Blog

California Coastal Commission Enforcement Defense Lawyer

The California Coastal Commission enforces access to the California coastline and beaches in the State of California. The California Coastal Commission enforces regulations for Coastal Development Permits (CDPs) and coastal habitats and coastal public access. Most landowners on the California coast minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Coastal Commission. For individuals that become part of the California Coastal Commission disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The California Coastal Commission enforcement disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Individuals facing the California Coastal Commission disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Coastal Commission Enforcement Defense Attorney.

Common causes of action for California Coastal Commission Administrative Enforcement Actions against California coastal landowners include:

• Building Code Violations
• Changes in Property Use
• Coastal Development Permit (CDP) Violations
• California Fish and Game Code Violations
• Environmental Violations
• Illegal Fencing
• Municipal Code Violations
• Public Access Violations
• Unlawful Construction
• Unpermitted Development

California Coastal Commission Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Coastal Commission investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Coastal Commission Investigations also occur through sting operations and criminal investigations. The California Coastal Commission utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct investigations. These employees investigate Administrative Law violations under the jurisdiction of the California Coastal Commission. California Coastal Commission enforcement staff often work closely with the California Attorney General’s Office and local law enforcement. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Coastal Commission disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Coastal Commission investigation, the California Coastal Commission has several options. The California Coastal Commission can choose to close the Investigation. The California Coastal Commission can hold an informal conference to try to resolve the enforcement action. The California Coastal Commission can choose to issue a Citation. The California Coastal Commission can also choose to initiate a Notice of Violation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the California Coastal Commission may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office or Attorney General’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a landowner on the California coastline facing a California Coastal Commission investigation, contact a California Coastal Commission Investigation Defense Attorney for representation.

California Coastal Commission Citation and Enforcement Action Defense Attorney

A California Coastal Commission Administrative disciplinary enforcement action contains numerous consequences. Maximum fines for violations are astronomical. In many instances, these fines can be reduced through negotiations with the California Coastal Commission. If a violation cannot be settled, the violation can proceed to a Hearing before the California Coastal Commission. Individuals facing a California Coastal Commission Enforcement Action should contact an experienced California Coastal Commission Enforcement Action Defense Attorney for representation.

California Coastal Commission Hearing Attorney

The California Coastal Commission is headquartered in Sacrament and maintains several District Office locations. These District locations are in Arcata, Long Beach, San Diego, San Francisco Santa Cruz and Ventura. In some instances, Hearings may be held in Los Angeles, Oakland, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before the California Coastal Commission.

The California Coastal Commission action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows an individual to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the landowner can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California coastal landowners facing a California Coastal Commission Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Coastal Commission Enforcement Action Defense Lawyer.

California Coastal Commission and Criminal Investigations

The California Coastal Commission often investigates criminal violations related to coastal regulations. The California Coastal Commission can refer matters for criminal prosecution to local District Attorney’s Offices and the California Attorney General’s Office. In some instances, California Coast Commission Administrative Law violations are also criminal offenses. California coastal landowners facing criminal investigation and criminal prosecution arising from a California Coastal Commission Investigation need an experienced California Coastal Commission Defense Attorney for representation.

California Department of Public Health License Defense Lawyer

The California Department of Public Health, known as the CDPH, licenses approximately over 10,000 healthcare facilities in the State of California. Most California licensed healthcare facilities have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Department of Public Health. For Licensees who become part of the California Department of Public Health disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The CDPH License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Licensees facing the California Department of Public Health disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Department of Public Health License Defense Attorney.

