Category: Uncategorized

California Fraternity and Sorority Risk Management Consultation Lawyer

The Greek Life system, comprised of fraternities and sororities, is well integrated in American collegiate society. Many colleges and universities in California regulate and discipline fraternities and sororities on campus. College fraternities and sororities are subject to disciplinary action for violations of the Student Code of Conduct and other rules and regulations. Consequences of university disciplinary proceedings for members of fraternities and sororities are profound. Risk Management is an important tool for college fraternities and sororities to prevent disciplinary violations. College fraternities and sororities in California should seek a consultation with a California Fraternity and Sorority Risk Management Consultation Attorney. The following violations are common reasons for college and university disciplinary Hearings against fraternities, sororities and their members:

Assault Battery Building Code Violations Cyber Bullying Cyber Sexual Bullying Date Rape Disorderly Conduct Drug Dealing Drug Use Fighting Hazing Hate Crimes Health Code Violations Intimidation

Municipal Code Violations Noise Complaints Obscene Behavior Off Campus Misconduct Partying Philanthropy Violations Poor Academic Performance Possession of a Firearm Possession of a Knife Prostitution Providing Alcohol to Minors/Underage students Public Intoxication

Racial Discrimination Rape Religious Discrimination Risk Management Violations Rush Rule Violations Sexual Assault Sexual Battery Sexual Harassment Threats Trespass Underage Consumption of Alcohol Unregistered Event With Alcohol Vandalism Weapons Possession

California Fraternity and Sorority Risk Management Lawyer

Each college and university in California that regulates Greek Life on campus maintains a disciplinary procedure for adjudicating violations of the Student Code and other university rules and regulations. For some fraternity and sorority disciplinary violations, college disciplinary action procedures may be governed by Title IX. The procedures between college campuses can differ slightly, but Administrative Law procedures across university campuses in California remain fairly constant. Similarly, Risk Management is a comprehensive area of law that applies to fraternities and sororities on all college and university campuses. It is important for fraternity and sorority groups to seek consultation from an experienced California College and University Risk Management Attorney. Risk Management presentation topics can include:

• Alcohol
• Discrimination (Ethnic Discrimination, Racial Discrimination and Religious Discrimination
• Drugs and Narcotics
• Hazing
• Sexual Assault
• Social Media
• Technology (cell phone, computer and video camera)

California Fraternity and Sorority Disciplinary Hearing Defense Attorney

As stated above, each college and university in California maintains slightly different disciplinary procedures for fraternity and sorority (Greek Life Organization) disciplinary Hearings. At some colleges, a student disciplinary review committee conducts the initial Hearing for fraternity and sorority violations. At other universities, a faculty disciplinary review committee conducts the first disciplinary Hearing for fraternity and sorority violations. Some colleges even maintain an independent judicial council to oversee fraternity and sorority disciplinary Hearings. Further Appeals may be heard by College/University Administrators or even by the College/University Board of Trustees. Fraternities, sororities and their members (often) have the right to be represented by an attorney at fraternity and sorority college/university disciplinary Hearings. Our firm represents fraternities and sorority members in disciplinary Hearings at the following California colleges and universities:

(University of California System) University of California, Berkeley University of California, Davis University of California, Irvine (UCI) University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) University of California, Merced University of California, Riverside (UCR) University of California, San Diego (UCSD) University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC) (California State University System) California Maritime Academy California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly San Luis Obispo) California State Polytechnic University (Cal Poly Pomona) California State University, Bakersfield California State University, Channel Islands

California State University, Chico California State University, Dominguez Hills California State University, East Bay California State University, Fresno (Fresno State) California State University, Fullerton California State University, Long Beach California State University, Los Angeles (CSULA) California State University, Monterey Bay California State University, Northridge (CSUN) California State University, Sacramento California State University, San Bernardino (CSUSB) California State University, San Marcos (CSUSM) California State University, Stanislaus Humboldt State University

San Diego State University (SDSU) San Francisco State University (SFSU) San Jose State University (SJSU) Sonoma State University (Private Colleges and Universities) Chapman University Fresno Pacific University Loyola Marymount University Mount Saint Mary’s University Notre Dame de Namur University Occidental College Pepperdine University Santa Clara University Scripps College Stanford University University of La Verne University of Redlands University of San Francisco (USF) University of San Diego University of Southern California (USC) University of the Pacific Whittier College Woodbury University

California Fraternity and Sorority Hazing Defense Attorney

Hazing remains the most controversial and covered topic in the media for college fraternity and sorority Risk Management policies. Despite national fraternity and sorority Greek Life Organizations promoting an anti Hazing agenda, Hazing allegations emerge every year on California college and university campuses. Hazing allegations can result in college Administrative Law disciplinary action, civil lawsuits and even criminal charges against fraternities, sororities and their members. When fraternity and sorority members are accused of Hazing, national fraternity and sorority organizations are ill equipped to advise their chapters and members. A California Fraternity and Sorority Hazing Defense Lawyer can provide assistance with Risk Management policies for California Fraternity and Sorority organizations.

