Author: Professional License Defense Attorney

Medical Board of California Doctor Medicare Fraud Defense Attorney

The Medical Board of California, known as the MBC, vigorously investigates and disciplines Physicians accused of participating in Medicare Fraud. California law enforcement agencies heavily prosecute Doctors engaging in Medicare Fraud. There are several common methods by which Physicians participate in Medicare Fraud schemes. Physicians often establish clinics known as Claim Mills, or Medical Mills. Doctors at these Claim Mills and Medical Mills often commit the following violations:

• Billing Medicare for services not rendered
• Excessive Treatments
• False Medical Claims
• Gross Negligence in the Practice of Medicine
• Overbilling Medicare for services rendered
• Kickbacks to insurers, medical suppliers, and Pharmacists
• Prescribing unnecessary pain management narcotics medication (Pill Mill)

Medicare Insurance Fraud aided and abetted by Doctors remains a top enforcement priority for the Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies. False and fraudulent billing for services allegedly rendered, as well as kickback schemes, are an investigative priority for law enforcement. The Medical Board of California also targets Physicians at Claim Mills and Medical Mills who prescribe unnecessary painkiller narcotics medications. Put another way, the Medical Board of California targets Physicians running Pill Mills that double as Medicare Claim Mills and Medicare Medical Mills.

Consequences of Medicare Insurance Fraud for Doctors can include Physician and Surgeon License revocation by the Medical Board of California, loss of hospital privileges and even criminal charges. California Physicians facing allegations related to Medicare Fraud should contact an experienced Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Medical Board of California Medicare Fraud Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Medical Board of California Medicare Insurance Fraud Investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Medical Board of California Medicare Fraud Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Medical Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal Medicare Fraud Investigations against Doctors. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to Medicare Fraud committed by Physicians. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Physicians facing disciplinary action for Medicare Fraud. At the conclusion of a Medical Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. The Board may also refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Physician facing a Medical Board of California Investigation for Medicare Insurance Fraud, contact a California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Medicare Fraud Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Physician serves as notice to a Physician that the Medical Board of California intends to revoke the Physician License. A substantiated allegation of Medicare Insurance Fraud by a Doctor almost always results in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Physician License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Doctors to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Medical Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Disciplinary Accusations involving Medicare Fraud can result in revocation of a Physician and Surgeon License by the Medical Board of California. Doctors facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Hearing For Medicare Fraud

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Medical Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Medical Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Doctor to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physician can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Physicians facing a Medical Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Physician Medicare Fraud Criminal Charges and Medical Board of California Discipline

The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for Medicare Fraud that rises to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The Medical Board of California disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for certain criminal convictions. Medical Board of California Physician discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Physician. All Medicare Fraud crimes are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Doctor.

The Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Physicians for Medicare Fraud. In serious criminal cases against Doctors pending in Criminal Court, the Medical Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Physician. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Physician License in Criminal Court. Doctors facing criminal charges and Physicians who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Medical Board of California.

Medical Board of California Doctor Workers Compensation Fraud Defense Attorney

The Medical Board of California, known as the MBC, vigorously investigates and disciplines Physicians accused of participating in Workers Compensation Fraud. California law enforcement agencies heavily prosecute Doctors engaging in Workers Compensation Fraud. There are several common methods by which Physicians participate in Workers Compensation Fraud schemes. Physicians often establish clinics known as Claim Mills, or Medical Mills. Doctors at these Claim Mills and Medical Mills often commit the following violations:

• Billing Workers Compensation for services not rendered
• Excessive Treatments
• False Medical Claims
• Gross Negligence in the Practice of Medicine
• Overbilling Workers Compensation for services rendered
• Kickbacks to insurers, medical suppliers, and Pharmacists
• Prescribing unnecessary pain management narcotics medication (Pill Mill)

Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud aided and abetted by Doctors remains a top enforcement priority for the Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies. False and fraudulent billing for services allegedly rendered, as well as kickback schemes, are an investigative priority for law enforcement. The Medical Board of California also targets Physicians at Claim Mills and Medical Mills who prescribe unnecessary painkiller narcotics medications. Put another way, the Medical Board of California targets Physicians running Pill Mills that double as Workers Compensation Claim Mills and Workers Compensation Medical Mills.