The California Department of Public Health issues the following types of healthcare facility licenses:

• Acute Psychiatric Hospital
• Ambulatory Surgical Center
• Blood Bank
• Chronic Dialysis Clinic
• Clinical Laboratory Facility
• Community Clinic
• Congregate Living Health Facility
• Cytology Laboratory
• Home Health Agency
• Hospice
• Hospital
• Intermediate Care Facility
• Skilled Nursing Facility
• Tissue Bank

California CDPH Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Department of Public Health investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Department of Public Health Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Department of Public Health utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Licensees. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Department of Public Health disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Department of Public Health investigation, the Department has several options. The Department can choose to close the Complaint. The Department can choose to issue a Citation. The Department can also choose to file a revocation action. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Department may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a licensed healthcare facility facing a California Department of Public Health investigation, contact a California Department of Public Health License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Department of Public Health Enforcement Defense Attorney

A formal enforcement action served on a California CDPH licensee serves as notice to a licensee that the Department intends to discipline the facility. Types of penalties include:

• Failure to Report Adverse Events Penalties
• Failure to Report Medical Breaches Penalties
• Immediate Jeopardy Administrative Penalties
• Medical Breach Administrative Penalties
• Non immediate Jeopardy Administrative Penalties
• State Citations for Long Term Care Penalties

An Enforcement Action is a serious matter that can result in significant financial penalties and the suspension or revocation of a CDPH healthcare facility license in California. In many cases, it is possible for Licensees to reach a Settlement Agreement with the CDPH Legal Enforcement Office and California Department of Public Health. If a Settlement Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before a CDPH Administrative Law Judge. Licensed healthcare facilities facing a California Department of Public Health Enforcement Action should contact an experienced California Department of Public Health License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against CDPH licensed facilities include:

Elder Abuse Elder Theft Failure to Maintain Records Failure to Report Adverse Event HIPAA Violation Medication Error

Medical Error Negligent Death Negligence in the Practice of Medicine Negligent Patient Care

Nursing Staff Ratio Violation Patient Abuse Sexual Assault on a Patient Violation of Patient Rights Willful Material Falsification

California Department of Public Health Hearing Attorney

The California Department of Public Health maintains several Court Hearing locations that correspond to District Office locations. These locations are Bakersfield, Chico, Fresno, Los Angeles, Oakland, Orange County, Riverside, Sacramento, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Rosa and Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision subsequent to the Hearing. The California Department of Public Health can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Department of Public Health action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a licensee to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the licensee can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Licensees facing a California Department of Public Health Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Department of Public Health License Defense Lawyer.

California Department of Public Health License and Criminal Convictions

The California Department of Public Health can discipline facility licensees for criminal convictions. California Department of Public Health discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a licensee. Common criminal offenses that can cause CDPH License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Department of Public Health and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Licensees in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Licensees engaged in Elder Abuse, Healthcare Fraud, Medi-Cal Fraud and Medicare Fraud. In serious criminal cases against Licensees pending in Criminal Court, the California Department of Public Health and the CDPH Legal Enforcement Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the licensee. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a CDPH License in Criminal Court. Licensees facing criminal charges and Licensees who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Department of Public Health License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Department of Public Health.

California Department of Public Health Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Department of Public Health thoroughly investigates all applicants for CDPH Licenses. The California Department of Public Health may deny a license to licensees from other states and countries. Most California Department of Public Health denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the license application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before an Administrative Law Judge maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a CDPH License should contact a California Department of Public Health License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Department of Public Health Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Department of Public Health Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Licensees who have received a CDPH License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Department of Public Health. A successful Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Department of Public Health License Defense Attorney.

California Board of Psychology License Defense Lawyer in Orange County

The California Board of Psychology, known as the BOP, licenses approximately 18,000 Psychologists in the State of California. Most Orange County Psychologists have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Board of Psychology. For Psychologists who become part of the California Board of Psychology’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Psychologist License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Psychologists facing the California Board of Psychology disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced Orange County Psychologist License Defense Attorney.

California Board of Psychology Investigation Defense Lawyer in Orange County

The majority of California Board of Psychology investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Board of Psychology Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Board of Psychology utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Psychologists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Board of Psychology disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Board of Psychology investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Psychologist facing a California Board of Psychology investigation, contact an Orange County Psychologist License Defense Attorney for representation.