California Fraternity and Sexual Assault Defense Attorney

Sexual Assault is a significant problem for fraternities, sororities and their members in California. Sexual Assault and related sexual misconduct allegations typically involve fraternities, but sorority members can be accused as well. Unfortunately on many college and university campuses, fraternity members accused of Sexual Assault are not provided basic Due Process Rights. A mentality of guilty no matter if you are innocent prevails on many college and university campuses with respect to Sexual Assault involving fraternities. National fraternity and sorority Greek Life Organizations are often afraid to dispute false allegations of Sexual Assault and sexual misconduct. A California Fraternity and Sorority Hazing Sexual Assault Defense Lawyer can provide assistance with Risk Management policies for California Fraternity and Sorority organizations.

California Fraternity and Sorority Criminal Investigations 

Public universities in California generally maintain campus police departments with full law enforcement authority. Private universities in California may or may not have campus police departments with full police powers. However, all colleges, universities and Greek Organizations in California maintain close working relationships with local law enforcement and the District Attorney’s Office. Colleges and universities in California do not hesitate to conduct referral criminal investigations to the appropriate police and prosecutorial agencies, particularly if the alleged criminal conduct involves fraternity members and sorority members. Fraternity and sorority members are often investigated for the following criminal offenses on college campuses in California:

Accessory to a Crime After the Fact Assault Attempted Murder arising from Hazing Battery Building Code Violations Burglary Criminal Threats Disturbing the Peace Drug Dealing DUI

Extortion Hate Crimes Hazing Involuntary Manslaughter arising from Hazing Murder arising from Hazing Municipal Code Violations Obstruction of Justice Possession of Drugs Possession of a Knife

Possession of a Firearm Prostitution Providing Alcohol to Minors Rape Sexual Assault Sexual Battery Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter Voluntary Manslaughter arising from Hazing

Criminal investigations and criminal charges can have a profound impact on an individual’s future. Fraternity brothers and sorority sisters are often the subject of criminal investigations at California colleges and universities. The criminal offenses listed above are serious and may have life long consequences. These consequences can include expulsion from a college/university, lost job opportunities, and significant jail time. California Fraternity and Sorority members facing college and university criminal investigations require an experienced California Fraternity and Sorority Sorority Risk Management Attorney for representation.

California Administrative Law Attorney for Unlicensed Activity and Unlicensed Practice in California

Our firm practices California Administrative Law. Administrative Law in California is also known as Professional License Defense. Professional License Defense encompasses Business License Defense, Financial License Defense and Medical License Defense. Operating without a license, when a license is required, is a criminal offense. Operating without a license is also known as Unlicensed Activity, is a criminal offense. The following are common examples of Unlicensed Activity in California that constitutes a criminal offense:

Contracting Without a License Land Surveying Without a License Selling Alcohol Without a License Unlawful Representation as a Physician Unlicensed Automotive Repair Dealer Unlicensed Day Care Unlicensed Family Child Care Home Unlicensed Practice of Accounting Unlicensed Practice of Acupuncture

Unlicensed Practice of Architecture Unlicensed Practice of Chiropractic Medicine Unlicensed Practice of Dentistry Unlicensed Practice of Engineering Unlicensed Practice of Insurance Unlicensed Practice of Medicine Unlicensed Practice of Nursing Unlicensed Practice of Occupational Therapy Unlicensed Practice of Optometry Unlicensed Practice of Pharmacy

Unlicensed Practice of Physical Therapy Unlicensed Practice of Podiatry Unlicensed Practice of Psychology Unlicensed Practice of Real estate Unlicensed Practice of Veterinary Medicine Unlicensed Preschool Unlicensed Private Postsecondary Educational Institution Unlicensed Transaction of Bail Bonds Unregistered Home Improvement Salesperson

California Administrative Law Lawyer

The majority of California Unlicensed Activity criminal investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, criminal investigations for Unlicensed Activity also occur through sting operations and criminal investigations. Investigations for Unlicensed Practice can result in either Administrative Law discipline, or criminal charges.

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. OAH is the Court venue for Administrative Law disciplinary actions. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. The California Attorney General’s Office acts as the attorney for most licensing boards in California.

The venue for criminal charges related to Unlicensed Activity is the Superior Court of California. Each County maintains a Superior Court of California. Depending on the nature of the criminal charges, the prosecuting agency may be a City Attorney’s Office, or a County District Attorney’s Office. Individuals and businesses facing an Investigation for Unlicensed Activity or Unlicensed Practice should contact a California Administrative Law Attorney for representation.

