most Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation Hearings occur in Chicago. A small portion of Hearings occur in Springfield. The IDFPR Administrative Law Court will set a Hearing date. A Hearing date is a trial date. In many cases, IDFPR will also issue a Preliminary Hearing date. At the Preliminary Hearing Court date, there will be an opportunity to discuss evidence and settlement. Prior to the IDFPR Hearing, there may be additional opportunities to settle an Illinois Department of Financial and Profession Regulation Disciplinary Hearing.

Licensed professionals facing an IDFPR Complaint should contact an experienced Chicago, Illinois Professional License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Complaints against licensed professionals include:

• Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Practice
• Cheating on a License Exam
• Gross Negligence
• Failure to Maintain Adequate Records
• Felony Criminal Convictions
• Incompetence
• Mental Illness
• Misdemeanor Criminal Convictions
• Physical Illness
• Sexual Misconduct

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Hearing Attorney

The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation maintains its primary Hearing location in Chicago. However, in some cases, IDFPR Hearings occur in Springfield. The IDFPR Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. Our law firm represents clients from all over Illinois, including from Chicago, Cook County, DuPage County, Kane County, Joliet, Lake County, McHenry County, Will County, Arlington Heights, Naperville, Schaumburg and Waukegan.

After the Hearing, the Administrative Law Judge submits the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations. In other words, the ALJ issues a written, recommended decision to the Illinois State Professional Disciplinary Board. The Illinois State Professional Disciplinary Board reviews the Administrative Law Judge’s the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations. The Illinois State Professional Disciplinary Board makes a disciplinary recommendation to the IDFPR Director. The licensed professional then has twenty days to write a response to the Illinois State Professional Disciplinary Board’s disciplinary recommendation to the IDFPR Director. This is called a Twenty Day Notice.

The IDFPR Director then issues a Final Order of Discipline. Professional licensees can appeal the IDFPR Director’s Final Order of Discipline. Final Order of Discipline Appeals are made before the Circuit Court in the County where the Hearing occurred. The Appeal must be made within 35 days of the issuance of the IDFPR’s Final Order of Discipline. Professional License discipline may include the following types of discipline:

• Professional License Reprimand
• Professional License Probation
• Professional License Suspension
• Professional License Indefinite Suspension
• Professional License Revocation

Illinois licensed professionals facing an Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation Administrative Law Hearing need representation from a Chicago, Illinois Professional License Defense Lawyer.

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Professional License and Criminal Investigations and Criminal Convictions

Illinois and Chicagoland law enforcement investigate licensed professionals for a variety of criminal acts. While IDFPR does not possess sworn law enforcement power, IDFPR closely with local law enforcement and the County States Attorney’s Office. Many Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation Investigators are retired Police Officers from Chicago and surrounding suburbs. IDFPR will closely monitor criminal investigations involving licensed professionals.

Furthermore, IDFPR can discipline licensed professionals for criminal convictions. Criminal convictions for serious offenses may result in the revocation of a Professional License. IDFPR will closely monitor Criminal Court cases involving licensed professionals. Common criminal offenses that can cause Professional License discipline are:

• Diverting a Controlled Substance
• Domestic Violence
• DUI
• Healthcare Fraud
• Insurance Fraud
• Medi-Cal Fraud
• Medicare Fraud
• Prescription Pill Fraud (Pill Mill)
• Sex Offenses
• Workers Compensation Fraud

Licensed professionals facing criminal charges and professional licensees convicted of criminal offenses need a Chicago, Illinois attorney experienced in both Illinois Criminal Defense and IDFPR Administrative Law Hearing.

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Letter of Denial Appeal Attorney

The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation can deny a Professional License to an applicant. IDFPR Professional License Denials generally occur for the following reasons:

• Cheating on Professional License Exam
• Dishonesty on Professional License Application
• Felony Criminal Convictions
• Misdemeanor Criminal Convictions
• Misrepresentation on Professional License Application

IDFPR issues an Intent to Deny letter to an applicant. An Intent to Deny letter is also known as a Letter of Denial. The Professional License applicant only has a limited time to Appeal an Intent to Deny Letter. IDFPR may schedule an informal Disciplinary Conference to try and reach a Consent Agreement. A Consent Agreement is also known as a Settlement Agreement.

If the informal Disciplinary Conference does not result in a settlement, the matter will proceed to an IDFPR Administrative Hearing. The IDFPR Administrative Hearing is conducted in the same manner as if the applicant was already a licensed professional facing a formal disciplinary Complaint. However, the applicant bears the burden of proof in a Professional License Denial. The Professional License applicant must prove that he/she has the rehabilitation and moral character necessary to hold a Professional License in Illinois. Applicants denied an IDFPR Professional License should contact a Chicago, Illinois Professional License Denial Lawyer for representation.