Orange County Psychologist License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on an Orange County Psychologist serves as notice to a Psychologist that the Board intends to revoke the Psychologist License. The Psychologist, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Psychologist. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Psychologist License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Psychologist License in Orange County. In many cases, it is possible for Psychologists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Board of Psychology. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) in Los Angeles or San Diego. Psychologists facing a California Board of Psychology Accusation should contact an experienced Orange County Psychologist License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Psychologists include:

Accepting or Paying Referral Fees Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Psychologist Activity Dishonest, Corrupt or Fraudulent Act Gross Negligence

Improper Advertising Practice Outside Fields of Competence Repeated Negligent Acts Sexual Misconduct to a Patient

Unprofessional Conduct Use of a Controlled Substance or Alcohol in a Dangerous Manner Violation of Confidentiality Violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct

Orange County Psychologist License Hearing Attorney

T he California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. The OAH Los Angeles Office serves the northern portion of Orange County. The OAH San Diego Office serves the Southern portion of Orange County. In some instances, Hearings are held at locations in Orange County in Anaheim, Irvine and Santa Ana. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Board of Psychology can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Board of Psychology’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. Orange County Government Code § 11521 allows a Psychologist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to Orange County Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Psychologist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Orange County Psychologists facing a California Board of Psychology Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from an Orange County Psychologist License Defense Lawyer.

Orange County Psychologist License and Criminal Convictions

The California Board of Psychology can discipline Psychologists for criminal convictions. California Board of Psychology discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Psychologist. Common criminal offenses that can cause Psychologist License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Board of Psychology and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Psychologists in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Psychologists engaged in Insurance Fraud, Unlawful Practice of Medicine and Unlawful Representation as a Physician. In serious criminal cases against Psychologists pending in Criminal Court, the California Board of Psychology and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Psychologist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Psychologist License in Criminal Court. Psychologists facing criminal charges and Psychologists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced Orange County Psychologist License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Board of Psychology.

Orange County Psychologist License Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Board of Psychology thoroughly investigates all applicants for Psychologist Licenses. The California Board of Psychology may deny an Orange County Psychologist License to Psychologist students and Psychologists from other states and countries. Most Orange County Psychologist License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Psychologist License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Psychologist License should contact an Orange County Psychologist License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Board of Psychology Statement of Issues Hearing.

Orange County Psychologist Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Psychologists who have received a Psychologist License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Psychologist License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Board of Psychology. A successful Psychologist License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced Orange County Psychologist License Defense Attorney.

California Board of Psychology License Defense Lawyer in Ventura County

The California Board of Psychology, known as the BOP, licenses approximately 18,000 Psychologists in the State of California. Most Ventura County Psychologists have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Board of Psychology. For Psychologists who become part of the California Board of Psychology’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Psychologist License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Psychologists facing the California Board of Psychology disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced Ventura County Psychologist License Defense Attorney.

California Board of Psychology Investigation Defense Lawyer in Ventura County

The majority of California Board of Psychology investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Board of Psychology Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Board of Psychology utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Psychologists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Board of Psychology disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Board of Psychology investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Psychologist facing a California Board of Psychology investigation, contact a Ventura County Psychologist License Defense Attorney for representation.

Ventura County Psychologist License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a Ventura County Psychologist serves as notice to a Psychologist that the Board intends to revoke the Psychologist License. The Psychologist, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Psychologist. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Psychologist License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Psychologist License in Ventura County. In many cases, it is possible for Psychologists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Board of Psychology. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) in Los Angeles. Psychologists facing a California Board of Psychology Accusation should contact an experienced Ventura County Psychologist License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Psychologists include:

Accepting or Paying Referral Fees Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Psychologist Activity Dishonest, Corrupt or Fraudulent Act Gross Negligence

Improper Advertising Practice Outside Fields of Competence Repeated Negligent Acts Sexual Misconduct to a Patient

Unprofessional Conduct Use of a Controlled Substance or Alcohol in a Dangerous Manner Violation of Confidentiality Violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct

Ventura County Psychologist License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. One of these Court locations is located in Downtown Los Angeles. The OAH Los Angeles Office serves Ventura County. In some instances, Hearings are held at locations in Ventura County in Camarillo, Oxnard, Thousand Oaks and Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Board of Psychology can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Board of Psychology’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. Ventura County Government Code § 11521 allows a Psychologist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to Ventura County Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Psychologist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Ventura County Psychologists facing a California Board of Psychology Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Ventura County Psychologist License Defense Lawyer.