Medical Board of California Doctor Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol Defense Attorney

The Medical Board of California, known as the MBC, vigorously investigates and disciplines Physicians accused of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol. An allegation of DUI involving alcohol, narcotics, or prescription drugs against Physicians in California can have profound consequences. Consequences can include Physician and Surgeon License revocation by the Medical Board of California and loss of hospital privileges. California Business & Professions Code Sections 2238, 2239 and 2280 include the prohibition of the following acts involving alcohol, narcotics and prescription pills:

• Excessive Use of Alcohol
• Excessive Use of Controlled Substances
• Illegal Sales of Controlled Substances
• Practice Under the Influence of Alcohol
• Practice Under the Influence of Narcotics
• Violation of Drug Statutes

Controlled Substances and Narcotics include, but are not limited to, the following:

Alcohol Butane Honey Oil Cocaine Ecstasy

Hash Heroin LSD Marijuana

Methamphetamine PCP Prescription Narcotics Steroids

Prescription Narcotics include, but are not limited to, the following:

Adderall Ambien Codeine Demerol Dilaudid

Fentanyl Hydrocodone Lortab Methadone Morphine

Norco Oxycodone OxyContin Suboxone Vicodin

Thus, even alcohol and drug related violations that do not result in criminal prosecution are grounds for disciplinary action against the Physician by the Medical Board of California. California Doctors facing alcohol or drug abuse allegations should contact an experienced Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Medical Board of California DUI Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Medical Board of California Driving Under the Influence, or DUI, Investigations begin with the filing of a criminal conviction. However, Medical Board of California alcohol and drug Investigations also occur through sting operations, consumer complaints and criminal investigations. The Medical Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal DUI Investigations involving alcohol or drugs against Doctors. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to DUI involving alcohol or drugs committed by Physicians. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Physicians facing disciplinary action for substance abuse violations related to Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol. At the conclusion of a Medical Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In substance abuse cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Physician facing a Medical Board of California Investigation for alcohol or drug substance abuse violations, contact a California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

When a Medical Board of California Investigation occurs due to a criminal conviction, the Medical Board of California assigns the matter to an Investigator. A Medical Board of California Investigator will contact the Physician to conduct either an in person interview, or obtain a written statement. The Medical Board of California will also conduct a review of the police and Court records. Discipline may vary according to whether or not the following factors were present (not an all inclusive list):

• Child Endangerment
• Exhibition of Speed
• Excessive Blood Alcohol Content (BAC)
• Felony DUI
• Hit & Run
• Misdemeanor first offense DUI
• Misdemeanor second offense DUI
• Misdemeanor third offense DUI
• Dry Reckless
• Wet Reckless

If you are a Doctor facing a Medical Board of California Investigation for DUI, alcohol, or drug related offenses, contact a California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Physician serves as notice to a Physician that the Medical Board of California intends to revoke the Physician License. A substantiated allegation of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol, or DUI, by a Doctor almost always results in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Physician License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Doctors to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Medical Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Disciplinary Accusations involving DUI or substance abuse can result in revocation of a Physician and Surgeon License by the Medical Board of California. Doctors facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Hearing For DUI Conviction

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Medical Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Medical Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Doctor to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physician can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Physicians facing a Medical Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Physician DUI Criminal Charges and Medical Board of California Discipline

The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for substance abuse that rises to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The Medical Board of California disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for certain criminal convictions. Medical Board of California Physician discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Physician. All alcohol and drug related DUI crimes are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Doctor.

The Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Physicians for substance abuse. In serious criminal cases against Doctors pending in Criminal Court, the Medical Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Physician. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Physician License in Criminal Court. Doctors facing criminal charges and Physicians who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Medical Board of California.

California Veterinary Medical Board License Defense Lawyer

The California Veterinary Medical Board, known as the VMB, licenses approximately 17,000 Veterinarians in the State of California. Most California Veterinarians have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Veterinary Medical Board. For Veterinarians who become part of the California Veterinary Medical Board disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Veterinarian License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Veterinarians facing the California Veterinary Medical Board disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Veterinary Medical Board License Defense Attorney.

California Veterinary Medical Board Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Veterinary Medical Board investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Veterinary Medical Board Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Veterinary Medical Board utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Veterinarians. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Veterinary Medical Board disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Veterinary Medical Board investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Veterinarian facing a California Veterinary Medical Board investigation, contact a California Veterinary Medical Board License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Veterinary Medical Board Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Veterinarian serves as notice to a Veterinarian that the Board intends to revoke the Veterinarian License. The Veterinarian, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Veterinarian. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Veterinarian License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Veterinarian License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Veterinarians to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Veterinary Medical Board. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Veterinarians facing a California Veterinary Medical Board Accusation should contact an experienced California Veterinary Medical Board License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Veterinarians include:

Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Veterinarian Activity Cruelty to Animals Failure to Keep Premises Clean and Sanitary Failure to Maintain Adequate Records

Failure to Maintain Confidentiality Failure to Report Animal Abuse or Cruelty False Advertising Fraud or Deception

Fraud or Dishonesty Incompetence Negligence Overprescribing Unprofessional Conduct

California Veterinary Medical Board Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Veterinary Medical Board can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Veterinary Medical Board’ action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Veterinarian to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Veterinarian can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Veterinarians facing a California Veterinary Medical Board Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Veterinary Medical Board License Defense Lawyer.