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Petition for Restoration Lawyer

Illinois professional licensees who have been subject to IDFPR Professional License discipline in Illinois may file a Petition for Restoration. An Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation Petition for Restoration can be used to terminate probation, suspension and indefinite suspension. An IDFPR Petition for Restoration can also be used as a Petition for Reinstatement of a revoked Professional License. A Petition for Restoration to IDFPR must state the factual and legal reasons why the Petition for Reinstatement should be granted.

The applicant bears the burden of proof to show IDFPR why Restoration or Reinstatement of the Professional License is warranted. In some instances, IDFPR may hold an Administrative Law Hearing to decide whether a Petition for Restoration should be granted. The IDFPR Administrative Hearing is conducted in the same manner as if the applicant was already a licensed professional facing a formal disciplinary Complaint. A successful IDFPR Professional License Petition for Restoration requires representation by an experienced Illinois Professional License Defense Attorney.

The firm’s Chicago area contact information is:

1901 N. Roselle Road Suite 800
Schaumburg, IL 60195
(847) 495-8309

Chicago, Illinois Healthcare License Defense Lawyer

The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation regulates and disciplines licensed medical and healthcare professionals in Illinois. IDFPR oversees dozens of advisory boards, covering numerous occupations. The majority of IDFPR licensed medical and healthcare professionals are located in the Chicago area.  Most Chicago Licensed medical and healthcare professionals have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the IDFPR. For Licensed medical and healthcare professionals who become part of the IDFPR’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Medical license disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Licensed medical and healthcare professionals facing the IDFPR disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced Chicago, Illinois Medical License Defense Attorney.

The firm’s Chicago area contact information is:

1901 N. Roselle Road Suite 800
Schaumburg, IL 60195
(847) 495-8309

The firm represents Chicago, Illinois Medical and Healthcare licensees possessing the following Illinois Medical licenses and Illinois Healthcare licenses:

Acupuncturist Chiropractor Clinical Psychologist Clinical Social Worker Dental Hygienist Dentist Dietitian Doctor (Physician) Environmental Health Practitioner Euthanasia Technician

Genetic Counselor Licensed Practical Nurse Marriage and Family Therapist Massage Therapist Nursing Home Administrator Pharmacist Occupational Therapist Optometrist Paramedic Pharmacy Technician

Physical Therapist Physician (Doctor) Physician Assistant Podiatrist Professional Counselor Registered Nurse Respiratory Care Therapist Speech Pathologist Veterinarian Veterinarian Technician

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of IDFPR Medical license investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, IDFPR Medical Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Illinois Department of Financial and Medical Regulation utilizes non sworn investigators to conduct non criminal investigations of Licensed medical and healthcare professionals. IDFPR also partners with local law enforcement agencies to conduct criminal investigations. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the IDFPR Medical License disciplinary process. At the conclusion of an IDFPR Medical Investigation, the Department has several options. IDFPR choose to close the Investigation against the Medical. The Department can choose to issue a Reprimand to the Medical. IDFPR can also choose to file a formal disciplinary Complaint against the Medical. In some cases, the IDFPR Legal Office can also choose to hold a pre filing Disciplinary Conference. The Disciplinary Conference may result in a Consent Agreement with IDFPR. A Consent Agreement is the formal name for a settlement agreement. Licensed medical and healthcare professionals facing an IDFPR Investigation should seek legal representation from an experienced Chicago, Illinois Medical License Defense Attorney.

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Complaint Defense Attorney

If the Disciplinary Conference does not result in a Consent Agreement, IDFPR can file a formal disciplinary Complaint against the Medical. The Medical must file an Answer to the Complaint. IDFPR and the Medical will exchange evidence in a process called discovery. Most Illinois Department of Financial and Medical Regulation Hearings occur in Chicago. A small portion of Hearings occur in Springfield. The IDFPR Administrative Law Court will set a Hearing date. A Hearing date is a trial date. In many cases, IDFPR will also issue a Preliminary Hearing date. At the Preliminary Hearing Court date, there will be an opportunity to discuss evidence and settlement. Prior to the IDFPR Hearing, there may be additional opportunities to settle an Illinois Department of Financial and Profession Regulation Disciplinary Hearing.