Ventura County Psychologist License and Criminal Convictions

The California Board of Psychology can discipline Psychologists for criminal convictions. California Board of Psychology discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Psychologist. Common criminal offenses that can cause Psychologist License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Board of Psychology and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Psychologists in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Psychologists engaged in Insurance Fraud, Unlawful Practice of Medicine and Unlawful Representation as a Physician. In serious criminal cases against Psychologists pending in Criminal Court, the California Board of Psychology and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Psychologist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Psychologist License in Criminal Court. Psychologists facing criminal charges and Psychologists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced Ventura County Psychologist License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Board of Psychology.

Ventura County Psychologist License Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Board of Psychology thoroughly investigates all applicants for Psychologist Licenses. The California Board of Psychology may deny a Ventura County Psychologist License to Psychologist students and Psychologists from other states and countries. Most Ventura County Psychologist License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Psychologist License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Psychologist License should contact a Ventura County Psychologist License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Board of Psychology Statement of Issues Hearing.

Ventura County Psychologist Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Psychologists who have received a Psychologist License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Psychologist License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Board of Psychology. A successful Psychologist License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced Ventura County Psychologist License Defense Attorney.

California Board of Psychology License Defense Lawyer in Los Angeles

The California Board of Psychology, known as the BOP, licenses approximately 18,000 Psychologists in the State of California. Most Los Angeles Psychologists have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Board of Psychology. For Psychologists who become part of the California Board of Psychology’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Psychologist License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Psychologists facing the California Board of Psychology disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced Los Angeles Psychologist License Defense Attorney.

California Board of Psychology Investigation Defense Lawyer in Los Angeles

The majority of California Board of Psychology investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Board of Psychology Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Board of Psychology utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Psychologists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Board of Psychology disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Board of Psychology investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Psychologist facing a California Board of Psychology investigation, contact a Los Angeles Psychologist License Defense Attorney for representation.

Los Angeles Psychologist License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a Los Angeles Psychologist serves as notice to a Psychologist that the Board intends to revoke the Psychologist License. The Psychologist, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Psychologist. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Psychologist License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Psychologist License in Los Angeles. In many cases, it is possible for Psychologists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Board of Psychology. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) in Los Angeles. Psychologists facing a California Board of Psychology Accusation should contact an experienced Los Angeles Psychologist License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Psychologists include:

Accepting or Paying Referral Fees Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Psychologist Activity Dishonest, Corrupt or Fraudulent Act Gross Negligence

Improper Advertising Practice Outside Fields of Competence Repeated Negligent Acts Sexual Misconduct to a Patient

Unprofessional Conduct Use of a Controlled Substance or Alcohol in a Dangerous Manner Violation of Confidentiality Violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct

Los Angeles Psychologist License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. One of these Court locations is located in Downtown Los Angeles. The OAH Los Angeles Office serves Los Angeles County, Inyo County, Kern County, Santa Barbara County and Ventura County. In addition, the Court venue for California Board of Psychology disciplinary matters occurring in portions of Orange County, Riverside County and San Bernardino County is the OAH Office in Los Angeles. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Board of Psychology can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Board of Psychology’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. Los Angeles Government Code § 11521 allows a Psychologist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to Los Angeles Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Psychologist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Los Angeles Psychologists facing a California Board of Psychology Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Los Angeles Psychologist License Defense Lawyer.