California Veterinary Medical Board License and Criminal Convictions

The California Veterinary Medical Board can discipline Veterinarians for criminal convictions. California Veterinary Medical Board discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Veterinarian. Common criminal offenses that can cause Veterinarian License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Veterinary Medical Board and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Veterinarians in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Veterinarians engaged in Insurance Fraud and Prescription Pill Fraud. In serious criminal cases against Veterinarians pending in Criminal Court, the California Veterinary Medical Board and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Veterinarian. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Veterinarian License in Criminal Court.

Veterinarians facing criminal charges and Veterinarians who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Veterinarian License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Veterinary Medical Board.

California Veterinary Medical Board Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Veterinary Medical Board thoroughly investigates all applicants for Veterinarian Licenses. The California Veterinary Medical Board may deny a California Veterinarian License to Veterinarian students and Veterinarians from other states and countries. Most California Veterinarian License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Veterinarian License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Veterinarian License should contact a California Veterinary Medical Board License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Veterinary Medical Board Statement of Issues Hearing.

California Veterinary Medical Board Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Veterinarians who have received a Veterinarian License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Veterinarian License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Veterinary Medical Board. A successful Veterinarian License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Veterinary Medical Board License Defense Attorney.

Dental Hygiene Committee of California License Defense Lawyer

The Dental Hygiene Committee of California, known as the DHCC, licenses approximately 20,000 Dental Hygienists in the State of California. Most California Dental Hygienists have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the Dental Hygiene Committee of California. For Dental Hygienists who become part of the Dental Hygiene Committee of California disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Dental Hygienist License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Dental Hygienists facing the Dental Hygiene Committee of California disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced Dental Hygiene Committee of California License Defense Attorney.

Dental Hygiene Committee of California Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Dental Hygiene Committee of California investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Dental Hygiene Committee of California Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Dental Hygiene Committee of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Dental Hygienists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the Dental Hygiene Committee of California disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a Dental Hygiene Committee of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Dental Hygienist facing a Dental Hygiene Committee of California investigation, contact a Dental Hygiene Committee of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Dental Hygiene Committee of California Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Dental Hygienist serves as notice to a Dental Hygienist that the Board intends to revoke the Dental Hygienist License. The Dental Hygienist, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Dental Hygienist. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Dental Hygienist License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Dental Hygienist License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Dental Hygienists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Dental Hygiene Committee of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Dental Hygienists facing a Dental Hygiene Committee of California Accusation should contact an experienced Dental Hygiene Committee of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Dental Hygiene Committee of California Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Dental Hygiene Committee of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Dental Hygiene Committee of California’ action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Dental Hygienist to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Dental Hygienist can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Dental Hygienists facing a Dental Hygiene Committee of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Dental Hygiene Committee of California License Defense Lawyer.

Dental Hygiene Committee of California License and Criminal Convictions

The Dental Hygiene Committee of California can discipline Dental Hygienists for criminal convictions. Dental Hygiene Committee of California discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Dental Hygienist. Common criminal offenses that can cause Dental Hygienist License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The Dental Hygiene Committee of California and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Dental Hygienists in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Dental Hygienists engaged in Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance, Prescription Pill Fraud and Unlicensed Practice of Dentistry (Practicing Dentistry Without a License). In serious criminal cases against Dental Hygienists pending in Criminal Court, the Dental Hygiene Committee of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Dental Hygienist. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Dental Hygienist License in Criminal Court.

Dental Hygienists facing criminal charges and Dental Hygienists who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Dental Hygienist License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Dental Hygiene Committee of California.

Dental Hygiene Committee of California Statement of Issues Attorney

The Dental Hygiene Committee of California thoroughly investigates all applicants for Dental Hygienist Licenses. The Dental Hygiene Committee of California may deny a California Dental Hygienist License to Dental Hygienist students and Dental Hygienists from other states and countries. Most California Dental Hygienist License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Dental Hygienist License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Dental Hygienist License should contact a Dental Hygiene Committee of California License Denial Lawyer for representation in a Dental Hygiene Committee of California Statement of Issues Hearing.

Dental Hygiene Committee of California Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Dental Hygienists who have received a Dental Hygienist License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Dental Hygienist License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the Dental Hygiene Committee of California. A successful Dental Hygienist License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced Dental Hygiene Committee of California License Defense Attorney.