Consequences of Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud for Doctors can include Physician and Surgeon License revocation by the Medical Board of California, loss of hospital privileges and even criminal charges. California Physicians facing allegations related to Workers Compensation Fraud should contact an experienced Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Medical Board of California Workers Compensation Fraud Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Medical Board of California Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud Investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Medical Board of California Workers Compensation Fraud Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The Medical Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal Workers Compensation Fraud Investigations against Doctors. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to Workers Compensation Fraud committed by Physicians. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Physicians facing disciplinary action for Workers Compensation Fraud. At the conclusion of a Medical Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. The Board may also refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Physician facing a Medical Board of California Investigation for Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud, contact a California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Workers Compensation Fraud Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Physician serves as notice to a Physician that the Medical Board of California intends to revoke the Physician License. A substantiated allegation of Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud by a Doctor almost always results in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Physician License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Doctors to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Medical Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Disciplinary Accusations involving Workers Compensation Fraud can result in revocation of a Physician and Surgeon License by the Medical Board of California. Doctors facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Hearing For Workers Compensation Fraud

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Medical Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Medical Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Doctor to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physician can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Physicians facing a Medical Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Physician Workers Compensation Fraud Criminal Charges and Medical Board of California Discipline

The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for Workers Compensation Fraud that rises to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The Medical Board of California disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for certain criminal convictions. Medical Board of California Physician discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Physician. All Workers Compensation Fraud crimes are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Doctor.

The Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Physicians for Workers Compensation Fraud. In serious criminal cases against Doctors pending in Criminal Court, the Medical Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Physician. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Physician License in Criminal Court. Doctors facing criminal charges and Physicians who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Medical Board of California.

Medical Board of California Doctor Cosmetic Treatment Discipline Defense Attorney

The Medical Board of California, known as the MBC, vigorously investigates and disciplines Physicians accused of misconduct in the field of Cosmetic Treatments. California is at the forefront of the Medical Cosmetic Treatment industry. The medical practice area of Cosmetic Treatments covers the following categories (this is not an all inclusive list):

• Botox
• Dermabrasion
• Intense Pulse Light Devices
• Laser
• Medi-Spa (Med-Spa)
• Microdermabrasion

There are specific rules, regulations and guidelines that Physicians must follow when performing Borox, Dermabrasion, Laser Treatments and Microdermabrasion. The failure to follow these rules and guidelines can constitute Unprofessional Conduct in the practice of Medicine. By performing medical services below the standard of care, the Doctor can also be liable for Incompetence in the practice of Medicine and Gross Negligence in the practice of Medicine.

A common violation arising from Cosmetic Treatment Centers involves Physicians Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine. There are two common types of Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine at Cosmetic Treatment Clinics. First, Physicians unlawfully serve in a non ownership capacity at Cosmetic Treatment Clinics where medical services are rendered. These clinics are often called Med-Spas, or Medi-Spas and are not owned by Doctors. In other words, these Physicians unlawfully rent their licenses to these clinics by calling themselves medical advisors, medical consultants, or some other similar name. Second, the Physician at the Med-Spa allows persons prohibited from performing these aforementioned medical services to actually perform these aforementioned medical services.

Insurance Fraud at Cosmetic Treatment Clinics and Med-Spas remains a top enforcement goal for the Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies. False and fraudulent billing, as well as kickback schemes, are an investigative priority for law enforcement. The Medical Board of California also targets Doctors at Med-Spa clinics who prescribe unnecessary painkiller narcotics medications. Put another way, the Medical Board of California targets Physicians running Pill Mills that double as Med-Spas or other Cosmetic Treatment Clinics.

Allegations of Aiding and Abetting the Unlicensed Practice of Medicine, Incompetence and Unprofessional Conduct against Physicians in California can have profound consequences. Consequences can include Physician and Surgeon License revocation by the Medical Board of California, loss of hospital privileges and even criminal charges. California Doctors facing allegations related to Cosmetic Treatments and Medi-Spas should contact an experienced Medical Board of California License Defense Attorney for representation.

Medical Board of California Medi-Spa Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of Medical Board of California Med-Spa Investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, Medical Board of California Cosmetic Treatment Clinic Investigations also occur through sting operations and criminal investigations. The Medical Board of California utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Physicians and the Med-Spa industry. In fact, the California Department of Consumer Affairs maintains a specific task force to investigate Med-Spas and Cosmetic Treatment Centers. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to the Cosmetic Medical Treatment industry committed by Doctors against patients. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Physicians facing disciplinary action for allegations related to Cosmetic Treatments for patients. At the conclusion of a Medical Board of California investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In Med-Spa cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Physician facing a Medical Board of California Investigation arising from issues with Cosmetic Treatments or Cosmetic Treatment Clinics, contact a California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Cosmetic Treatment Violations Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Physician serves as notice to a Physician that the Medical Board of California intends to revoke the /Physician License. Allegations of impropriety in the Cosmetic Treatment industry committed by Doctors almost always results in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Physician License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Doctors to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and Medical Board of California. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Disciplinary Accusations involving Domestic Violence can result in revocation of a Physician and Surgeon License by the Medical Board of California. Doctors facing a Medical Board of California Accusation should contact an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Physician License Hearing For Cosmetic Treatment Clinic Issues

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The Medical Board of California can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The Medical Board of California’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Doctor to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Physician can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. California Physicians facing a Medical Board of California Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a Medical Board of California License Defense Lawyer.

California Physician Med-Spa Fraud Criminal Charges and Medical Board of California Discipline

The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for Cosmetic Treatment Violations that rises to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The Medical Board of California disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The Medical Board of California can discipline Doctors for certain criminal convictions. Medical Board of California Physician discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Physician. All Med-Spa crimes are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Doctor.