Los Angeles Psychologist License and Criminal Convictions

The California Board of Psychology can discipline Psychologists for criminal convictions. California Board of Psychology discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Psychologist. Common criminal offenses that can cause Psychologist License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Board of Psychology and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Psychologists in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Psychologists engaged in Insurance Fraud, Unlawful Practice of Medicine and Unlawful Representation as a Physician. In serious criminal cases against Psychologists pending in Criminal Court, the California Board of Psychology and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Psychologist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Psychologist License in Criminal Court. Psychologists facing criminal charges and Psychologists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced Los Angeles Psychologist License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Board of Psychology.

Los Angeles Psychologist License Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Board of Psychology thoroughly investigates all applicants for Psychologist Licenses. The California Board of Psychology may deny a Los Angeles Psychologist License to Psychologist students and Psychologists from other states and countries. Most Los Angeles Psychologist License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Psychologist License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Psychologist License should contact a Los Angeles Psychologist License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Board of Psychology Statement of Issues Hearing.

Los Angeles Psychologist Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Psychologists who have received a Psychologist License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Psychologist License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Board of Psychology. A successful Psychologist License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced Los Angeles Psychologist License Defense Attorney.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife License Defense Lawyer

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife, known as CDFW, licenses Hunters in the State of California. Most California Hunters have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of CDFW. For Hunters who become part of the CDFW’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Hunting License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Hunters facing the CDFW disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Hunting License Defense Attorney.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of CDFW investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, CDFW Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife employs sworn Peace Officers (Game Wardens) and non sworn Enforcement Representatives. These CDFW employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the CDFW disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a CDFW investigation, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife has several options. CDFW can choose to close the Complaint. CDFW can choose to issue a Citation. CDFW can also choose to refer the matter to the Department’s Legal Division. CDFW’s Legal Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, CDFW may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Hunters facing a CDFW investigation, contact a California CDFW License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Hunting License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Hunters serves as notice to a Hunters that CDFW intends to revoke the Hunters License. The Hunters, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Hunters. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Hunting License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Hunting License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Hunters to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Hunters facing a California Department of Fish and Wildlife Accusation should contact an experienced California Hunting License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Hunters include:

Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Hunters Excessive Hunting Failure to Submit Logs

Failure to Submit Records Filing False Information Firearms Violations Hunting Prohibited Animals

Illegal Hunting Poaching Violation of Hunting Regulations Weapons Violations

California Hunting License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Hunting to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Hunting can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Hunters facing a California Department of Fish and Wildlife Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Hunting License Defense Lawyer.

California Hunting License and Criminal Convictions

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife can discipline Hunters for criminal convictions. California Department of Fish and Wildlife discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Hunters. Common criminal offenses that can cause Hunters License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Hunters in the course and scope of their trade. Criminal investigations often involve Hunters engaged in Firearms Violations, Fish and Game Code Violations and Weapons Violations. In serious criminal cases against Hunters pending in Criminal Court, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Legal Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Hunting. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Hunting License in Criminal Court. Hunters facing criminal charges and Hunters who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Hunting License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

California Hunting License Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife thoroughly investigates all applicants for Hunting Licenses. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife may deny a California Hunting License for a variety of reasons. Most California Hunting License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Hunting License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Hunting License should contact a California Hunting License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Department of Fish and Wildlife Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Hunting License Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Hunters who have received a Hunters License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Hunting License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. A successful Hunting License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Hunting License Defense Attorney.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife License Defense Lawyer

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife, known as CDFW, licenses Fisherman in the State of California. Most California Fisherman have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of CDFW. For Fisherman who become part of the CDFW’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Fishing License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Fisherman facing the CDFW disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Fisherman License Defense Attorney.