California Physician-Gynecologist License Defense Lawyer

The Medical Board of California, known as the MBC, licenses approximately 120,000 Physicians in the State of California. The Medical Board of California does not license subspecialties of Physicians. Nearly all Medical Physicians in California maintain Board Certification through the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). ABMS Member Boards are private Self Regulatory Organizations and thus are not subject to regulation by the Medical Board of California. However, ABMS Member Boards often cooperate with the Medical Board of California in disciplinary matters. California Gynecologists who are Board Certified can face unique disciplinary issues with the Medical Board of California. The Doctor License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Gynecologists facing the Medical Board of California disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Physician-Gynecologist License Defense Attorney.

California Doctors-Gynecologists and Medical Board of California Discipline

Gynecologists can face Complaints that result in a Medical Board of California Investigation. These Medical Board of California Investigations may result in Medical Board of California disciplinary action in the form of an Accusation. An Accusation often results in Physician License discipline, which also has a negative impact on the reputation of a Gynecologist. A Doctor-Gynecologist facing a Medical Board of California disciplinary action requires an experienced California Physician-Gynecologist License Defense Lawyer for representation. Gynecologists in California have been accused of the following violations:

• Gross Negligence in the Practice of Gynecology
• Insurance Fraud involving false medical billing and false medical claims
• Overprescribing Narcotics, specifically pain management opiates medication, such as Codeine, Hydrocodone, Oxycodone, Oxycontin and Xanax
• Performing Treatment Below the Standard of Care
• Prescribing Narcotics, specifically prescription pills, without a proper medical examination
• Sexual Misconduct With a Patient

Medical Board of California Investigation Defense Lawyer for Gynecologists

The majority of Medical Board of California investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Medical Board of California Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Medical Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Gynecologists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the Medical Board of California disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a Medical Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Gynecologist facing a Medical Board of California investigation, contact a California Doctor-Gynecologist License Defense Attorney for representation.

Medical Board of California Accusation Defense Attorney for Gynecologists

A formal Accusation served on a California Physician serves as notice to a Physician that the Board intends to revoke the Physician License. The Physician, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Physician. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Physician License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Physician License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Gynecologists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Medical Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Doctors facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation. Physicians facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Doctor-Gynecologist License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Gynecologists include:

Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Practice of Medicine Altering Medical Records Dishonesty Related to Patient Care Excessive Prescribing of Narcotics Excessive Treatments Excessive Use of Alcohol

Excessive Use of Controlled Substances Failure to Maintain Adequate Records Gross Negligence Incompetence Misleading Advertising Practicing Under the Influence of Alcohol

Practicing Under the Influence of Narcotics Prescribing to Addicts Prescribing Without Appropriate Examination Repeated Negligent Acts Sexual Misconduct Unprofessional Conduct

Medical Board of California Hearing Attorney for Gynecologists

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Medical Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Medical Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Doctor to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physician can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Physicians-Gynecologists facing a Medical Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Physician-Gynecologist Medical License and Criminal Convictions

The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for criminal convictions. Medical Board of California discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Physician. The Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Doctors in the course and scope of their practice. Common criminal offenses that can cause Physician License discipline for Gynecologists are:

• Diverting a Controlled Substance
• Domestic Violence
• DUI
• Insurance Fraud
• Medi-Cal Fraud
• Medicare Fraud
• Prescription Pill Fraud (Pill Mill)
• Sex Offenses
• Workers Compensation Fraud

In serious criminal cases against Physicians pending in Criminal Court, the Medical Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Physician. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Physician License in Criminal Court. Physicians facing criminal charges and Doctors who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Physician-Gynecologist License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Medical Board of California.

California Physician-Psychiatrist License Defense Lawyer

The Medical Board of California, known as the MBC, licenses approximately 120,000 Physicians in the State of California. The Medical Board of California does not license subspecialties of Physicians. Nearly all Medical Physicians in California maintain Board Certification through the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). ABMS Member Boards are private Self Regulatory Organizations and thus are not subject to regulation by the Medical Board of California. However, ABMS Member Boards often cooperate with the Medical Board of California in disciplinary matters. California Psychiatrists who are Board Certified can face unique disciplinary issues with the Medical Board of California. The Doctor License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Psychiatrists facing the Medical Board of California disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Physician-Psychiatrist License Defense Attorney.

California Doctors-Psychiatrists and Medical Board of California Discipline

Psychiatrists can face Complaints that result in a Medical Board of California Investigation. These Medical Board of California Investigations may result in Medical Board of California disciplinary action in the form of an Accusation. An Accusation often results in Physician License discipline, which also has a negative impact on the reputation of a Psychiatrist. A Doctor-Psychiatrist facing a Medical Board of California disciplinary action requires an experienced California Physician-Psychiatrist License Defense Lawyer for representation. Psychiatrists in California have been accused of the following violations:

• Gross Negligence in the Practice of Psychiatry
• Insurance Fraud involving false medical billing and false medical claims
• Overprescribing Psychiatric Drugs, specifically Adderall, Ambien, Ativan, Lexapro, Prozac, Xanax, Valium, Wellbutrin and Zoloft
• Performing Treatment Below the Standard of Care
• Prescribing Psychiatric Drugs, without a proper medical examination

Medical Board of California Investigation Defense Lawyer for Psychiatrists

The majority of Medical Board of California investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Medical Board of California Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Medical Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Psychiatrists. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the Medical Board of California disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a Medical Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Psychiatrist facing a Medical Board of California investigation, contact a California Doctor-Psychiatrist License Defense Attorney for representation.