The Medical Board of California and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Physicians for Cosmetic Treatment Violations In serious criminal cases against Doctors pending in Criminal Court, the Medical Board of California and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Physician. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Physician License in Criminal Court. Doctors facing criminal charges and Physicians who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Physician License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the Medical Board of California.

California Contractor PACE Fraud Defense Attorney

The California Contractors State License Board, or CSLB, vigorously investigates and disciplines Contractors accused of Fraud in the PACE Program. The PACE program acronym stands for Property Assessed Clean Energy. An allegation of PACE Program Fraud can have profound consequences. Consequences can include CSLB Contractor License discipline and even criminal charges.

There are currently twelve active PACE Programs in the State of California. The active PACE Programs are:

• AllianceNRG Program
• CaliforniaFIRST
• Commercial PACE Direct (Cleanfund)
• Energy Efficient Equity
• Figtree Financing
• Greenfinance San Francisco
• HERO Program
• LA County Commercial PACE Program
• Mpower
• PACE Funding
• Samas Capital Pace
• Sonoma County Energy Independence Program (SCEIP)
• Ygrene

The three most well known PACE Programs are HERO, Ygrene and CaliforniaFIRST. San Diego, California based Renovate America operates the HERO Program. Ygrene Energy Fund of Petaluma, California operates the Ygrene Program. Oakland, California based Renew Financial operates the CaliforniaFIRST Program. California Contractors facing PACE Program Fraud allegations should contact an experienced California CSLB License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Contractors State License Board PACE Program Fraud Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California CSLB Investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Contractors State License Board PACE Investigations also occur through sting operations and criminal investigations. The California Contractors State License Board utilizes non sworn civilian investigators (Enforcement Representatives) to conduct non criminal investigations. CSLB also employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal PACE Fraud investigations against Contractors. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations related to PACE Program Fraud committed by Contractors against customers. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

CSLB Investigations related to PACE Program Fraud (particularly HERO and Ygrene) often occur for the following reasons:

• Elder Financial Abuse
• Excessive Telemarketing and Canvassing
• Misrepresentation of PACE Program to Obtain Contract
• Willful and Fraudulent Act
• Unregistered Home Improvement Salesperson

It is important to have an attorney that understands issues faced by Contractors facing disciplinary action for PACE Fraud. At the conclusion of a CSLB investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In PACE Fraud cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

If you are a Contractor facing a California Contractors State License Board Investigation for PACE Fraud, contact a California CSLB Defense Attorney for representation.

California Contractor License PACE Fraud Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Contractor serves as notice to a Contractor that the CSLB intends to revoke the Contractor License. A substantiated allegation of PACE Fraud against by a Contractor almost always results in the filing of a disciplinary Accusation.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Contractor License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Contractors to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and CSLB. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Disciplinary Accusations involving PACE Fraud against a Contractor can result in revocation of a Contractors License by the CSLB. Contractors facing a CSLB Accusation should contact an experienced California Contractor License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Contractors include:

California Contractor License Hearing For PACE Fraud

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The CSLB can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The CSLB’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Contractor to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Contractor can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

California Contractors facing a CSLB Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Contractor License Defense Lawyer.

California Contractor PACE,HERO and Ygrene Fraud and Criminal Charges

The CSLB can discipline Contractors for PACE Fraud allegations that rises to the level of criminal activity, but violates an Administrative Law regulation. The CSLB disciplinary process is separate from the Criminal Law process. The CSLB can discipline Contractors for certain criminal convictions. CSLB Contractor discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Contractor. All PACE Fraud crimes involving Contractors are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Contractor

The CSLB and other law enforcement agencies often conduct criminal investigations against Contractors for the types of PACE Fraud described above. In serious criminal cases against Contractors pending in Criminal Court, the CSLB and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Contractor. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Contractor License in Criminal Court.

Contractors facing criminal charges and Contractors who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Contractor License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the CSLB.

California Structural Pest Control Board License Defense Lawyer

The California Structural Pest Control Board, known as the SPCB, licenses thousands of Pest Control Operators in the State of California. Most California Pest Control Operators have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Structural Pest Control Board. For Pest Control Operators who become part of the California Structural Pest Control Board’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Pest Control Operator License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Pest Control Operators facing the California Structural Pest Control Board disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Pest Control Operator License Defense Attorney.

California SPCB Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Structural Pest Control Board investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Structural Pest Control Board Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Structural Pest Control Board utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. The California Department of Consumer Affairs employs sworn Peace Officer Investigators to conduct criminal investigations against Pest Control Operators. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Structural Pest Control Board disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Structural Pest Control Board investigation, the Board has several options. The Board can choose to close the Complaint. The Board can choose to issue a Citation. The Board can also choose to refer the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will determine whether cause exists to file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Board may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution.