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife issues the following types of Fishing Licenses:

• Commercial Fish Business License
• Commercial Fishing License
• Commercial Passenger Fishing Boat License
• Fish Importation Permit
• Lifetime Fishing License
• Scientific Collecting Permit
• Sport Fishing License

California Department of Fish and Wildlife Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of CDFW investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, CDFW Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife employs sworn Peace Officers (Game Wardens) and non sworn Enforcement Representatives. These CDFW employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the CDFW disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a CDFW investigation, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife has several options. CDFW can choose to close the Complaint. CDFW can choose to issue a Citation. CDFW can also choose to refer the matter to the Department’s Legal Division. CDFW’s Legal Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, CDFW may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Fisherman facing a CDFW investigation, contact a California CDFW License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Fisherman License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Fisherman serves as notice to a Fisherman that CDFW intends to revoke the Fisherman License. The Fisherman, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Fisherman. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Fishing License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Fishing License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Fisherman to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Fisherman facing a California Department of Fish and Wildlife Accusation should contact an experienced California Fishing License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Fisherman include:

Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Fisherman Excessive Fishing Failure to Submit Logs Failure to Submit Records

Filing False Information Fishing for Prohibited Fish Illegal Fishing Illegal Fishing in a Conservation Area

Over fishing Violation of Commercial Fishing Regulations Violation of Fishing Regulation

California Fishing License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Fishing to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Fishing can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Fisherman facing a California Department of Fish and Wildlife Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Fishing License Defense Lawyer.

California Fisherman License and Criminal Convictions

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife can discipline Fisherman for criminal convictions. California Department of Fish and Wildlife discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Fisherman. Common criminal offenses that can cause Fisherman License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Fisherman in the course and scope of their trade. Criminal investigations often involve Fisherman engaged in Filing False Reports, Fish and Game Code Violations and Perjury. In serious criminal cases against Fisherman pending in Criminal Court, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Legal Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Fishing. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Fishing License in Criminal Court. Fisherman facing criminal charges and Fisherman who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Fisherman License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

California Fishing License Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife thoroughly investigates all applicants for Fishing Licenses. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife may deny a California Fishing License for a variety of reasons. Most California Fishing License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Fishing License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Fishing License should contact a California Fishing License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Department of Fish and Wildlife Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Fishing License Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Fisherman who have received a Fisherman License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Fishing License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. A successful Fishing License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Fishing License Defense Attorney.

Medical Board of California Physician Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine Defense Attorney

The Medical Board of California, known as the MBC, vigorously investigates and disciplines Physicians accused of Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine. An allegation of Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine against Doctors in California can have profound consequences. Consequences can include Physician and Surgeon License revocation by the Medical Board of California, loss of hospital privileges and even criminal charges. California Business & Professions Code Section 2052 prohibits Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine. Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine is broadly defined. Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine includes, but is not limited to, the following acts:

• Allowing office staff to practice Medicine
• Practicing Medicine in California While Not Licensed in California
• Practicing Medicine in California While Suspended or Revoked
• Renting a Physician’s Medical License to a Nurse
• Renting a Physician’s Medical License to a Physician Assistant

Many Physicians accused of Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine work in Cosmetic Treatment Centers (Med-Spas) and Substance Abuse Treatment Centers. California Physicians facing Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine allegations should contact an experienced Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Medical Board of California Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Medical Board of California Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine Investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Medical Board of California Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Medical Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine investigations against Doctors. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine committed by Physicians against patients. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Physicians facing disciplinary action for Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine against a patient. At the conclusion of a Medical Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In patient Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are Physician facing a Medical Board of California Investigation for Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine against a patient, contact a California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Physician serves as notice to a Physician that the Medical Board of California intends to revoke the Physician License. A substantiated allegation of Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine against a patient by a Doctor almost always results in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Physician License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Doctors to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Medical Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Disciplinary Accusations involving Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine against a patient can result in revocation of a Physician and Surgeon License by the Medical Board of California. Doctors facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Hearing For Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Medical Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Medical Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Doctor to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physician can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Physicians facing a Medical Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

 California Doctor Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine Criminal Charges and Medical Board of California Discipline

The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine allegations that rise to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The Medical Board of California disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for certain criminal convictions. Medical Board of California Physician discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Physician. All Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine crimes involving patients are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Doctor.

The Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Physicians for Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine. In serious criminal cases against Doctors pending in Criminal Court, the Medical Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Physician. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Physician License in Criminal Court. Doctors facing criminal charges and Physicians who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Medical Board of California.

Medical Board of California Physician Substance Abuse Defense Attorney

The Medical Board of California, known as the MBC, vigorously investigates and disciplines Physicians with substance abuse problems, specifically alcohol and drugs. Allegations of alcohol and narcotics substance abuse against Physicians in California can have profound consequences. Consequences can include Physician and Surgeon License revocation by the Medical Board of California and loss of hospital privileges. California Business & Professions Code Sections 2238, 2239 and 2280 include the prohibition of the following acts involving Prescription Narcotics and Substance Abuses:

• Diverting Controlled Substances or Prescription Narcotic Pills
• Excessive Use of Controlled Substances
• Illegal Sales of Controlled Substances
• Practice Under the Influence of Narcotics
• Violation of Drug Statutes

Prescription Narcotics include, but are not limited to, the following:

Adderall Ambien Codeine Demerol Dilaudid

Fentanyl Hydrocodone Lortab Methadone Morphine

Norco Oxycodone OxyContin Suboxone Vicodin

Thus, even substance abuse related violations that do not result in criminal prosecution are grounds for disciplinary action against the Doctor by the Medical Board of California. California Physicians facing alcohol and narcotic substance abuse allegations should contact an experienced Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Medical Board of California Substance Abuse Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Medical Board of California Substance Abuse Investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Medical Board of California Substance Abuse Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Medical Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal Substance Abuse Investigations against Doctors. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to alcohol abuse and drug abuse committed by Physicians against patients. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Physicians facing disciplinary action for substance abuse violations related to alcohol and narcotics. At the conclusion of a Medical Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In substance abuse cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Physician facing a Medical Board of California Investigation for substance abuse violations, contact a California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Doctor License Substance Abuse Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Physician serves as notice to a Doctor that the Medical Board of California intends to revoke the Physician License. A criminal conviction for the following substance abuse criminal charges against a Doctor will result in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation:

• Altering a Prescription
• Diversion of Controlled Substances or Prescription Narcotic Pills
• Driving Under the Influence of Narcotics (DUI Narcotics)
• Forgery of a Prescription
• Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance
• Possession for Sale of Prescription Narcotic Pills
• Substance Abuse Fraud
• Public Intoxication Under the Influence of Narcotics
• Trafficking Substance Abuses

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Physician License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Doctors to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Medical Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Disciplinary Accusations involving substance abuse related to alcohol and narcotics can result in revocation of a Physician and Surgeon License by the Medical Board of California. Doctors facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Hearing For Substance Abuse

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Medical Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Medical Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Doctor to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physician can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Physicians facing a Medical Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Physician Substance Abuse Diversion of Narcotics Defense Attorney

The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for Substance Abuse allegations that rise to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The Medical Board of California disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for certain criminal convictions. Medical Board of California Physician discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Physician. All alcohol and drug related crimes are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Doctor.

The Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Physicians for Substance Abuse, including Diverting Narcotics. In serious criminal cases against Doctors pending in Criminal Court, the Medical Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Physician. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Physician License in Criminal Court. Doctors facing criminal charges and Physicians who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Medical Board of California.

SWRCB Enforcement Defense Lawyer

The California State Water Resources Control Board, known as SWRCB, enforces water quality regulations in the State of California. The California State Water Resources Control Board enforces regulations cross a variety of industries. Most California businesses have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California State Water Resources Control Board. The California State Water Resources Control Board oversees the following Regional Water Quality Control Boards:

• Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
• Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
• Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board
• Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board
• Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
• North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
• San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
• San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board
• Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board

The SWRCB and its affiliate agencies regulate the following water use categories:

Agricultural Irrigation Drinking Water Groundwater Hazardous Waste Hydro Electric Power

Marijuana (Cannabis) Municipal Water Supplies Oil Spills (Petroleum) Sanitation Storm Water Surface Water

Underground Storage Tanks Wastewater Treatment Water Conservation Water Rights Water Quality

For businesses that become part of the California State Water Resources Control Board disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The SWRCB enforcement disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Businesses facing the California State Water Resources Control Board disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California State Water Resources Control Board Enforcement Defense Attorney.