Licensed medical and healthcare professionals facing an IDFPR Complaint should contact an experienced Chicago, Illinois Medical License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Complaints against Licensed medical and healthcare professionals include:

• Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Practice
• Cheating on a License Exam
• Gross Negligence
• Failure to Maintain Adequate Records
• Felony Criminal Convictions
• Incompetence
• Mental Illness
• Misdemeanor Criminal Convictions
• Physical Illness
• Sexual Misconduct

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Hearing Attorney

The Illinois Department of Financial and Medical Regulation maintains its primary Hearing location in Chicago. However, in some cases, IDFPR Hearings occur in Springfield. The IDFPR Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. Our law firm represents clients from all over Illinois, including from Chicago, Cook County, DuPage County, Kane County, Joliet, Lake County, McHenry County, Will County, Arlington Heights, Naperville, Schaumburg and Waukegan.

After the Hearing, the Administrative Law Judge submits the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations. In other words, the ALJ issues a written, recommended decision to the Illinois State Medical Disciplinary Board. The Illinois State Medical Disciplinary Board reviews the Administrative Law Judge’s the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations. The Illinois State Medical Disciplinary Board makes a disciplinary recommendation to the IDFPR Director. The Medical then has twenty days to write a response to the Illinois State Medical Disciplinary Board’s disciplinary recommendation to the IDFPR Director. This is called a Twenty Day Notice.

The IDFPR Director then issues a Final Order of Discipline. Licensed medical and healthcare professionals can appeal the IDFPR Director’s Final Order of Discipline. Final Order of Discipline Appeals are made before the Circuit Court in the County where the Hearing occurred. The Appeal must be made within 35 days of the issuance of the IDFPR’s Final Order of Discipline. Healthcare license discipline may include the following types of discipline:

• Medical License Reprimand
• Medical License Probation
• Medical License Suspension
• Medical License Indefinite Suspension
• Medical License Revocation

Illinois licensed medical and healthcare professionals facing an Illinois Department of Financial and Medical Regulation Administrative Law Hearing need representation from a Chicago, Illinois Medical License Defense Lawyer.

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Medical License and Criminal Investigations and Criminal Convictions

Illinois and Chicagoland law enforcement investigate Licensed medical and healthcare professionals for a variety of criminal acts. While IDFPR does not possess sworn law enforcement power, IDFPR closely with local law enforcement and the County States Attorney’s Office. Many Illinois Department of Financial and Medical Regulation Investigators are retired Police Officers from Chicago and surrounding suburbs. IDFPR will closely monitor criminal investigations involving Licensed medical and healthcare professionals.

Furthermore, IDFPR can discipline licensed medical and healthcare professionals for criminal convictions. Criminal convictions for serious offenses may result in the revocation of a Medical License. IDFPR will closely monitor Criminal Court cases involving Licensed medical and healthcare professionals. Common criminal offenses that can cause Medical License discipline are:

• Diverting a Controlled Substance
• Domestic Violence
• DUI
• Healthcare Fraud
• Insurance Fraud
• Medi-Cal Fraud
• Medicare Fraud
• Prescription Pill Fraud (Pill Mill)
• Sex Offenses
• Workers Compensation Fraud

Licensed medical and healthcare professionals facing criminal charges and licensed medical and healthcare professionals convicted of criminal offenses need a Chicago, Illinois attorney experienced in both Illinois Criminal Defense and IDFPR Administrative Law Hearing.

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Letter of Denial Appeal Attorney

The Illinois Department of Financial and Medical Regulation can deny a Medical License to an applicant. IDFPR Medical License Denials generally occur for the following reasons:

• Cheating on Medical License Exam
• Dishonesty on Medical License Application
• Felony Criminal Convictions
• Misdemeanor Criminal Convictions
• Misrepresentation on Medical License Application

IDFPR issues an Intent to Deny letter to an applicant. An Intent to Deny letter is also known as a Letter of Denial. The Medical License applicant only has a limited time to Appeal an Intent to Deny Letter. IDFPR may schedule an informal Disciplinary Conference to try and reach a Consent Agreement. A Consent Agreement is also known as a Settlement Agreement.

If the informal Disciplinary Conference does not result in a settlement, the matter will proceed to an IDFPR Administrative Hearing. The IDFPR Administrative Hearing is conducted in the same manner as if the applicant was already a Medical facing a formal disciplinary Complaint. However, the applicant bears the burden of proof in a Medical License Denial. The Medical License applicant must prove that he/she has the rehabilitation and moral character necessary to hold a Medical License in Illinois. Applicants denied an IDFPR Medical License should contact a Chicago, Illinois Medical License Denial Lawyer for representation.