If you are a Pest Control Operator facing a California Structural Pest Control Board investigation, contact a California Pest Control Operator License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Pest Control Operator License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Pest Control Operator serves as notice to a Pest Control Operator that the Board intends to revoke the Pest Control Operator License. The Pest Control Operator, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Pest Control Operator. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Pest Control Operator License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Pest Control Operator License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Pest Control Operators to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Structural Pest Control Board. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Pest Control Operators facing a California Structural Pest Control Board Accusation should contact an experienced California Pest Control Operator License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Pest Control Operators include:

California Pest Control Operator License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Structural Pest Control Board can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Structural Pest Control Board’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Pest Control Operator to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Pest Control Operator can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

California Pest Control Operators facing a California Structural Pest Control Board Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Pest Control Operator License Defense Lawyer.

California Pest Control Operator License and Criminal Convictions

The California Structural Pest Control Board can discipline Pest Control Operators for criminal convictions. California Structural Pest Control Board discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Pest Control Operator. Common criminal offenses that can cause Pest Control Operator License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Structural Pest Control Board and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Pest Control Operators in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Pest Control Operators engaged in Forgery and Fraud. In serious criminal cases against Pest Control Operators pending in Criminal Court, the California Structural Pest Control Board and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Pest Control Operator. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Pest Control Operator License in Criminal Court.

Pest Control Operators facing criminal charges and Pest Control Operators who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Pest Control Operator License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Structural Pest Control Board.

California Pest Control Operator License Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Structural Pest Control Board thoroughly investigates all applicants for Pest Control Operator Licenses. The California Structural Pest Control Board may deny a California Pest Control Operator License to Pest Control Operator students and Pest Control Operators from other states and countries. Most California Pest Control Operator License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Pest Control Operator License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Pest Control Operator License should contact a California Pest Control Operator License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Structural Pest Control Board Statement of Issues Hearing.

California SPCB Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Pest Control Operators who have received a Pest Control Operator License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Pest Control Operator License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Structural Pest Control Board. A successful Pest Control Operator License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Pest Control Operator License Defense Attorney.

California Commission on Teacher Credentialing License Defense Lawyer

The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing, known as the CCTC, licenses several hundred thousand Teachers in the State of California. Most California Teachers have minimal or no contact with the enforcement arm of the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. For Teachers who become part of the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing’s disciplinary process, the consequences are profound. The Teacher License disciplinary process is complex, procedural and time consuming. Teachers facing the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced California Teacher License Defense Attorney.

California CTC Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Investigations also occur through sting operations, criminal conviction referrals and criminal investigations. The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct non criminal investigations. This unit is called the Division of Professional Practices (DPP). The California CTC partners with local law enforcement to conduct criminal investigations against Teachers. These employees investigate criminal and administrative law violations. Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the Due Process Rights accorded in criminal law.

It is important to have an attorney that understands the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing disciplinary process. At the conclusion of a California Commission on Teacher Credentialing investigation, the Committee of Credentials (COC) will recommend discipline to the Commission. The Commission often holds Informal Hearings in Sacramento to allow the Respondent the opportunity to respond to the allegations.

At the conclusion of the investigation, the Commission can choose to close the Complaint. The Commission can choose to issue a Private Admonition, Public Reproval, Suspension or Revocation. An Appeal of the Commission’s decision will result in a referral of the matter to the California Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office will file a formal disciplinary Accusation. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Commission may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. If you are a Teacher facing a California Commission on Teacher Credentialing investigation, contact a California Commission on Teacher Credentialing License Defense Attorney for representation.

California Teacher License Accusation Defense Attorney

A formal Accusation served on a California Teacher serves as notice to a Teacher that the Board intends to revoke the Teacher License. The Teacher, now called the Respondent, has only 15 days from the date that the Accusation was served (not received, but served) to file a Notice of Defense. The failure to file a Notice of Defense results in a Default against the Teacher. A Default will result in the immediate Revocation of the Teacher License.

An Accusation is a serious matter that can result in the suspension or revocation of a Teacher License in California. In many cases, it is possible for Teachers to reach a Stipulated Agreement with the Attorney General’s Office and California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. A Stipulated Agreement is a formal term for a settlement agreement. If a Stipulated Agreement cannot be reached, the parties will proceed to a formal Hearing before the California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Teachers facing a California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Accusation should contact an experienced California Teacher License Defense Attorney for representation. Common causes of action for disciplinary Accusations against Teachers include:

Assaulting a Student Battery to a Student Bullying Corporal Punishment Criminal Threats Cyber Bullying Cyber Sexual Bullying Drug Sales Extortion Fighting

Harassment Hate Crimes Hazing Gang Activity Gang Clothing Gang Paraphernalia Inappropriate Contact With Students on Social Media Intimidation Lewd Conduct

Obscene Behavior Providing Alcohol to Minors Public Intoxication Sexual Harassment Sexual Relations With a Student Stalking Terrorist Threats Theft of School Property Trespass Vandalism to School Property

California Teacher License Hearing Attorney

The California Office of Administrative Hearings, also known as OAH, maintains several Court Hearing locations. These Court locations are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. In some instances, Hearings may be held offsite in Bakersfield, Fresno, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Jose or Ventura. The Administrative Law Hearing is a formal Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.

The Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, will issue a written Proposed Decision approximately 30 days after the Hearing. The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing can adopt, modify or reject the ALJ’s Proposed Decision. The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing’s action is called the Final Decision and Order. There are two main rights of Appeal of a Final Decision and Order. California Government Code § 11521 allows a Teacher to file a Petition for Reconsideration prior to the effective date of the Final Decision and Order. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5, the Teacher can also file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Superior Court. A Writ must be filed within 30 days of the effective date of the Final Decision and Order.

California Teachers facing a California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Administrative Law Hearing need effective representation from a California Teacher License Defense Lawyer.

California Teacher License and Criminal Convictions

The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing can discipline Teachers for criminal convictions. California Commission on Teacher Credentialing discipline occurs for criminal convictions that are substantially related to the duties, functions and qualifications of a Teacher. Common criminal offenses that can cause Teacher License discipline are:

Altering or Forging a Prescription Assault With a Deadly Weapon Battery Brandishing a Firearm Burglary Carrying a Concealed Weapon Child Abuse Child Endangerment Diverting a Controlled Substance Domestic Violence

DUI Elder Abuse False Imprisonment Forgery Fraud Hit & Run Identity Theft Insurance Fraud Medicare Fraud Mortgage Fraud Possession for Sale of a Controlled Substance

Possession of a Controlled Substance Public Intoxication Real Estate Fraud Robbery Sex Offenses Theft Trespass Vandalism Vehicular Manslaughter

The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing and other law enforcement agencies also investigate criminal conduct by Teachers in the course and scope of their practice. Criminal investigations often involve Teachers engaged in Child Abuse and Sex Offenses. In serious criminal cases against Teachers pending in Criminal Court, the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing and the California Attorney General’s Office may seek a California Penal Code § 23 Order against the Teacher. A California Penal Code § 23 Order seeks to suspend a Teacher License in Criminal Court.

Teachers facing criminal charges and Teachers who are convicted of criminal offenses need an experienced California Teacher License Defense Attorney for representation in disciplinary proceedings before the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing.

California Teacher License Statement of Issues Attorney

The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing thoroughly investigates all applicants for Teacher Licenses. The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing may deny a California Teacher License to Teacher students and Teachers from other states and countries. Most California Teacher License denials occur due to criminal convictions, financial problems or misstatements on the Teacher License application. Statement of Issues Hearings and Accusation Hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings maintain a similar procedure. However, in a Statement of Issues Hearing, the applicant bears the burden of proof. Individuals denied a Teacher License should contact a California Teacher License Denial Lawyer for representation in a California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Statement of Issues Hearing.

CCTC Petition for Reinstatement Lawyer

A Petition for Reinstatement allows Teachers who have received a Teacher License Revocation to reinstate their License. The Petition for Reinstatement must show by clear and convincing evidence the factual and legal reasons to warrant the Teacher License Reinstatement. Rehabilitation from past misconduct is the primary factor in a Petition for Reinstatement before the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. A successful Teacher License Petition for Reinstatement requires representation by an experienced California Teacher License Defense Attorney.

OPUSD Student Expulsion Defense Lawyer

The Oak Park Unified School District operates two high schools; Oak Park High School and Oak View High School. While many students face disciplinary action, few face Expulsion. Students involved in an OPUSD Expulsion proceeding face a complex, procedural and time consuming process. The consequences of an OPUSD Student Expulsion proceeding are profound. Students facing a Oak Park Unified School District Expulsion disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced Oak Park Unified School District Students Expulsion Defense Attorney.

The following offenses are common reasons for OPUSD Student Expulsion:

Assault Battery Bullying Criminal Threats Cyber Bullying Cyber Sexual Bullying Disruptive Behavior Disorderly Conduct Extortion Fighting Harassment Hate Crimes Hazing Gang Activity

Gang Clothing Gang Paraphernalia Intimidation Obscene Behavior Possession of Alcohol Possession of Ammunition Possession of Explosives Possession of Marijuana Possession of Prescription Pills Possession of Tobacco Possession of a Controlled Substance Possession of a Firearm Possession of a Knife Public Intoxication

Robbery Sale of Alcohol Sale of Marijuana Sale of Prescription Pills Sale of Tobacco Sale of a Controlled Substance Sexual Harassment Stalking Terrorist Threats Theft of School Property Trespass Truancy Use of a Weapon Vandalism to School Property

 Oak Park Unified School District Expulsion Appeal Lawyer

The OPUSD Expulsion process begins with an informal conference between the school Principal and the accused student. The school will provide a written notice of suspension to the parent or guardian of the student. The school Principal will then hold an informal conference with the student and the student’s parent or legal guardian. If the school desires to proceed with Expulsion, the parent or legal guardian will be notified by mail. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Oak Park Unified School District may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. The OPUSD Administrative Law Hearing process differs substantially from other areas of law. It is important to have an attorney that understands the OPUSD Administrative Law Hearing process. Students facing a Oak Park Unified School District Expulsion disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an OPUSD Students Expulsion Defense Attorney.