Medical Board of California Accusation Defense Attorney for Psychiatrists

A formal Accusation served on a California Physician serves as notice to a Physician that the Board intends to revoke the Physician License. The Physician, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Physician. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Physician License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Physician License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Psychiatrists to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Medical Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Doctors facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation. Physicians facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Doctor-Psychiatrist License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Psychiatrists include:

Aiding and Abetting Unlicensed Practice of Medicine Altering Medical Records Dishonesty Related to Patient Care Excessive Prescribing of Narcotics Excessive Treatments Excessive Use of Alcohol

Excessive Use of Controlled Substances Failure to Maintain Adequate Records Gross Negligence Incompetence Misleading Advertising Practicing Under the Influence of Alcohol

Practicing Under the Influence of Narcotics Prescribing to Addicts Prescribing Without Appropriate Examination Repeated Negligent Acts Sexual Misconduct Unprofessional Conduct

Medical Board of California Hearing Attorney for Psychiatrists

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Medical Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Medical Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Doctor to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physician can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Physicians-Psychiatrists facing a Medical Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Physician-Psychiatrist Medical License and Criminal Convictions

The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for criminal convictions. Medical Board of California discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Physician. The Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Doctors in the course and scope of their practice. Common criminal offenses that can cause Physician License discipline for Psychiatrists are:

• Diverting a Controlled Substance
• Domestic Violence
• DUI
• Insurance Fraud
• Medi-Cal Fraud
• Medicare Fraud
• Prescription Pill Fraud (Pill Mill)
• Sex Offenses
• Workers Compensation Fraud

In serious criminal cases against Physicians pending in Criminal Court, the Medical Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Physician. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Physician License in Criminal Court. Physicians facing criminal charges and Doctors who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Physician-Psychiatrist License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Medical Board of California.

CDFA License Defense Lawyer

The California Department Food and Agriculture, known as the CDFA, issues and regulates numerous licenses in the State of California. Most CDFA licensees have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Department Food and Agriculture. For Licensees who become part of the California Department Food and Agriculture disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The CDFA License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Licensees facing the California Department Food and Agriculture disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Department Food and Agriculture License Defense Attorney.

The California Department Food and Agriculture issues the following types of licenses and permits:

40 Mile Cattle Special Transportation Permit 50 Mile Cattle Out of State Pasture Permit Broker License Butter Graders License Cash Buyer License Cattle Pasture to Pasture Permit Collection Center License Commercial Blood Bank Registration Commission Merchant License Custom Exempt Plant Registration Custom Livestock Slaughter License Dairy Farm License Dairy Plant License Dead Animal Haulers License

Dealer License Diabetic/Diatetic License Frozen Milk Products Plant License Inedible Kitchen Grease Renderer License Inedible Kitchen Grease Transporter Registration Inedible Materials Transporters License Inedible Permit Insect Permit Interstate Entry Permit Livestock Brand Registration Livestock Meat Inspector License Meat Processing Plant License Milk Distributor License Milk Handler License Milk Products Plant License

Mobil Slaughterer Registration Noxious Weeds Permit Oleomargarine License Pasteurizer’s License Pet Food License Plant Pests Permit Plant Quarantine Commodities Permit Poultry Meat Inspector license Processing Inspector License Processor License Registered Cattle Feedlot License Registered Dairy Inspector License Samplers and Weighers License Seed Sweet Potato Import Permit Technician’s License Tester’s License Vitamin and Minerals Permit

California Department Food and Agriculture Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Department Food and Agriculture investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Department Food and Agriculture Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Department Food and Agriculture utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department Food and Agriculture employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Licensees. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Department Food and Agriculture disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Department Food and Agriculture investigation, the Department has several options. The Department can choose to close the Complaint. The Department can choose to issue a Citation. The Department can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The California Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Department may refer the case to the local District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a licensee facing a California Department Food and Agriculture investigation, contact a California Department Food and Agriculture License Defense Attorney for representation.

CDFA Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California CDFA licensee serves as notice to a licensee that the Department intends to revoke the license. The licensee, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the licensee. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the license.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a CDFA License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Licensees to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the California Attorney General’s Office and the California Department Food and Agriculture. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Licensees facing a California Department Food and Agriculture Accusation should contact an experienced California Department Food and Agriculture License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Department Food and Agriculture Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Department Food and Agriculture can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Department Food and Agriculture action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a licensee to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the licensee can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Licensees facing a California Department Food and Agriculture Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Department Food and Agriculture License Defense Lawyer.