Chicago, Illinois IDFPR Petition for Restoration Lawyer

Illinois Licensed medical and healthcare professionals who have been subject to IDFPR Medical License discipline in Illinois may file a Petition for Restoration. An Illinois Department of Financial and Medical Regulation Petition for Restoration can be used to terminate probation, suspension and indefinite suspension. An IDFPR Petition for Restoration can also be used as a Petition for Reinstatement of a revoked Medical License. A Petition for Restoration to IDFPR must state the factual and legal reasons why the Petition for Reinstatement should be granted.

The applicant bears the burden of proof to show IDFPR why Restoration or Reinstatement of the Medical License is warranted. In some instances, IDFPR may hold an Administrative Law Hearing to decide whether a Petition for Restoration should be granted. The IDFPR Administrative Hearing is conducted in the same manner as if the applicant was already a Medical facing a formal disciplinary Complaint. A successful IDFPR Medical License Petition for Restoration requires representation by an experienced Illinois Medical License Defense Attorney.

The firm’s Chicago area contact information is:

1901 N. Roselle Road Suite 800
Schaumburg, IL 60195
(847) 495-8309

Dental Board of California Statement of Issues Defense Lawyer

The Dental Board of California, known as the DBC, licenses approximately 35,000 Dentists in the State of California. Applicants who are Dentists licensed in another state, graduates of American Dental schools and international and foreign Dental student graduates must apply for a Dental License from the Dental Board of California. Unfortunately, many applicants are denied a Dental License from the Dental Board of California. Applicants denied a Dentist License in California should seek legal representation from an experienced California Dental License Statement of Issues Defense Attorney.

Dental Board of California Dental License Statement of Issues Defense Lawyer

A Dental License applicant denied a Dentist License from the Dental Board of California will receive a Statement of Issues document. A Statement of Issues served on a California Dental License applicant states the reasons for denial. The Dental License applicant, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default Denial against the Dental License applicant.

In many cases, it is possible for California Dental License applicants to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Dental Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). California Dental License applicants facing a Dental Board of California Statement of Issues for a Dentist License Denial should contact an experienced Dental Board of California Statement of Issues Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes for denial of a Dental License are:

• Academic dishonesty
• Competency issues
• Disciplinary history with another licensing agency
• Failure to disclose required information on the Dental License application
• Incomplete Dental License application
• Dental degree is from an institution not recognized by the Dental Board of California
• Misstatements on the Dental License application

 Dental Board of California Dental License Statement of Issues Denial Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Dental Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Dental Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Dentist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Dental License applicant can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Applicants for a Dental License facing a Dental Board of California Administrative Law Hearing for a Dental License Denial need effective representation from a Dental Board of California Dental License Statement of Issues Defense Lawyer.

Dental Board of California Dental License Denial Attorney for Foreign/International Medical School Graduates

Foreign and international medical school graduates applying for a Dental License issued by the Dental Board of California can face unique challenges. There are many reasons for the Dental Board of California to deny a Dental License. Foreign and international medical school graduates facing a Dental License denial from the Dental Board of California should consult with a Dental Board of California Statement of Issues Defense Lawyer. Our law firm works with foreign and international dental school graduates denied a California Dental License from the following locations:

• Asia
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bhutan
  • Cambodia
  • Georgia
  • India
  • Japan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Mongolia
  • Nepal
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • South Korea
  • Thailand
  • Uzbekistan
  • Vietnam
• Middle East
  • Bahrain
  • Egypt
  • Israel
  • Jordan
  • Kuwait
  • Oman
  • Qatar
  • Saudi Arabia
  • United Arab Emirates
• Africa
  • Angola
  • Botswana
  • Cameroon
  • Chad
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Ethiopia
  • Eritrea
  • Ghana
  • Guinea
  • Kenya
  • Lesotho
  • Liberia
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Morocco
  • Namibia
  • Rwanda
  • Senegal
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Togo
  • Uganda
  • Zambia
• Australia and New Zealand
• Caribbean
  • Anguilla and Barbuda
  • Antigua
  • Aruba
  • British Virgin Islands
  • Bahamas
  • Cayman Islands
  • Curacao
  • Dominica
  • Dominican Republic
  • Grenada
  • Haiti
  • Saint Lucia
  • Sint Maarten
  • Trinidad & Tobago
• Europe
  • Albania
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina
  • Bulgaria
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Denmark
  • Estonia
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Hungary
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Kosovo
  • Latvia
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Moldova
  • Monaco
  • Montenegro
  • Norway
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Romania
  • Serbia
  • Slovakia
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • The Netherlands
  • United Kingdom/Great Britain (England, Scotland, Wales)
  • Ukraine
• Latin America
  • Argentina
  • Belize
  • Bolivia
  • Brazil
  • Chile
  • Colombia
  • Costa Rica
  • Ecuador
  • Mexico
  • Panama
  • Paraguay
  • Uruguay