OPUSD Student Expulsion Hearing Defense Attorney

The Oak Park Unified School District’s Expulsion Review Committee conducts Student Expulsion Hearings. The Expulsion Hearing functions in a similar manner to a Court Hearing. As explained earlier, Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the rights conferred on the accused in Criminal Court. The student has the right to be represented by an attorney, question adverse witnesses and present favorable evidence and witnesses. The OPUSD Board of Education will make factual findings and issue a recommended decision. The Oak Park Unified School District Board of Education can decide to Not Recommend Expulsion (NRE), recommend Expulsion, or recommend an Expulsion With Suspended Enforcement. The Oak Park Unified School District Board of Education renders the final decision of Expulsion. It is recommended that a student seek representation from a Oak Park Unified School District Student Expulsion Hearing Defense Lawyer.

Oak Park Unified School District Board of Education Expulsion Appeal Attorney

As stated above, the Oak Park Unified School District Board of Education renders the final decision of Expulsion. The Oak Park Unified School District’s Board of Education usually holds a public Hearing on the Student Expulsion. The student and student’s parent or legal guardian can address the Oak Park Unified School District’s Board of Education. The OPUSD Board of Education will mail a final ruling to the parent or legal guardian. Within 30 days of the OPUSD Board of Education’s decision to expel a student, the student or parent/legal guardian has the right to file an Appeal to the Ventura County Board of Education. OPUSD students facing an OPUSD Student Expulsion should obtain effective representation from a Oak Park Unified School District Expulsion Appeal Lawyer.

OPUSD Student Expulsion and Juvenile Criminal Investigations 

The Oak Park Unified School District works closely with the Ventura County Sheriff’s Department and the Ventura County District Attorney’s Office to prosecute students who commit criminal offenses. Many of the offenses listed above can constitute criminal conduct. OPUSD students facing criminal investigations require an experienced OPUSD Student Expulsion Defense Attorney for representation in Oak Park Unified School District Student Expulsion proceedings.

CVUSD Student Expulsion Defense Lawyer

The Conejo Valley Unified School District operates five high schools; Century Academy, Conejo Valley High School, Newbury Park High School, Thousand Oaks High School and Westlake High School. While many students face disciplinary action, few face Expulsion. Students involved in an CVUSD Expulsion proceeding face a complex, procedural and time consuming process. The consequences of an CVUSD Student Expulsion proceeding are profound. Students facing a Conejo Valley Unified School District Expulsion disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced Conejo Valley Unified School District Students Expulsion Defense Attorney.

The following offenses are common reasons for CVUSD Student Expulsion:

Assault Battery Bullying Criminal Threats Cyber Bullying Cyber Sexual Bullying Disruptive Behavior Disorderly Conduct Extortion Fighting Harassment Hate Crimes Hazing Gang Activity

Gang Clothing Gang Paraphernalia Intimidation Obscene Behavior Possession of Alcohol Possession of Ammunition Possession of Explosives Possession of Marijuana Possession of Prescription Pills Possession of Tobacco Possession of a Controlled Substance Possession of a Firearm Possession of a Knife Public Intoxication

Robbery Sale of Alcohol Sale of Marijuana Sale of Prescription Pills Sale of Tobacco Sale of a Controlled Substance Sexual Harassment Stalking Terrorist Threats Theft of School Property Trespass Truancy Use of a Weapon Vandalism to School Property

 Conejo Valley Unified School District Expulsion Appeal Lawyer

The CVUSD Expulsion process begins with an informal conference between the school Principal and the accused student. The school will provide a written notice of suspension to the parent or guardian of the student. The school Principal will then hold an informal conference with the student and the student’s parent or legal guardian. If the school desires to proceed with Expulsion, the parent or legal guardian will be notified by mail. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Conejo Valley Unified School District may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. The CVUSD Administrative Law Hearing process differs substantially from other areas of law. It is important to have an attorney that understands the CVUSD Administrative Law Hearing process. Students facing a Conejo Valley Unified School District Expulsion disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an CVUSD Students Expulsion Defense Attorney.