California Department Food and Agriculture License and Criminal Convictions

The California Department Food and Agriculture can discipline licensees for criminal convictions. California Department Food and Agriculture discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a licensee. Common criminal offenses that can cause CDFA License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Department Food and Agriculture and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Licensees in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Licensees engaged in Violations of the California Food & Agriculture Code. In serious criminal cases against Licensees pending in Criminal Court, the California Department Food and Agriculture and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the licensee. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a CDFA License in Criminal Court.

Licensees facing criminal charges and Licensees who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Department Food and Agriculture License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Department Food and Agriculture.

CDFA Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Department Food and Agriculture thoroughly investigates all applicants for CDFA Licenses. Most California Department Food and Agriculture denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the license application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a CDFA License should contact a California Department Food and Agriculture License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Department Food and Agriculture Statement of Issues Hearing.

CDFW License Defense Lawyer

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife, known as the CDFW, issues and regulates numerous licenses in the State of California. The primary licenses issued by CDFW are Fishing Licenses and Hunting Licenses. Most CDFW licensees have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. For Licensees who become part of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The CDFW License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Licensees facing the California Department of Fish and Wildlife disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Department of Fish and Wildlife License Defense Attorney.

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife issues the following types of licenses and permits:

Aquaculture Registration Biological Supply House Permit CDFW Lands Pass CESA Incidental Take Permit Commercial Fishing License Commercial Hunting Club License (Dead) Dreissenid Mussel Permit Domesticated Game Breeder License Falconry License Fallow Deer Farming Permit Fish Business License Fish Exchange Permit

Fish Importers License Fish Receivers License Fish Processors License Fish Wholesalers License Fisheries Branch Research Fisherman’s Retail Permit Fishing License Game Bird Club License Guide License (Hunting or Fishing) Hunting License Indian Game Transportation Tag Lifetime Fishing License

Lifetime Hunting License Native Reptile Captive Propagation Breeding Permit Oil Spill Cleanup Agent License Plant Collecting Permit Restricted Species Permit Salmon Vessel Permit Scientific Collecting Permit Southern Rock Crab Trap Permit Trapping License Tug Escort License Vessel Restricted Access Permit

California Department of Fish and Wildlife Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Department of Fish and Wildlife investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Department of Fish and Wildlife Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators (Game Wardens) to conduct criminal investigations against Licensees. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Department of Fish and Wildlife disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Department of Fish and Wildlife investigation, the Department has several options. The Department can choose to close the Complaint. The Department can choose to issue a Citation. The Department can also choose to refer the matter to the CDFW Legal Office. The CDFW Legal Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Department may refer the case to the local District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a licensee facing a California Department of Fish and Wildlife investigation, contact a California Department of Fish and Wildlife License Defense Attorney for representation.

CDFW Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California CDFW licensee serves as notice to a licensee that the Department intends to revoke the license. The licensee, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the licensee. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the license.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a CDFW License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Licensees to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Licensees facing a California Department of Fish and Wildlife Accusation should contact an experienced California Department of Fish and Wildlife License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a licensee to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the licensee can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Licensees facing a California Department of Fish and Wildlife Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Department of Fish and Wildlife License Defense Lawyer.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife License and Criminal Convictions

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife can discipline licensees for criminal convictions. California Department of Fish and Wildlife discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a licensee. Common criminal offenses that can cause CDFW License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Licensees in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Licensees engaged in Violations of the California Fish & Game Code. In serious criminal cases against Licensees pending in Criminal Court, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the CDFW’s Legal Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the licensee. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a CDFW License in Criminal Court.

Licensees facing criminal charges and Licensees who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Department of Fish and Wildlife License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

CDFW Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife thoroughly investigates all applicants for CDFW Licenses. Most California Department of Fish and Wildlife denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the license application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a CDFW License should contact a California Department of Fish and Wildlife License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Department of Fish and Wildlife Statement of Issues Hearing.

LAPD Board of Rights Police Officer Defense Lawyer

The Los Angeles Police Department maintains a disciplinary process for sworn police officers accused of misconduct. The LAPD Board of Rights conducts disciplinary Hearings for police officers facing termination, or suspension for longer than 22 days. The LAPD Board of Rights is part of the California Administrative Law process. Los Angeles City Charter Section 1070 governs LAPD Officer disciplinary proceedings. For Los Angeles Police Officers facing disciplinary action, the consequences are profound. The LAPD Board of Rights disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. LAPD Officers facing a Los Angeles Board of Rights Hearing should seek legal representation from an experienced Los Angeles Board of Rights Police Officer Defense Attorney.