The California State Water Resources Control Board conducts enforcement against the following violations:

Acute Toxicity Class A + Class B Violations Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 Violations Clean Water Act Violations Environmental Violations

Illegal Dumping Industrial Stormwater Violations Farm Violations Food Processor Violations Operating Without a Valid Permit Recordkeeping Toxic Waste Violations

Unauthorized Discharge Unregulated Discharge Waste Discharge Water Pollution Water Treatment Violations Winery Violations

California State Water Resources Control Board Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California State Water Resources Control Board investigations begin with an enforcement operation. However, California State Water Resources Control Board Investigations also occur through consumer complaints and criminal investigations. The California State Water Resources Control Board utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct investigations. These employees investigate Administrative Law violations under the jurisdiction of SWRCB. SWRCB Investigators often work closely with the California Attorney General’s Office and local law enforcement. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California State Water Resources Control Board (or Regional Water Quality Control Board) disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California State Water Resources Control Board (or Regional Water Quality Control Board) investigation, the California State Water Resources Control Board has several options. The California State Water Resources Control Board (or Regional Water Quality Control Board) can choose to close the Investigation. The SWRCB can hold an informal conference to try to resolve the enforcement action. The California State Water Resources Control Board can choose to issue a Citation or Notice of Violation. SWRCB can also issue an Administrative Civil Liability (ACL) Complaint. In cases involving criminal conduct, the California State Water Resources Control Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office or Attorney General’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a business facing a California State Water Resources Control Board investigation, contact a California State Water Resources Control Board Investigation Defense Attorney for representation.

California SWRCB Citation and Enforcement Action Defense Attorney

It is not uncommon for out of state businesses that are involved in water based commerce in California to receive notice of SWRCB disciplinary enforcement action. Thus, SWRCB is not only limited to California companies. A SWRCB Administrative Civil Liability enforcement action contains numerous consequences. Maximum fines for violations are astronomical. In many instances, these fines can be reduced through negotiations with the California State Water Resources Control Board (or Regional Water Quality Control Board). If a violation cannot be settled, the violation can proceed to a Hearing before the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Businesses facing a California State Water Resources Control Board Enforcement Action should contact an experienced California State Water Resources Control Board Enforcement Action Defense Attorney for representation.

California State Water Resources Control Board Hearing Attorney

The Regional Water Quality Control Boards, conduct Hearings on Enforcement Actions. These Hearings may occur in Fresno, Los Angeles, Oakland, Riverside, Sacramento, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose San Luis Obispo and Santa Rosa. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing the Regional Water Quality Control Board or a Hearing Officer. The Hearing Officer or Hearing Panel will issue a written Proposed Decision. The Regional Water Quality Control Board can adopt, modify or reject the Proposed Decision. The Regional Water Quality Control Board action is called the Final Decision and Order.

There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a business to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the business can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California and out of state businesses facing California State Water Resources Control Board (or Regional Water Quality Control) Administrative Civil Liability need effective representation from a California State Water Resources Control Board Enforcement Action Defense Lawyer.

California State Water Resources Control Board and Criminal Investigations

The California State Water Resources Control Board often investigates criminal violations related to air quality regulations. SWRCB can refer matters for criminal prosecution to local District Attorney’s Offices and the California Attorney General’s Office. Many SWRCB Administrative Law violations are also criminal offenses. Businesses facing criminal investigation and criminal prosecution arising from a California State Water Resources Control Board Investigation need an experienced California State Water Resources Control Board Defense Attorney for representation.