CVUSD Student Expulsion Hearing Defense Attorney

The Conejo Valley Unified School District’s Expulsion Review Committee conducts Student Expulsion Hearings. The Expulsion Hearing functions in a similar manner to a Court Hearing. As explained earlier, Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the rights conferred on the accused in Criminal Court. The student has the right to be represented by an attorney, question adverse witnesses and present favorable evidence and witnesses. The CVUSD Board of Education will make factual findings and issue a recommended decision. The Conejo Valley Unified School District Board of Education can decide to Not Recommend Expulsion (NRE), recommend Expulsion, or recommend an Expulsion With Suspended Enforcement. The Conejo Valley Unified School District Board of Education renders the final decision of Expulsion. It is recommended that a student seek representation from a Conejo Valley Unified School District Student Expulsion Hearing Defense Lawyer.

Conejo Valley Unified School District Board of Education Expulsion Appeal Attorney

As stated above, the Conejo Valley Unified School District Board of Education renders the final decision of Expulsion. The Conejo Valley Unified School District’s Board of Education usually holds a public Hearing on the Student Expulsion. The student and student’s parent or legal guardian can address the Conejo Valley Unified School District’s Board of Education. The CVUSD Board of Education will mail a final ruling to the parent or legal guardian. Within 30 days of the CVUSD Board of Education’s decision to expel a student, the student or parent/legal guardian has the right to file an Appeal to the Ventura County Board of Education. CVUSD students facing an CVUSD Student Expulsion should obtain effective representation from a Conejo Valley Unified School District Expulsion Appeal Lawyer.

CVUSD Student Expulsion and Juvenile Criminal Investigations 

The Conejo Valley Unified School District works closely with the Ventura County Sheriff’s Department and the Ventura County District Attorney’s Office to prosecute students who commit criminal offenses. Many of the offenses listed above can constitute criminal conduct. CVUSD students facing criminal investigations require an experienced CVUSD Student Expulsion Defense Attorney for representation in Conejo Valley Unified School District Student Expulsion proceedings.

Burbank Unified School District Student Expulsion Defense Lawyer

The Burbank Unified School District operates three high schools; Burbank High School, John Burroughs High School and Monterey High School. While many students face disciplinary action, few face Expulsion. Students involved in an Burbank Unified School District Expulsion proceeding face a complex, procedural and time consuming process. The consequences of an Burbank Unified School District Student Expulsion proceeding are profound. Students facing a Burbank Unified School District Expulsion disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced Burbank Unified School District Students Expulsion Defense Attorney.

The following offenses are common reasons for Burbank Unified School District Student Expulsion:

Assault Battery Bullying Criminal Threats Cyber Bullying Cyber Sexual Bullying Disruptive Behavior Disorderly Conduct Extortion Fighting Harassment Hate Crimes Hazing Gang Activity

Gang Clothing Gang Paraphernalia Intimidation Obscene Behavior Possession of Alcohol Possession of Ammunition Possession of Explosives Possession of Marijuana Possession of Prescription Pills Possession of Tobacco Possession of a Controlled Substance Possession of a Firearm Possession of a Knife Public Intoxication

Robbery Sale of Alcohol Sale of Marijuana Sale of Prescription Pills Sale of Tobacco Sale of a Controlled Substance Sexual Harassment Stalking Terrorist Threats Theft of School Property Trespass Truancy Use of a Weapon Vandalism to School Property

Burbank Unified School District Expulsion Appeal Lawyer

The Burbank Unified School District Expulsion process begins with an informal conference between the school Principal and the accused student. The school will provide a written notice of suspension to the parent or guardian of the student. The school Principal will then hold an informal conference with the student and the student’s parent or legal guardian. If the school desires to proceed with Expulsion, the parent or legal guardian will be notified by mail. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Burbank Unified School District may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. The Burbank Unified School District Administrative Law Hearing process differs substantially from other areas of law. It is important to have an attorney that understands the Burbank Unified School District Administrative Law Hearing process. Students facing a Burbank Unified School District Expulsion disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an Burbank Unified School District Students Expulsion Defense Attorney.

Burbank Unified School District Student Expulsion Hearing Defense Attorney

The Burbank Unified School District’s Expulsion Review Committee conducts Student Expulsion Hearings. The Expulsion Hearing functions in a similar manner to a Court Hearing. As explained earlier, Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the rights conferred on the accused in Criminal Court. The student has the right to be represented by an attorney, question adverse witnesses and present favorable evidence and witnesses. The Burbank Unified School District Board of Education will make factual findings and issue a recommended decision. The Burbank Unified School District Board of Education can decide to Not Recommend Expulsion (NRE), recommend Expulsion, or recommend an Expulsion With Suspended Enforcement. The Burbank Unified School District Board of Education renders the final decision of Expulsion. It is recommended that a student seek representation from a Burbank Unified School District Student Expulsion Hearing Defense Lawyer.