Los Angeles Police Department Board of Rights Disciplinary Defense Attorney

The Los Angeles Police Department’s disciplinary process begins with an Internal Affairs Investigation. Most Internal Affairs Investigations arise from civilian Complaints. However, LAPD disciplinary actions also occur through Internal Affairs sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. It is important to have an attorney that understands the Los Angeles Police Department’s internal disciplinary process for sworn LAPD police officers accused of misconduct. At the conclusion of a Los Angeles Police Department internal investigation, the LAPD Administration has several options. The LAPD can close the Complaint. The LAPD can issue disciplinary action involving a demotion or suspension of 22 days or less without a Board of Rights Hearing. In this situation, a Los Angeles Police Officer can Appeal and request an LAPD Board of Rights Hearing. If the LAPD requests a demotion or suspension of longer than 22 days, or requests the termination of the accused Los Angeles Police Officer, the LAPD automatically holds a Los Angeles Police Department Board of Rights Hearing.

Common causes for disciplinary action against Los Angeles Police Officers include:

Absconding From Duty Aiding and Abetting Criminal Activity Assault Under Color of Authority Biased Policing Conduct Detrimental to the LAPD Conduct Unbecoming of a Police Officer Consorting With Known Criminals/Felons Criminal Activity Criminal Convictions Dereliction of Duty Domestic Violence Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (DUI) Failure to Investigate

Failure to Respond to Emergency 911 Call Filing a False Police Report Firearms Violations Gender Discrimination Insubordination Intimidation Perjury Racial Discrimination Religious Discrimination Retaliation Sexual Assault Under Color of Authority Sexual Harassment Sexual Orientation Discrimination Tardiness Theft

Unauthorized Computer or Records Access Unauthorized Use of Computer or Records Unlawful Arrest or Detention Unlawful Search or Seizure Unlawful Use of Alcohol Unlawful Use of Narcotics Unlawful Use of Force Unlawful Use of Tobacco Products Unlawful Use of a Weapon Vandalism Violation of a Restraining Order Violation of Pursuit Policy Violating the LAPD Manual Violating the LAPD Code of Ethics Weapons Violations

LAPD Board of Rights Hearing Defense Attorney

Los Angeles Police Department Board of Rights Hearings are conducted in accordance with Administrative Law policies and procedures. The application of Administrative Law greatly differs from Criminal Law. Hearsay evidence is admissible in Administrative Law proceedings. The burden of proof is much lower than in Criminal Court. The California Rules of Evidence are more relaxed in LAPD Board of Rights Hearings.

LAPD Officers facing a formal Department disciplinary Complaint have only a short window of time to request an LAPD Board of Rights Hearing. The failure to timely file an application for Hearing can result in a Default and additional disciplinary violations. A Panel of three individuals preside over an LAPD Board of Rights Hearing. Two of the individuals are Los Angeles Police Department Officers holding the rank of Captain or above. The third individual on the Board of Rights Panel is a civilian member of the community. However, please note that the system may change in the future for all three presiding individuals to be civilians.

At the LAPD Board of Rights Hearing, the Los Angeles Police Department is represented by an Advocate. The accused Police Officer has the right to have an advocate as well. The advocate can be a union representative, another Police Officer, or an attorney. At the Board of Rights Hearing, both sides have the opportunity to question witnesses and present evidence. The LAPD Board of Rights decides whether the accused Police Officer is guilty or not guilty of each Administrative violation. If the Police Officer is found guilty of an Administrative violation, then the LAPD Board of Rights will decide the appropriate discipline, taking into consideration the recommendation of the Los Angeles Police Chief. The LAPD Board of Rights makes it decision in writing. The Los Angeles Police Chief has the right to impose the discipline recommended by the LAPD Board of Rights, or impose lesser discipline on the accused Los Angeles Police Officer.

Los Angeles Police Department Board of Rights Appeal Lawyer

The Los Angeles Police Department maintains the Board of Rights to conduct LAPD Police Officer disciplinary Hearings. The LAPD Board of Rights is the only avenue of Administrative Appeal for an LAPD disciplinary matter. Once the Los Angeles Chief of Police imposes either the recommended discipline, or lesser discipline, the LAPD disciplinary matter concludes. Further Appeals can be made via an Administrative Writ of Mandamus to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Los Angeles Police Officers disciplined via an LAPD Board of Rights disciplinary Hearing should contact a Los Angeles Police Department Board of Rights Appeal Attorney for representation.

LAPD Board of Rights and Criminal Investigations

The Los Angeles Police Department can discipline or terminate Police Officers for criminal activity and criminal convictions. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Los Angeles Police Department may refer the case to the City Attorney’s Office or the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. Common criminal offenses that can cause an LAPD officer to be suspended or terminated are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

Los Angeles Police Department Criminal Investigations against LAPD Officers often involve LAPD Officers engaged in Assault Under Color of Authority and Sexual Assault. Los Angeles Police Officers facing the LAPD disciplinary process and/or criminal charges need an experienced Los Angeles Board of Rights Defense Attorney for representation in LAPD disciplinary proceedings.