Medical Board of California Statement of Issues Defense Lawyer

The Medical Board of California, known as the MBC, licenses approximately 120,000 Physicians in the State of California. Individuals who are Physicians licensed in another state can apply for a traditional Physician’s and Surgeon’s License from the Medical Board of California. However, different rules apply for graduates of Medical Board of California approved medical schools who are not already licensed Physicians in another state. These individuals must be accepted into an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited postgraduate training program in California and obtain a Postgraduate Training License (PTL) within 180 days. Thus, most Residents in Residency Programs and many Fellows in Fellowship programs must receive a PTL within 6 months of enrollment. The Postgraduate Training License is valid for 39 months. After 36 months, the Resident or Fellow must obtain a Physician and Surgeon License from the Medical Board of California. Unfortunately, many applicants are denied a Physician License from the Medical Board of California. Applicants denied a Physicians License in California should seek legal representation from an experienced California Physicians License Statement of Issues Defense Attorney.

Medical Board of California Physician License Statement of Issues Defense Lawyer

A Physician and Surgeon License applicant denied a Physicians License from the Medical Board of California will receive a Statement of Issues document. A Statement of Issues served on a California Physician License applicant states the reasons for denial. The Physician and Surgeon License applicant, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default Denial against the Physician License applicant.

In many cases, it is possible for California Physician License applicants to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Medical Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). California Physician License applicants facing a Medical Board of California Statement of Issues for a Physician’s and Surgeon’s License Denial should contact an experienced Medical Board of California Statement of Issues Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes for denial of a Physician License are:

• Academic dishonesty
• Competency issues
• Disciplinary history with another licensing agency
• Failure to disclose required information on the Physician License application
• Incomplete Physician License application
• Medical degree is from an institution not recognized by the Medical Board of California
• Misstatements on the Physician License application

 Medical Board of California Physician License Statement of Issues Denial Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Medical Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Medical Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Doctor to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physician License applicant can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Applicants for a Physician License facing a Medical Board of California Administrative Law Hearing for a Physician License Denial need effective representation from a Medical Board of California Physician License Statement of Issues Defense Lawyer.

Medical Board of California Physician License Denial Attorney for Foreign/International Medical School Graduates

Foreign and international medical school graduates applying for a PTL or Physician License issued by the Medical Board of California can face unique challenges. There are many reasons for the Medical Board of California to deny a PTL or Physician License. Foreign and international medical school graduates facing a Postgraduate Training License Denial or Physician License from the Medical Board of California should consult with a Medical Board of California Statement of Issues Defense Lawyer. Our law firm works with foreign and international medical school graduates denied a Postgraduate Training License (PTL) or California Physician License from the following locations:

• Asia
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bhutan
  • Cambodia
  • Georgia
  • India
  • Japan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Mongolia
  • Nepal
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • South Korea
  • Thailand
  • Uzbekistan
  • Vietnam
• Middle East
  • Bahrain
  • Egypt
  • Israel
  • Jordan
  • Kuwait
  • Oman
  • Qatar
  • Saudi Arabia
  • United Arab Emirates
• Africa
  • Angola
  • Botswana
  • Cameroon
  • Chad
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Ethiopia
  • Eritrea
  • Ghana
  • Guinea
  • Kenya
  • Lesotho
  • Liberia
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Morocco
  • Namibia
  • Rwanda
  • Senegal
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Togo
  • Uganda
  • Zambia
• Australia and New Zealand
• Caribbean
  • Anguilla and Barbuda
  • Antigua
  • Aruba
  • British Virgin Islands
  • Bahamas
  • Cayman Islands
  • Curacao
  • Dominica
  • Dominican Republic
  • Grenada
  • Haiti
  • Saint Lucia
  • Sint Maarten
  • Trinidad & Tobago
• Europe
  • Albania
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina
  • Bulgaria
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Denmark
  • Estonia
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Hungary
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Kosovo
  • Latvia
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Moldova
  • Monaco
  • Montenegro
  • Norway
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Romania
  • Serbia
  • Slovakia
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • The Netherlands
  • United Kingdom/Great Britain (England, Scotland, Wales)
  • Ukraine
• Latin America
  • Argentina
  • Belize
  • Bolivia
  • Brazil
  • Chile
  • Colombia
  • Costa Rica
  • Ecuador
  • Mexico
  • Panama
  • Paraguay
  • Uruguay