Burbank Unified School District Board of Education Expulsion Appeal Attorney

As stated above, the Burbank Unified School District Board of Education renders the final decision of Expulsion. The Burbank Unified School District’s Board of Education usually holds a public Hearing on the Student Expulsion. The student and student’s parent or legal guardian can address the Burbank Unified School District’s Board of Education. The Burbank Unified School District Board of Education will mail a final ruling to the parent or legal guardian. Within 30 days of the Burbank Unified School District Board of Education’s decision to expel a student, the student or parent/legal guardian has the right to file an Appeal to the Los Angeles County Board of Education. Burbank Unified School District students facing an Burbank Unified School District Student Expulsion should obtain effective representation from a Burbank Unified School District Expulsion Appeal Lawyer.

Burbank Unified School District Student Expulsion and Juvenile Criminal Investigations 

The Burbank Unified School District works closely with the Burbank Police Department and the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office to prosecute students who commit criminal offenses. Many of the offenses listed above can constitute criminal conduct. Burbank Unified School District students facing criminal investigations require an experienced Burbank Unified School District Student Expulsion Defense Attorney for representation in Burbank Unified School District Student Expulsion proceedings.

LVUSD Student Expulsion Defense Lawyer

The Las Virgenes Unified School District operates two high schools; Agoura High School and Calabasas High School. While many students face disciplinary action, few face Expulsion. Students involved in an LVUSD Expulsion proceeding face a complex, procedural and time consuming process. The consequences of an LVUSD Student Expulsion proceeding are profound. Students facing a Las Virgenes Unified School District Expulsion disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an experienced Las Virgenes Unified School District Students Expulsion Defense Attorney.

The following offenses are common reasons for LVUSD Student Expulsion:

Assault Battery Bullying Criminal Threats Cyber Bullying Cyber Sexual Bullying Disruptive Behavior Disorderly Conduct Extortion Fighting Harassment Hate Crimes Hazing Gang Activity

Gang Clothing Gang Paraphernalia Intimidation Obscene Behavior Possession of Alcohol Possession of Ammunition Possession of Explosives Possession of Marijuana Possession of Prescription Pills Possession of Tobacco Possession of a Controlled Substance Possession of a Firearm Possession of a Knife Public Intoxication

Robbery Sale of Alcohol Sale of Marijuana Sale of Prescription Pills Sale of Tobacco Sale of a Controlled Substance Sexual Harassment Stalking Terrorist Threats Theft of School Property Trespass Truancy Use of a Weapon Vandalism to School Property

Las Virgenes Unified School District Expulsion Appeal Lawyer

The LVUSD Expulsion process begins with an informal conference between the school Principal and the accused student. The school will provide a written notice of suspension to the parent or guardian of the student. The school Principal will then hold an informal conference with the student and the student’s parent or legal guardian. If the school desires to proceed with Expulsion, the parent or legal guardian will be notified by mail. In cases involving criminal conduct, the Las Virgenes Unified School District may refer the case to the District Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution. The LVUSD Administrative Law Hearing process differs substantially from other areas of law. It is important to have an attorney that understands the LVUSD Administrative Law Hearing process. Students facing a Las Virgenes Unified School District Expulsion disciplinary process should seek legal representation from an LVUSD Students Expulsion Defense Attorney.

LVUSD Student Expulsion Hearing Defense Attorney

The Las Virgenes Unified School District’s Expulsion Review Committee conducts Student Expulsion Hearings. The Expulsion Hearing functions in a similar manner to a Court Hearing. As explained earlier, Administrative Law Due Process Rights differ substantially from the rights conferred on the accused in Criminal Court. The student has the right to be represented by an attorney, question adverse witnesses and present favorable evidence and witnesses. The LVUSD Board of Education will make factual findings and issue a recommended decision. The Las Virgenes Unified School District Board of Education can decide to Not Recommend Expulsion (NRE), recommend Expulsion, or recommend an Expulsion With Suspended Enforcement. The Las Virgenes Unified School District Board of Education renders the final decision of Expulsion. It is recommended that a student seek representation from a Las Virgenes Unified School District Student Expulsion Hearing Defense Lawyer.

Las Virgenes Unified School District Board of Education Expulsion Appeal Attorney

As stated above, the Las Virgenes Unified School District Board of Education renders the final decision of Expulsion. The Las Virgenes Unified School District’s Board of Education usually holds a public Hearing on the Student Expulsion. The student and student’s parent or legal guardian can address the Las Virgenes Unified School District’s Board of Education. The LVUSD Board of Education will mail a final ruling to the parent or legal guardian. Within 30 days of the LVUSD Board of Education’s decision to expel a student, the student or parent/legal guardian has the right to file an Appeal to the Los Angeles County Board of Education. LVUSD students facing an LVUSD Student Expulsion should obtain effective representation from a Las Virgenes Unified School District Expulsion Appeal Lawyer.

LVUSD Student Expulsion and Juvenile Criminal Investigations 

The Las Virgenes Unified School District works closely with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office to prosecute students who commit criminal offenses. Many of the offenses listed above can constitute criminal conduct. LVUSD students facing criminal investigations require an experienced LVUSD Student Expulsion Defense Attorney for representation in Las Virgenes Unified School District Student Expulsion proceedings.